Open Access
Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 368, 2023
4th African Regional Conference on Geosynthetics (GeoAfrica 2023)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01003 | |
Number of page(s) | 17 | |
Section | KEYNOTE PAPERS | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202336801003 | |
Published online | 17 February 2023 |
- Zornberg, J.G. (2017). “Geosynthetics in Roadway Infrastructure.” Procedia Engineering, Elsevier, Transportation Geotechnics and Geoecology, May, Vol. 189, pp. 298–306. [Google Scholar]
- Zornberg, J.G. and Tutumluer, E. (2021). “Summary of Applications Involving Geosynthetics in Transportation Infrastructure.” Training Material, Short course on Geosynthetics in Roadways, Railways, and Airfields. [Google Scholar]
- Haliburton, T.A., Lawmaster, I.D. and McGuffey, V.C., Use of Engineering Fabrics in Transportation Related Applications, FHWA DTFH61-80-C-Q0094, 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Zornberg, J.G., Roodi, G.H., & Gupta, R. 2017. “Stiffness of Soil-geosynthetic Composite under Small Displacements: I. Model Development.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 143, No. 10, October. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Archer S. & Wayne M. H. 2012. “Relevancy of Material Properties in Predicting the Performance of Geogrid-Stabilized Roadway.” Proc. of the conference GeoFrontiers, Advances in Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Oakland, California, pp.1320–1329 [Google Scholar]
- Giroud, J.P., and Han, J. (2016). “Mechanisms Governing the Performance of Unpaved Roads incorporating Geosynthetics: Part 1.” Geosynthetics, Industrial Fabrics Association International, June. [Google Scholar]
- Perkins, S.W., Christopher, B. R., Cuelho, E.L., Eiksund, G.R., Hoff, I., Schwartz, C.W., Svano, G., and Want, A. (2004). “Development of Design Methods for Geosynthetic Reinforced Flexile Pavements.” U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-DTFH61-01-X-00068, Final report., Washington, D.C., USA, 263p. [Google Scholar]
- Christopher, B.R., Cuelho, E.V., and Perkins, S.W. (2008). “Development of Geogrid Junction Strength Requirement for Reinforced Roadway Base Design.” In Proceeding of GeoAmericas 2008 Conference, Cancun, Mexico, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Cuelho, E., and Perkins, S. (2005). “Resilient Interface Shear Modulus from Short Strip Cyclic Pullout Tests.” Geofrontiers: Slopes and retaining structures under seismic and static conditions, ASCE GSP-140, Austin, TX. [Google Scholar]
- Mahmood, T., Hatami, K., Ghabchi, R., and Zaman, M.M. (2012). “Pullout Performance of Geogrids with Different Junction Strength.” Proceeding of the Geo-Congress 2012: State of the Art and Practice in Geotechnical Engineering, Oakland, CA, USA, pp. 1360–1370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X., Jia, Y. and Zhang, J., 2018. Stress-strain response and dilation of geogrid-reinforced coarse-grained soils in large-scale direct shear tests. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 41(3), pp.601–610. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, R., (2009). A Study of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Flexible Pavement System. PhD Dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA, 318p. [Google Scholar]
- Roodi, G. H. (2016). Analytical, Experimental, and Field Evaluations of Soil-geosynthetic Interaction under Small Displacements. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, August 2016, 623 p. [Google Scholar]
- Roodi, G. H., and Zornberg, J. G. (2017). “Stiffness of Soil-Geosynthetic Composite under Small Displacements: II. Experimental Evaluation” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 143, No. 10, 10.1061/(ASCE) GT.1943–5606.0001769, 04017076. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- AASHTO R50. 2009. Standard Practice for Geosynthetic Reinforcement of the Aggregate Base Course of Flexible Pavement Structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. [Google Scholar]
- Roodi, G.H., & Zornberg, J.G. 2017. “Stiffness of Soil-geosynthetic Composite under Small Displacements. II: Experimental Evaluation.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 143, No. 10, October. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- ASTM D6706-01(07) (2007). “Standard Test Method for Measuring Geosynthetic Pullout Resistance in Soil.” American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 8p. [Google Scholar]
- ASTM D4595–11 (2011). “Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Geotextiles by the Wide-Width Strip Method.” American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 13p. [Google Scholar]
- ASTM D6637/D6637 M-15 (2015). “Standard Test Method for Determining Tensile Properties of Geogrids by the Single or Multi-Rib Tensile Method.” American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 6p. [Google Scholar]
- Peve, L. (2020). M.S. Thesis: “Sources of Variability in Small-scale Soil-geosynthetic Interaction Testing.” Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering. The University of Texas at Austin. [Google Scholar]
- TxDOT SS3239. 2004. Special Specification for Thin Overlay Mix (TOM). TxDOT [Google Scholar]
- Epps Martin, A., Walubita, L.F., Hugo, F. and Bangera, N.U., 2003. Pavement response and rutting for full-scale and scaled APT. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 129(4), pp.451–461. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sweta, K. and Hussaini, S.K.K., 2019. Behavior evaluation of geogrid-reinforced ballast-subballast interface under shear condition. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 47(1), pp.23–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.