EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 369 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 369 (2023) 02001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 369, 2023
3rd International Conference on Environment Resources and Energy Engineering (ICEREE 2023)
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Renewable Energy Development and Planning
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202336902001
Published online 16 February 2023
  1. Qi Q X, Pan Y S, Shu L Y, et al. Theory and technical framework for multi-scale source prevention and control of coal-rock dynamic hazards in deep coal [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang Y, Tang S, Shi K. Risk assessment of coal mine water inrush based on PCA-DBN [J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-022-05473-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Vaziri V, Khademi H J, Sayadi A R. An integrated GIS-based approach for geohazards risk assessment in coal mines [J]. Environmental earth sciences, 2018, 77(1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-0177198-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sang Z B, Shen X, Tui S, Peng K, Qian H W, He S F. Identification and evaluation of human- caused risk factors in coal mines[J]. Coal Mine Safety, 2014, 45(09):232-234. https://doi.org/10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2014.09.069. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhou Y. Fuzzy evaluation of occupational disease hazard risk in underground coal mine system[J]. Coal mine safety, 2017, 48(04): 241-244. https://doi.org/10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2017.04.063. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li Y, Xu D, Shuai J. Real-time risk analysis of road tanker containing flammable liquid based on fuzzy Bayesian network [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 134(02):36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.11.033. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wu X G, Liu X, Chen H Y, et al. Safety Risk Assessment of Shield Crossing Existing Tunnel Based on Fuzzy Bayesian Evidence Theory [J]. Tunnel Construction (English and Chinese), 2021, 41 (05): 713-20. https://doi.org/10.3973/j.issn.20964498.2021.05.003. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu K, Zhong S, Wang J X, et al. Research on FPSO collision risk analysis method based on fuzzy fault tree and Bayesian network [J]. Ship Mechanics, 2022, 26 (04): 574-83. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2022.04.013. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang X, Wang T, Wang Q, et al. Evaluation of floor water inrush based on fractal theory and an improved analytic hierarchy process [J]. Mine Water and the Environment, 2017, 36(1): 8795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-016-0407-3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Li L, Liu D, Cai Y, et al. Coal structure and its implications for coalbed methane exploitation: a review [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2020, 35(1): 86-110. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03309 [Google Scholar]
  11. Kong W I., Zhao H H, Liu Q.L., and Zhou X. The use of sprayed seal in gas extraction boreholes: a review. Sprayed hole sealing technology for gas extraction drilling[J]. Industrial and Mining Automation, 2021, 47(12):19-24. https://doi.org/10.13272/j.issn.1671251x.2021050022. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang Y W, Jiang B F, Zhang YK. Fire prevention and suppression technology for high gas very soft and flammable coal seams under complex conditions[J]. Coal Mine Safety, 2013, 44(11):82-84. https://doi.org/10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2013.11.028. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fu S J, Fan Z Z, Zhang X F, et al. Study on the relationship between anomalous mine pressure appearance and gas gushing from extra-long working face [J]. Coal Engineering, 2019, 51(05) 139-142. https://doi.org/10.11799/ce201905032. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dutta P, Saikia B. Arithmetic operations on normal semi elliptic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their application in decision making [J]. Granular Computing, 2021, 6(1): 163-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-019-00175-5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lu Y, Wu J G, Shao S Z, et al. A Bayesian networkbased inference model for hazardous chemical road transport accidents [J]. Chinese Journal of Safety Science, 2022, 32(03): 174-182. https://doi.org/10.16265/j.cnki.issn10033033.2022.03.024. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.