EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 363 (2022) E3S Web Conf., 363 (2022) 02044 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 363, 2022
XV International Scientific Conference on Precision Agriculture and Agricultural Machinery Industry “State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness - INTERAGROMASH 2022”
Article Number 02044
Number of page(s) 18
Section Precision Farming Software. Agroecology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202236302044
Published online 14 December 2022
  1. A. Shevchuk, BIM boom. How developers, architects and state apply BIM, https://gmk.ru/blog/boom-na-bimhttps://gmk.ru/blog/boom-na-bim [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Firdaus Razali et. al., IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 357, 012028 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/357/1/012028 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Burgess, M. Jones, K. Muir, BIM in the UK house building industry: opportunities and barriers to adoption (2018) DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.19611.92962 [Google Scholar]
  4. V. Talapov, BIM: what does it usually stands for? https://isicad.ru/ru/articles.php?article_num=17298 [Google Scholar]
  5. I. Musonda, Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference (2019) DOI:10.3311/ccc2019-065 [Google Scholar]
  6. F. Khosrowshahi, Y. Arayici, Engineering (2012) DOI:19.10.1108/09699981211277531 [Google Scholar]
  7. V. Talapov, BIM implementation: fundamental experience of Great Britain, https://sapr.ru/article/25400 [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaneta Takashi, Furusaka Shuzo, Tamura Atsushi, Deng Nisi, Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture (2016) DOI:10.17265/1934-7359/2016.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Graham, The rise of BIM in the UK / https://www.pbctoday.co.uk/news/digital-construction/bim-news/2020-bim-report/87016/ [Google Scholar]
  10. Status of BIM adaptation in Europe (2019) http://armo-group.ru/blog/status-adaptaczii-bim-v-evrope/ [Google Scholar]
  11. A.V. Skvortsov, CAD and GIS of highways. Iss. 2(7), 2016, 4–48. [Google Scholar]
  12. Results of the research of the problems of the implementation of technologies of information modeling in investment-and-construction projects in the Russian companies, https://mgsu.ru/news/2022/Otchet_rez_issled_problem_TIM.pdf [Google Scholar]
  13. V. Mozganova, Technologies of information modeling: delay, which is supposed to help to solve a lot of problems. But whether will it help? https://www.bfm.ru/news/496598 [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Efremova, Business Strategies 9, 106–109 (2021) 10.17747/2311–7184–2021–4–106–109 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Konkurator, Level of use BIM technologies in Russia. Report on the research (2017) http://concurator.ru/information/bim_report/ [Google Scholar]
  16. Konkurator, Level of use BIM technologies in Russia. Report on the research (2019) http://concurator.ru/information/bim_report_2019/ [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Migilinskas, V. Popov, V. Juocevicius, L. Ustinovichius, Procedia Engineering 57, 767–774 (2013) ISSN 1877–7058 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Z. Sriyolja, N. Harwin, K. Yahya, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 738, 012021 (2021) doi:10.1088/1755-1315/738/1/012021 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sander Siebelink, Hans Voordijk, Maaike Endedijk, Arjen Adriaanse, Front. Eng. Manag. 8(2), 236–257 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0088-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Enshassi, Kh. Hallaq, B. Tayeh, Civil Engineering Research Journal 8, 1–8 (2019) 10.19080/CERJ.2019.08.555739 [Google Scholar]
  21. I. Othman, Y. Yahya Al-Ashmori, Y. Rahmawati, Y.H. Mugahed Amran, M. Ali Mohammed Al-Bared, Ain Shams Engineering Journal 12(1), 455–463 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.04.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Khairul Firdaus Anuar, Mohd Hezriq Idzuwan Zainal Abidin, Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur Research Journal 3.1 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  23. Hyarat, Esraa, Hyarat, Tasneem, Al Kuisi, Mustafa, Buildings 12 (2022) 10.3390/buildings12020150 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Matarneh, S. Hamed, Open Journal of Civil Engineering 7, 325–335 (2017) doi: 10.4236/ojce.2017.73022 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. A.T. Hall, S. Durdyev, K. Koc, O.L. Ekmekcioglu, Tupenaite, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management (2022), https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM- 03–2022–0215 [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Migilinskas, V. Popov, V. Juocevicius, L. Ustinovichius, Procedia Engineering 57, 767–774 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.097 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. S.Y. Wong, J. Gray, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 495, 012002 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gardezi, Dr Syed, Shafiq, Nasir, Nurudinn, Muhd, Farhan, Syed Ahmad, Aminu Umar, Usman, Applied Mechanics and Materials 567, 559–564 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. E.A. Chesnokova, V.V. Khokhlova, N.A. Ponyavina, A.S. Chesnokov, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 972, 012038 (2020) doi:10.1088/1757-899X/972/1/012038/ [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ingjing Xie, Yangzi Qiu, Yishuang Liang, Yuekuan Zhou, Zhengxuan Liu, Guoqiang Energy Reports 8, 7107–7126 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Maunula, Riitta, Smeds, Hirvensalo, Antero, Innovations in Networks – Proceedings of the APMS 2008 Conference, An Event of the IFIP Working Group 5.7, 379–386 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  32. Risto Tulenheimo, Procedia Economics and Finance 21, 469–477 (2015) 10.1016/S2212–5671(15)00201–4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hannele Kerosuo Reijo, Miettinen Sami Paavola, Tarja Mäki Jenni Korpela, Production 25(2), 289–297 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.106512 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. R. Alshorafa, E. Ergen, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 28(1), 397–423 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2018-0352 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.