Open Access
Issue |
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 381, 2023
International Scientific and Practical Conference “Development and Modern Problems of Aquaculture” (AQUACULTURE 2022)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01005 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Agriculture, River Ecosystems and Environment | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338101005 | |
Published online | 14 April 2023 |
- Ahmaed Jdries, H., Zabusschagne, N., and Korsten, Z. Screening rhizobacteria for biological control of sorghoom in Ethiopia ||Biogical Control -2007.-V.40, Jssul - P97 - 106. [Google Scholar]
- Alfano, J., Jevis Jvey, M.Z., C., Bos, IJB. Miller, S.A., Madden, Z.V., Kamoun, S.and Hoitink, M.A. J. Systemic modulation of gene expression in tomato by Trichoderma hamatum 382 ||Phytopathology -97-2007 p.429-437 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bashan. V. and de Bashan, Z.E Proctection of tomato seedling against infection by Pseudomonas syringae pv.tomato by using the pleant growt promoting bacterium Azospirillium Brasilense ||Appj.Envizon Microbiol -68-2022. P2637-2643 [Google Scholar]
- Howell, C.R. Understanding the mecha nisms employed by Trichderma virens to effect biological control of cotton diseases. ||Phytopathology-96-2006-p178-180 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harman. GE. Myths and dogmas of biocontrol: changes in perceptions derived from research on Trichoderma harzianum T-22 ||Plant Disease-84-2000-p377-393 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harman G.E Overview of mechanisms and uses of Trichoderma spp. || Phytopathology 96-2016-p., 190-194 [Google Scholar]
- Trotel-Aziz, p., Gouderchet M., Biahianti, S. and Aziz, A. Characterization of new bacterial biocontrol agents Acinetobacter, Bacillus, Pantoea and Experina, Bot.-2018-N64.-P21-32 [Google Scholar]
- Jppolito, A.and Nigro, F. Jmpact of prenarvest application of biological control agents on postharvest diseases of fresh fruits and vegetables ||Grop Prot. -19-2020-p.715-723. [Google Scholar]
- Wooksey D.A and More Z.W. Biological control of crown gall with Fungigal and bacterial antagonists. Phytopatology, 2008, 70, №6, 506-509 [Google Scholar]
- Francesco Vinale, Krishnapillai Sivasitham param, Emilio L. Ghislarberti, Roberta Marra, Sheridan L. Woo and Matteo Lorito Trichoderma – plant – phatogen interaction || Soil Biology Biochemistry – 40.–2018-p-1-10/ [Google Scholar]
- Sharma P/K Dey S.K and Shahal V.P.S In vitro in ternna between phytopthogens and two Azotobacter species. Jnadian phytopathol, 2001, 39 №1, 117-119. [Google Scholar]
- Kolomiets e. I, Romanovskaya T. V, Edor N. A “biological preparations to replace chemical ones” || Protection and quarantine of plants. Moscow, 2006.- 10 p. 18-20 [Google Scholar]
- Lamar T.E., Polyanskaya L.M., Kozhevin P.A., Zvyagintsev D.G. Methods for increasing the number of bacteria in the soil. Microbiology, 2004 Vol. 53 No. 5 pp. 830-832. [Google Scholar]
- Shumilina D.V., Voinova T.M., Javakhia V.G. Microbial factor third base for the creation of new bio-pesticides. || Protection and quarantine of plants. Moscow 2006. No. 10 p.20 -21 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.