EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 368 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 368 (2023) 03010 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 368, 2023
4th African Regional Conference on Geosynthetics (GeoAfrica 2023)
Article Number 03010
Number of page(s) 20
Section EXTENDED ABSTRACTS TECHNICAL COMMITTEES’ WORKSHOP SESSIONS: Technical Committee on Soil Reinforcement
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202336803010
Published online 17 February 2023
  1. ISO 10318–1, Geosynthetics − Part 1: Terms and definitions. ISO, Geneve, Switzerland (2015). [Google Scholar]
  2. ISO/TR 18228–1, Design using geosynthetics − Part 1: General. ISO, Geneve, Switzerland (2021). [Google Scholar]
  3. N. Dixon, G. Fowmes, M. Frost, Global challenges, geosynthetic solutions and counting carbon, ICE Geos. Int., 24(5), pp 451–464 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  4. N. Touze, Healing the world: A geosynthetics solution, ICE Geos. Int., 28(1), pp. 1–31 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  5. EN 14475, Execution of special geotechnical Works – Reinforced fill, European Standard EN 14475:2006. CEN, Brussels, Belgium (2006). [Google Scholar]
  6. BS 8006–1. Code of practice for strengthened/reinforced soils and other fills (+A1:2016), BSI, UK. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  7. VSL Construction systems, VSoL® System, VSL International – a member of Bouygues construction, 08908 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. [Google Scholar]
  8. Officine Maccaferri SpA, Bologna, Italy. [Google Scholar]
  9. R.J. Bathurst, F.M. Naftchali, Geosynthetic reinforcement stiffness for analytical and numerical modelling of reinforced soil structures, Geot. & Geom., 49(4), pp. 921–940 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J.P. Giroud, R. Bonaparte, J.F. Beech, B.A. Gross, Design of soil layer-geosynthetic systems overlying voids, Geot. & Geom., 9(1) pp. 11–50 (1990). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. J.C. Blivet, J.P. Gourc, P. Villard, H. Giraud, M. Khay, A. Morbois, Design method for geosynthetic as reinforcement for embankment subjected to localized subsidence, in Proc. of the 7th Int. Conf. on Geosynthetics – Vol. 1, pp. 341–344, Lisse, France (2002). [Google Scholar]
  12. EBGEO, Recommendations for design and analysis of earth structures using geosynthetic reinforcements, DGGT, Essen, Germany (2011). [Google Scholar]
  13. F.M Naftchali, R.J. Bathurst, Influence of geosynthetic stiffness on analytical solutions for reinforced fill over void, ICE Geos. Int., (Ahead of Print) (2022). [Google Scholar]
  14. R.J. Bathurst, F.M. Naftchali, Influence of uncertainty in geosynthetic stiffness on deterministic and probabilistic analyses using analytical solutions for three reinforced soil problem, Geot. & Geom., 51(1), pp. 117–130 (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. PLAXIS, PLAXIS 2D Reference Manual, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  16. FLAC, Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua (FLAC) – User’s Guide, Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., Minneapolis, USA. [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Olivella, A. Gens, J. Carrera, E.E. Alonso, Numerical Formulation for a Simulator (CODE_BRIGHT) for the Coupled Analysis of Saline Media, Eng. Comp., 13(7), pp. 87–112 (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. EN 1997–3, Geotechnical design – Part 3: Geotechnical structures, European Standard EN 1997, CEN/TC 250, Brussels, Belgium (202x – under development). [Google Scholar]
  19. GECO Industrial Co. Ltd., Polymeric reinforcing strip FASTEN®, Jangan-myeon, Gyeonggi-do, 18580, Republic of Korea. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Brouthen, M.N. Houhou, I.P. Damians, Numerical study of the influence of the interaction distance, the polymeric strips pre-tensioning, and the soil-polymeric interaction on the performance of back-to-back reinforced soil walls, Infr. 7(2), (2022). [Google Scholar]
  21. I.P. Damians, R.J. Bathurst, A. Josa, A. Lloret, P.J.R. Albuquerque, Vertical facing loads in steel reinforced soil walls. ASCE J. of Geot. and Geoenv. Eng. 139(9), pp. 1419–1432 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. I.P. Damians, R.J. Bathurst, A. Josa, A. Lloret, Numerical study of the influence of foundation compressibility and reinforcement stiffness on the behavior of reinforced soil walls. Int. J. of Geot. Eng., 8(3), pp. 247–259 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Y. Yu, I.P. Damians, R.J. Bathurst, Influence of choice of FLAC and PLAXIS interface models on reinforced soil-structure interactions, Comp. & Geotech., 65, pp. 164–174 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. I.P. Damians, R.J. Bathurst, A. Josa, A. Lloret, Numerical analysis of an instrumented steel reinforced soil wall. ASCE Int. J. of Geom., 15(1), (2015). [Google Scholar]
  25. I.P. Damians, R.J. Bathurst, A. Josa, A. Lloret, Vertical facing panel-joint gap analysis for steel-reinforced soil walls. ASCE Int. J. of Geom., 16(4), (2016). [Google Scholar]
