Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 468, 2023
ICST UGM 2023 - The 4th Geoscience and Environmental Management Symposium
Article Number 04003
Number of page(s) 5
Section Geo-Resources and Geo-Hazard
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346804003
Published online 21 December 2023
  1. I. Fustos, R. Abarca-del-Rio, A. Ávila, and R. Orrego, “A Simple Logistic Model to Understand The Occurrence of Flood Events Into The Biobio River Basin in Central Chile,” J. Flood Risk Manag., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17–29, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Sidik, “Lahan Pertanian di Tiga Kecamatan di Bantul Berpotensi Terendam Banjir,” AntaraNews, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. O. Rodrigues, “Pengembangan smart environment di Kampung Wisata Jetisharjo RW. 07, Yogyakarta,” ARTEKS J. Tek. Arsit., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 25–32, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Reid, G. B. Pimentel, and M. Castillo, “Decent work in nature-based solutions 2022,” 2022. [Google Scholar]
  5. U. N. Water, “2018 UN World Water Development Report, Nature-based Solutions for Water,” 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Sikora-Fernandez and D. Stawasz, “The Concept of Smart City in The Theory and Practice of Urban Development Management,” Rom. J. Reg. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 86–99, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Sutriadi, “Defining Smart City, Smart Region, Smart Village, And Technopolis As An Innovative Concept in Indonesia's Urban And Regional Development Themes To Reach Sustainability,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 2018, p. 12047. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. M. Kalcic, I. Chaubey, and J. Frankenberger, “Defining Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Hydrologic Response Units (HRUs) by field boundaries,” Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 69–80, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. I. H. Jati and P. B. Santoso, “Prediction of Flood Areas Using The Logistic Regression Method (Case Study of The Provinces Banten, DKI Jakarta, and West Java),” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2019, p. 12087. [Google Scholar]
  10. Q. Yan, T. Iwasaki, A. Stumpf, P. Belmont, G. Parker, and P. Kumar, “Hydrogeomorphological Differentiation Between Floodplains and Terraces,” Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 218–228, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Raska et al., “Identifying Barriers for Nature-based Solutions in Flood Risk Management: An Interdisciplinary Overview Using Expert Community Approach,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 310, p. 114725, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Ruangpan et al., “Nature-based Solutions for Hydro-Meteorological Risk Reduction: A State-of-The-Art Review of The Research Area,” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. , vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 243–270, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Murray, J. Bush, J. Haschenburger, and R. French, “Technical and Field Guide: Management Practices For Natural Waterways,” Cent. Water Res. Univ. Texas San Antonio. 95pp, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  14. E. S. Lee, D. K. Lee, S. H. Kim, and K. C. Lee, “Design Strategies to Reduce Surface Water Flooding in A Historical District,” J. Flood Risk Manag., vol. 11, pp. S838–S854, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Ozment, G. Ellison, and B. Jongman, “Nature - Based Solutions for Disaster Risk Management: Booklet,” 2022. [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Guerrero, D. Haase, and C. Albert, “Locating spatial opportunities for nature-based solutions: A river landscape application,” Water, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 1869, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.