Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 465, 2023
8th International Conference on Industrial, Mechanical, Electrical and Chemical Engineering (ICIMECE 2023)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 6
Section Symposium on Mechanical, Chemical, and Advanced Materials Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346501001
Published online 18 December 2023
  1. E. Armentani, R. Esposito, and R. Sepe, ―The effect of thermal properties and weld efficiency on residual stresses in welding,‖ J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng., vol. 20, no. 1–2, pp. 319–322, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. W. M. Thomas, E. D. Nicholas, J. C. Needham, M. G. Murch, P. Templesmith, and C. J. Dawes, ―Friction stir welding. International Patent Application No. PCT/GB92/02203 and GB Patent Application No. 9125978.8,‖ US Pat., no. 5, pp. 317–460, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Ugender, A. Kumar, and A. S. Reddy, ―Experimental investigation of tool geometry on mechanical properties of friction stir welding of AA 2014 aluminium alloy,‖ Procedia Mater. Sci., vol. 5, pp. 824–831, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Tavassolimanesh and A. A. Nia, ―A new approach for manufacturing copper-clad aluminum bimetallic tubes by friction stir welding (FSW),‖ J. Manuf. Process., vol. 30, pp. 374–384, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Liu and M. Kulak, ―A new paradigm in the design of aluminum alloys for aerospace applications,‖ in Materials Science Forum, 2000, pp. 127–142. [Google Scholar]
  6. W. R. Longhurst et al., ―Development of friction stir welding technologies for in-space manufacturing,‖ Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 90, pp. 81–91, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Y.-H. Zhao, S.-B. Lin, F.-X. Qu, and L. Wu, ―Influence of pin geometry on material flow in friction stir welding process,‖ Mater. Sci. Technol., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 45–50, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. C. F. Silva, D. F. O. Braga, M. A. V De Figueiredo, and P. Moreira, ―Ultimate tensile strength optimization of different FSW aluminium alloy joints,‖ Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 79, pp. 805–814, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Hoyos and M. C. Serna, ―Basic tool design guidelines for friction stir welding of aluminum alloys,‖ Metals (Basel)., vol. 11, no. 12, p. 2042, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Patel, K. D. Bhatt, and V. Mehta, ―Influence of tool pin profile and welding parameter on tensile strength of magnesium alloy AZ91 during FSW,‖ Procedia Technol., vol. 23, pp. 558–565, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. R. M. Vaidyanathan, N. Sivaraman, M. Patel, M. M. Woldegioris, and T. A. Atiso, ―A review on the effects of shoulder diameter to pin diameter (D/d) ratio on friction stir welded aluminium alloys,‖ Mater. Today Proc., vol. 45, pp. 4792– 4798, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Mehta, A. Arora, A. De, and T. DebRoy, ―Tool geometry for friction stir welding—optimum shoulder diameter,‖ Metall. Mater. Trans. A, vol. 42, pp. 2716–2722, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. P. S. Kumar and M. S. Chander, ―Effect of tool pin geometry on FSW dissimilar aluminum alloys-(AA5083 \& AA6061),‖ Mater. Today Proc., vol. 39, pp. 472–477, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Kumar, H. Kumar, S. Kumar, and J. S. Chohan, ―Effects of tool pin profile on the formation of friction stir processing zone in AA1100 aluminium alloy,‖ Mater. Today Proc., vol. 48, pp. 1594–1603, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Kumar, S. S. Bhadauria, V. Sharma, and M. Kumar, ―Effect on microstructure and mechanical properties of single pass friction stir welded aluminium alloy AA-7075-T651 joint,‖ Mater. Today Proc., vol. 80, pp. 40–47, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  16. ISO, ―PN-EN ISO 25239-5,‖ Frict. stir welding. Alum. Part 5 Qual. Insp. Requir., 2012. [Google Scholar]
  17. A. S. M. H. Commite, ―ASM Metals Handbook, Vol 09 Metallography and Microstructures,‖ ASM Int., 2004. [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Tamadon, A. Baghestani, and M. E. Bajgholi, ―Influence of WC-based pin tool profile on microstructure and mechanical properties of AA1100 FSW welds,‖ Technologies, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 34, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.