  26. I.P. Damians, R.J. Bathurst, E. Adroguer, A. Josa, A. Lloret, Environmental assessment of earth retaining wall structures. ICE Env. Geotech., 4(6), pp. 415–431 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. I.P. Damians, R.J. Bathurst, E. Adroguer, A. Josa, A. Lloret, Sustainability assessment of earth retaining wall structures. ICE Env. Geotech., 5(4), pp. 187–203 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. I.P. Damians, R.J. Bathurst, S. Olivella, A. Josa, A. Lloret, 3D modelling of strip reinforced MSE walls, Acta Geotech. 16, pp. 711–730 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. I.P. Damians, S. Olivella, R.J. Bathurst, A. Lloret, A. Josa, Modelling soil-facing interface interaction with continuum element methodology, Frontiers in Built Environment − Insights in Geotech. Eng. (2022). [Google Scholar]
  30. A.A. Moncada, I.P. Damians, S. Olivella, R.J. Bathurst, Modelling the effect of in-soil temperature and relative humidity on performance of PET strap soil reinforcement products, in Proc. of the 20th Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Geot. Eng., Sydney, Australia (2022). [Google Scholar]
  31. E. Gil, C. Serrano, C. Pereira, P. Osso, J., Lima, I.P. Damians, The D4R7 reinforced soil retaining walls in Bratislava, Slovakia, Int. J. of Geoeng. Case Histories, 7(2), pp. 13–33 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Hughes, N. Withers, D. Greenwood, A field trial of the reinforcing effect of a stone column in soil. Geotechnique, 25(1), pp. 31–44 (1975). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. K. Engelhardt, H. Golding, Field testing to evaluate stone column performance in a seismic area, Geotechnique, 25(1), pp. 61–69 (1975). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. C. Cengiz, E. Guler, Effects of geosynthetic encased column installation on the seismic response of soft clay beds, in Proc. of the 7th Eur. Geos. Conf., EuroGeo7, Warsaw, Poland (2021). [Google Scholar]
  35. S.W. Abusharar, J. Han, Two-dimensional deep-seated slope stability analysis of embankments over stone column-improved soft clay, Eng. Geol., 120(1), pp. 103–110 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. C. Cengiz, I.E. Kilic, E. Guler, On the shear failure mode of granular column embedded unit cells subjected to static and cyclic shear loads, Geot. & Geom., 47(2), pp. 193–202 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. S.R. Mohapatra, K. Rajagopal, J. Sharma, Direct shear tests on geosynthetic-encased granular columns, Geot. & Geom., 44(3), pp. 396–405 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. C. Cengiz, E. Guler, Shaking table tests on geosynthetic encased columns in soft clay, Geot. & Geom., 46(6), pp. 748–758 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. C. Cengiz, E. Güler, Seismic behavior of geosynthetic encased columns and ordinary stone columns, Geot. & Geom., 46(1), pp. 40–51 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Cengiz, C. and E. Guler, Load bearing and settlement characteristics of Geosynthetic Encased Columns under seismic loads. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020. 136: p. 106244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. J.G. Zornberg, N. Abu-Hejleh, T. Wang, Geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abutments, Geot. Fabrics Rep., 19(2), pp. 52–55 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  42. N. Abu-Hejleh, J.G. Zornberg, T. Wang, J. Watcharamonthein, Monitored displacements of unique geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abutments, ICE Geos. Int., 9(1), pp. 71–95 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  43. M. Adams, J. Nicks, T. Stabile, J. Wu, W. Schlatter, J. Hartmann, Geosyntheticreinforced soil integrated bridge system, FHWA-HRT-11–027, McLean, VA. (2011). [Google Scholar]
  44. A. Herold, Brückenwiderlager aus KBE-Kunststoffbewehrte Erde, Einsatzgebiete Und Anwendungsgrenzen, Sächsisches Textilforschungsinstitut Bautextilien-Symposium, Bautex 2006, Institut für Technische Textilien GmbH, Chemnitz, pp. 1–12 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  45. K.F. Bizjak, S. Lenart, S., Life cycle assessment of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge system–A case study, Geot. & Geom., 46(5), 543–558 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. J.K. Mitchell, W.C. Villet, Reinforcement of earth slopes and embankments, NCHRP Report (290), Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C. (1987). [Google Scholar]
  47. B.R. Christopher, S. Gill, J. Giroud, I. Juran, J.K. Mitchell, F. Schlosser, J. Dunnicliff, Reinforced soil structures. Design and construction guidelines – Vol. 1, FHWA-RD- 89–043, Washington, D.C. (1989). [Google Scholar]
  48. J.G. Zornberg, A.M. Morsy, B. Mofarraj, B.R. Christopher, D. Leshchinsky, J. Han,B.F. Tanyu, F.T. Gebremariam, P. Shen, Y. Jiang, Defining the boundary conditions for composite behavior of geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) structures, NCHRP, Project 24–41, Transport. Res. Board, Washington DC, October, 986 pp.(2018). [Google Scholar]
  49. M. Adams, J. Nicks, Design and construction guidelines for geosynthetic reinforced abutments and integrated bridge systems, FHWA-HRT-17–080, McLean, VA. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  50. M.P. Burke, Integral and semi-integral bridges, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, U.K., Ames, Iowa (2009). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.