Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 363, 2022
XV International Scientific Conference on Precision Agriculture and Agricultural Machinery Industry “State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness - INTERAGROMASH 2022”
Article Number 03050
Number of page(s) 6
Section Precision Agriculture. Yield Monitoring and Estimation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202236303050
Published online 14 December 2022
  1. N. Feoktistova et al., Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Estestvennye Nauki, 159, 85–107 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Savustyanenko, Actual Infectology, 2, 35–44 (2016). Doi:10.22141/2312-413x.2.11.2016.77529 [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Petra et al., Clinical therapeutics, 37, 984–995 (2015). Doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.04.002 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Y. Zhou et al., Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 12, 1–7 (2020). Doi:10.1007/s12602-019-9524-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Li et al., Food & function, 9, 6586–6598 (2018). Doi: 10.1039/c8fo01768a [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Garcia-Bayona, L. Comstock, Science, 361, eaat2456 (2018). Doi:10.1126/science.aat2456 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Williams, B. Schumacher, Mechanisms of ageing and development, 165, 27–32 (2017). Doi:10.1016/j.mad.2016.09.007 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Prazdnova et al., Current microbiology, 76, 312–319 (2019). Doi:10.1007/s00284-018-01623-2 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Chistyakov et al., Biosensors, 8, 25 (2018). Doi:10.3390/bios8010025 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Varadarajan et al, NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 6, 1, 1–17 (2020). Doi:10.1038/s41522-020-00154-8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. S.M. Ribeiro et al., Pharmacology & therapeutics, 160, 133–144 (2016). Doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.02.006 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Crane et al., Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 8, 410 (2018). Doi:10.3389/fcimb.2018.00410 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Zorov et al., Biochemistry, 79, 1017–1031 (2014). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Zolotukhin et al., Biochemistry, 81, 329–337 (2016). Doi:10.1134/S0006297916040039 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Saint-Georges-Chaumet et al., Cellular and Molecular Biology, 61, 121–124 (2015). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Nakagawa et al., Aging cell, 15, 227–236 (2016). Doi:10.1111/acel.12431 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Paleolog et al, Animals, 11, 1246 (2021). Doi:10.3390/ani11051246 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Singh, Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 8, 762–768 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Prazdnova et al., Beneficial microbes, 10, 395–412 (2019). Doi:10.3920/BM2018.0149 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Mcerlean, J. Overbay, S.Van Lanen Journal Of Industrial Microbiology And Biotechnology, 46, 493–513 (2019). Doi: 10.1007/s10295-018-02130-w [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. I. Zalila-Kolsi et al., Microbiological research, 192, 148–158 (2016). Doi:10.1016/j.micres.2016.06.012 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. A.Vasilchenko, E. Rogozhin, Frontiers in microbiology, 10, 1160 (2019). Doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01160 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.