Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 369, 2023
3rd International Conference on Environment Resources and Energy Engineering (ICEREE 2023)
Article Number 01011
Number of page(s) 8
Section Natural Resource Management and Environmental Control
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202336901011
Published online 16 February 2023
  1. Gorge A J, Mikael R. Using three-sided dynamic game model to study regional cooperative governance of haze pollution from a government heterogeneity perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 16(4): 559-567. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jianxin Peng. haze literature review and economic analysis. Financial Economics, 2015(14): 68-71. [Google Scholar]
  3. Qianjiao Xie, Yuling Zhu, Jiaming Zhu, ect. Research on quantitative collection of haze tax based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Journal of Huaiyin Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 16(2): 113-118. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mingwei Hu. Economic analysis of haze. Economic Research Guide, 2013(16): 13-23. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hao Wang, Jian Gao, Hui Li. Characteristics of PM2.5 mass concentration in Beijing from 2007 to 2014. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2016, 29(6): 784-790. [Google Scholar]
  6. Eugene A M, Heather L M, Christopher A K. Greenhouse gas emissions form waste managementassessment of quantification method. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2011, 61(5): 480-493. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stephen W. Source apportionment of PM2.5 in the most polluted Central Plains Economic Region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, 28(3): 124-140. [Google Scholar]
  8. Walter C W. The Role of Industry in Air Pollution. Air Repair, 2012, 2(3): 122-124. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gorge A J, Mikael R. Using three-sided dynamic game model to study regional cooperative governance of haze pollution from a government heterogeneity perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 16(4): 559-567. [Google Scholar]
  10. Irwin L A, Baldock D. How to design fully cooperative policies to abate transboundary air pollution between two highly asymmetric regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2007, 27(8): 124-136. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sujit R, Vishnu R. Dynamical systmes and complex systems theory to study unsteady combustion. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2010, 10:1-18. [Google Scholar]
  12. Y Tiyapairat, E E Sajor. State simplification, heterogeneous causes of vegetation fires and implications on local haze management: case study in Thailand. Environment, Development. Sustainability, 2012, 14(6): 1047-1064. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ashby E, Olson M. Does the expansion of the joint prevention and control area improve the air quality?. Science of the Total Environment, 2011, 17(6): 3442. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gormley W. Investigating how governmentality and governance influence decision making on projects. Project Leadership and Society, 2010, 10(3): 1-10. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kamieniecki K, Kristin L, David B. Sustainable development: Our Common Future revisted. Global Environment Change, 2014, 26(7): 130-139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Xiaobin Zhang, Bo Yu. Grey correlation analysis of PM2.5 in Beijing from the perspective of social factors. Environmental Protection, 2020, 48(14): 6066. [Google Scholar]
  17. Xiaobin Zhang, Miao Ning, Bo Yu. Driving factors of PM2.5 pollution in Beijing based on Grange causality. Environmental Protection, 2020, 48(10): 59-64. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.