Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 467, 2023
9TH-ICCC – The 9th International Conference on Climate Change
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 04008 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Carbon Footprint, Greenhouse Gas Emission, Recycle and Reuse Energy Research | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346704008 | |
| Published online | 20 December 2023 | |
- F.H. Abanda, L. Byers, An investigation of the impact of building orientation on energy consumption in a domestic building using emerging BIM (Building Information Modelling), Energy, 97 (2016) 517–527. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Carbonaroa, Y. Casconeb, S. Fantuccib, V. Serrab, M. Perinob, M. Duttoc, Energy Assessment Of A PCM-Embedded Plaster: Embodied Energy Versus Operational Energy, (2016). [Google Scholar]
- C.K. Chau, T.M. Leung, W.Y. Ng, A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings, Appl Energy, 143 (2015) 395–413. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Cleveland, C. Morris, Dictionary of Energy (Expanded Edition, 2009). [Google Scholar]
- J. Davison, D. Densley Tingley, Design for deconstruction and material reuse, Energy, 164 (2011) 195–204. [Google Scholar]
- T. Ibn-Mohammed, R. Greenough, S. Taylor, L. Ozawa-Meida, A. Acquaye, Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings - A review of current trends, Energy Build, 66 (2013) 232–245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B.E. 15978 British Standards Institution, Sustainability of construction works Assessment of environmental performance of buildings-Calculation method, (2011). [Google Scholar]
- L. Aye, T. Ngo, R.H. Crawford, R. Gammampila, P. Mendis, Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules, Energy Build, 47 (2012) 159–168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. Guan, M. Walmsely, G. Chen, Life Cycle Energy Analysis of Eight Residential Houses in Brisbane, Australia, Procedia Eng., 121 (2015) 653–661. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A.B. Larriba, A.B. Larriba, Analysis and Evaluation Of 3 Rd Draft Criteria for Buildings and Next Steps, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. JRC Europe Commission, UE. I (2010) 9–18. [Google Scholar]
- M. Dixit, J. Fernandez-Solis, S. Lavy, C. Culp, Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16 (2012) 3730–3743. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Moncaster, K. Symons, A method and tool for ‘cradle to grave’ embodied carbon and energy impacts of UK buildings in compliance with the new TC350 standards, Energy Build, 66 (2013) 514–523. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Carolina, S. Monteiro, Assessing Initial Embodied Energy in Building Structures using LCA Methodology, (2015). [Google Scholar]
- Kotaji S., Schuurmans S., Edwards S., Life-Cycle Assessment in Building and Construction: A state-of-the-art report, (2003), (n.d.). [Google Scholar]
- S. Sattary, D. Thorpe, Optimizing embodied energy of building construction through bioclimatic principles, (2012). [Google Scholar]
- S. Schimschar, K. Blok, T. Boermans, A. Hermelink, Germany’s path towards nearly zero-energy buildings-Enabling the greenhouse gas mitigation potential in the building stock, Energy Policy, 39 (2011) 3346–3360. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Tarabieh, M. Khorshed, Optimizing Evaluation Methods for the Embodied Energy and Carbon Management of Existing Buildings in Egypt, Buildings, 9 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- T. Ramesh, R. Prakash, K.K. Shukla, Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview, Energy Build, 42 (2010) 1592–1600. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.