Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 369, 2023
3rd International Conference on Environment Resources and Energy Engineering (ICEREE 2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01002 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Natural Resource Management and Environmental Control | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202336901002 | |
| Published online | 16 February 2023 | |
- L. He, J. Shen, and Y. Zhang, ‘Ecological vulnerability assessment for ecological conservation and environmental management’, J. Environ. Manage., vol. 206, pp. 1115–1125, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.059. [Google Scholar]
- B. Wang, S.-Y. Pan, R.-Y. Ke, K. Wang, and Y.-M. Wei, ‘An overview of climate change vulnerability: a bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science database’, Nat. Hazards, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 1649–1666, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11069-014-1260-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. C. Gallopín, ‘Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity’, Glob. Environ. Change, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 293–303, Aug. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Jiang, R. Li, Y. Shi, and L. Guo, ‘Natural and Political Determinants of Ecological Vulnerability in the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau: A Case Study of Shannan, China’, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., vol. 10, no. 5, Art. no. 5, May 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijgi10050327. [Google Scholar]
- Q. Zhang et al., ‘Dynamic vulnerability of ecological systems to climate changes across the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China’, Ecol. Indic., vol. 134, p. 108483, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108483. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Yang and X. Huang, ‘The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019’, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 3907–3925, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.5194/essd-13-3907-2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Q. He, M. Wang, K. Liu, K. Li, and Z. Jiang, ‘GPRChina Temp1km: a high-resolution monthly air temperature data set for China (1951–2020) based on machine learning’, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 3273–3292, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.5194/essd14-3273-2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- X. Hu, C. Ma, P. Huang, and X. Guo, ‘Ecological vulnerability assessment based on AHP-PSR method and analysis of its single parameter sensitivity and spatial autocorrelation for ecological protection – A case of Weifang City, China’, Ecol. Indic., vol. 125, p. 107464, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107464. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Q. Wang, S. Li, and R. Li, ‘Evaluating water resource sustainability in Beijing, China: Combining PSR model and matter-element extension method’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 206, pp. 171–179, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.057. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Lai et al., ‘Evaluation of ecological security and ecological maintenance based on pressure-stateresponse (PSR) model, case study: Fuzhou city, China’, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J., vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 734–761, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1080/10807039.2022.2081835. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. L. Saaty, ‘How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9–26, Sep. 1990, doi: 10.1016/03772217(90)90057-I. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Liu, R. Han, L. Tang, and X. Cheng, ‘An object– pressure–endurance–resilience system for assessing the vulnerability of coastal zone ecosystems’, Ecol. Indic., vol. 141, p. 109105, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Liu, W. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Q. Xu, and W. Li, ‘Risk Factor Detection and Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Geo-Detector and Random Forest Models: The 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi Earthquake’, Remote Sens., vol. 13, no. 6, Art. no. 6, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/rs13061157. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.