EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 363 (2022) E3S Web Conf., 363 (2022) 02020 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 363, 2022
XV International Scientific Conference on Precision Agriculture and Agricultural Machinery Industry “State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness - INTERAGROMASH 2022”
Article Number 02020
Number of page(s) 13
Section Precision Farming Software. Agroecology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202236302020
Published online 14 December 2022
  1. IPCC, 2012 https://www.ipcc.ch/report/managing-the-risks-of-extreme-events-and-disasters-to-advance-climate-change-adaptation [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Kovtun, E. Protsenko, A. Sukhinov, A. Chistyakov, Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics, 9(2), 27–38 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  3. Belotserkovsky, O. Turbulence, New Approaches, pp 1-286s (Nauka, Moskva, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  4. E. Alekseenko, B. Roux, and etc., Coastal hydrodynamics in a windy lagoon, Computers and Fluids, 77, 24–35 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Sukhinov, A. Chistyakov, A. Semenyakina, A. Nikitina, ComputerResearch and Modeling, 8(1), 151–168 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Nikitina, A. Sukhinov, and etc., Mathematical Modeling, 28(7), 96–106 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. I. Kesoretskikh, S. Zotov, Bulletinof the I. Kant Baltic Federal University. Kant, 1, 51–57 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Gundlash, M. Hayes, Marine technology society journal, 12(4), 18–27 (1978) [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Amaro Medina, V. Dmitriev, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Earth Sciences, 64(2), 162–184 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  10. I. Kesoretskikh, S. Zotov, N. Lazareva, Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences, 153–161 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. I. Rodziller, Forecast Forecast of water quality in reservoirs – wastewater receivers, pp 1–263, (Stroyizdat, Moskva, 1984) [Google Scholar]
  12. GOST R 55059–2012 Safety in emergencies. Emergency risk management. Terms and definitions [Google Scholar]
  13. GOST 12.1.007–76 Occupational safety standards system. Noxious substances. Classification and general safety requirements [Google Scholar]
  14. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.10: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for environment. – European Chemicals Agency, 2008. 65 p. URL: https://echa.europa.eu/guidance-documents/guidance-on-information-requirements-and-chemical-safety-assessment [Google Scholar]
  15. Soil and Sediment Risk Assessment of Organic Chemicals. Technical Report No. 92. – European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals. Brussels, December, pp 1–145 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  16. Criteria for assessing the ecological situation of territories for identifying zones of an environmental emergencyand zones of ecological disaster, http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901797511 [Google Scholar]
  17. G.G. Vinberg, Journal of General Biology, 61(5), 549–560 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  18. Methodological guidelines RD 52.24.643–2002. Method of integrated assessment of the degree of contamination of land surface waters by hydrochemical indicators, pp.1–49, St. Petersburg, Gidrometeoizdat, (2003) [Google Scholar]
  19. Methodological guidelines RD 52.24.661–2004. Recommendations. Assessment of the risk of anthropogenic impact of priority pollutants on land surface waters, pp.1–26,. Moskva, publishing House of the Meteorological Agency of Roshydromet, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  20. V. Danilov-Danilyan, A. Gotovtsev, A. Nikanorov, Vodnye resursy, 39(58), 510–520 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Jamalov, K. Myagkova, and etc., Water and ecology: problems and solutions, 4(72), 26–39 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Nikanorov, V. Bryzgalo, O. Reshetnyak, Voda: khimiya i ekologiya, 12, 15–21 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Sukhinov, V. Tishkin, Experience in modeling hydrophysical processes in the Sea of Azov Supercomputer technologies in science, education and industry, 156–164 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  24. G. Matishov, O. Stepanyan, and etc., Bulletin of the Southern Scientific Center, 11(2), 36–44 (2015) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.