EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 467 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 467 (2023) 01030 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 467, 2023
9TH-ICCC – The 9th International Conference on Climate Change
Article Number 01030
Number of page(s) 8
Section Impact of Depletion or Enhance of a Capability of Resources of Air, Water, Soil, and Vegetation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346701030
Published online 20 December 2023
  1. R. Straumann, “Hovedoppgave for cand.oecon-graden Exporting Pollution? Calculating the embodied emissions in trade for Norway,” 2003. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Personal, R. Archive, and A. Sen, “M P RA Intra-Industry Trade in Dirty Goods and Environmental Policies Intra-Industry Trade in Dirty Goods and Environmental Policies,” 2013. [Google Scholar]
  3. S. S. Rosenthal and W. C. Strange, “The Determinants of Agglomeration,” J. Urban Econ., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 191–229, 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.2001.2230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. E. Akbostanci, G. I. Tunç, and S. Türüt-Aşik, “Pollution haven hypothesis and the role of dirty industries in Turkey’s exports,” Environ. Dev. Econ., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 297–322, 2007, DOI: 10.1017/S1355770X06003512. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Mani and D. W. Prdei, “IN SEARCH OF POLLUTION HAVENS? DIRTY INDUSTRY IN THE WORLD ECONOMY, 1960-1995,” 1997. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Mahajan and K. Majumdar, “Environmental policy stringency and comparative advantage of environmental sensitive goods: a study of textile exports in G20 countries,” Benchmarking, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 2924–2951, 2022, DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-06-2021-0304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Cagatay and H. Mihci, “Degree of environmental stringency and the impact on trade patterns,” J. Econ. Stud., 2006, DOI: 10.1108/01443580610639884. [Google Scholar]
  8. D. K. Kellenberg, “An empirical investigation of the pollution haven effect with strategic environment and trade policy,” J. Int. Econ., vol. 78, no. 2, 2009, DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2009.04.004. [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Cherniwchan, B. R. Copeland, and M. S. Taylor, “Trade and the environment: New methods, measurements, and results,” Annu. Rev. Econom., vol. 9, pp. 59–85, 2017, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-economics-063016-103756. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. W. Du and M. Li, “Influence of environmental regulation on promoting the low-carbon transformation of China’s foreign trade: Based on the dual margin of export enterprise,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 244, p. 118687, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118687. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. T. Aktaş, “Did Globalization Promote Dirty Industries in Turkey? 1,” 2015. [Online]. Available: www.ijbssnet.com [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Lu, “Do Environmental Regulations Influence the Competitiveness of Pollution-Intensive Products?,” Front. Econ. China, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 276–298, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11459-010-0014-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Tisdell, “Globalisation and sustainability: environmental Kuznets curve and the WTO,” Ecol. Econ., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 185–196, 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00234-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. S. Wilson, T. Otsuki, M. Sewadeb, and T. World Bank, “Dirty Exports and Environmental Regulation Do Standards Matter to Trade?,” 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Indriya and T. Widodo, “M P RA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Do Pollution Havens Exist? Evidence from East Asia Do Pollution Havens Exist? Evidence from East Asia,” 2011. [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Lafay, “The measurement of revealed comparative advantages,” International trade modelling: [the papers published in this book were selectedfrom among the best communications presented at the XXVII Conference of the Applied Econometric Association on International Trade held in Montreal, in September 1989]. Chapman & Hall, London [u.a.], pp. 209–234, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Fennell, J. Driver, C. Bataille, and S. J. Davis, “Going net zero for cement and steel,” Nature, vol. 603, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Gross, “The challenge of decarbonizing heavy transport,” Energy Clim., no. October, pp. 1–28, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  19. D. N. Gujarati, Basic econometrics: (McGraw) (Hill). 2004. [Google Scholar]
  20. D. A. Dickey and W. A. Fuller, “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., vol. 74, no. 366, pp. 427–431, Oct. 1979, DOI: 10.2307/2286348. [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Kwiatkowski, P. C. B. Phillips, P. Schmidt, and Y. Shin, “Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?,” J. Econom., vol. 54, no. 1-3, pp. 159–178, 1992, DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wolf, M. J., Emerson, J. W., Esty, D. C., de Sherbinin, A., Wendling, Z. A., et al. 2022 Environmental Performance Index. New Haven: CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Igini, “5 Biggest Environmental Issues in India in 2023,” 2023. https://earth.org/environmental-issues-in-india/# (accessed Oct. 20, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  24. BertelsmannStiftung, “Environmental Policies,” Sustainable Governance Indicators, 2022. https://www.sgi-network.org/2022/Sustainable_Policies/Environmental_Policies (accessed Sep. 20, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  25. ITA, “Kazakhstan - Country Commercial Guide,” International Trade Administration, 2022. https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/kazakhstan-environmental-technologies (accessed Sep. 02, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  26. I. Parry, B. Shang, P. Wingender, N. Vernon, and T. Narasimhan, “Climate Mitigation in China: Which Policies are Most Effective?,” SSRN Electron. J., 2021, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2882584. [Google Scholar]
  27. WorldBank, “China: Fighting Air Pollution and Climate Change through Clean Energy Financing,” 2020. https://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2020/06/21/china-fighting-air-pollution- and-climate-change-through-clean-energy-financing (accessed Oct. 02, 2023). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.