Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 385, 2023
2023 8th International Symposium on Energy Science and Chemical Engineering (ISESCE 2023)
Article Number 02008
Number of page(s) 6
Section Green Chemical Technology and Energy Saving and Emission Reduction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338502008
Published online 04 May 2023
  1. Yang L., Xia J.J., Shen Q. Establishing target-oriented energy consumption quotas for buildings. Utilities Policy, 41: 57–66 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Wilson C., Crane L., Chryssochoidis G. Why do homeowners renovate energy efficiently? Contrasting perspectives and implications for policy. Energy Research & Social Science, 7: 12–22 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang B.Z., Guo H.D., Zhao Q.Q., Zhang H.Y. Benefit coordination of loan financing of energy service company in existing building energy saving. Building Science, 31: 142–147 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  4. Xu P.P., Chan E.H. ANP model for sustainable Building Energy Efficiency Retrofit (BEER) using Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) for hotel buildings in China. Habitat International, 37: 104–112 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu H.M., Hu M.Y., Zhang X.Y. Energy Costs Hosting Model: The most suitable business model in the developing stage of Energy Performance Contracting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 2553–2566 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Limaye D.R., Limaye E.S. Scaling up energy efficiency: the case for a Super ESCO. Energy Efficiency, 4(2): 133–144 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Qian D., Guo J. Research on the energy-saving and revenue sharing strategy of ESCOs under the uncertainty of the value of Energy Performance Contracting Projects. Energy Policy, 73: 710–721 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldman C.A., Hopper N.C., Osborn J.G. Review of US ESCO industry market trends: an empirical analysis of project data. Energy policy, 33(3): 387–405 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Xu P.P., Chan E.H., Qian Q.K. Success factors of energy performance contracting (EPC) for sustainable building energy efficiency retrofit (BEER) of hotel buildings in China. Energy policy, 39(11): 7389–7398 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mills E., Kromer S., Weiss G., Mathew P. From volatility to value: analysing and managing financial and performance risk in energy savings projects. Energy Policy, 34(2): 188–199 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Xing G.Y., Qian D., Guo J. Research on the participant behavior selections of the energy performance contracting project based on the robustness of the shared savings contract. Sustainability, 8(8): 730 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Qian D., Guo J. Research on the energy-saving and revenue sharing strategy of ESCOs under the uncertainty of the value of Energy Performance Contracting Projects. Energy Policy, 73: 710–721 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shang T.C., Zhang K., Liu P.H., Chen Z.W., Li X.P., Wu X. What to allocate and how to allocate?—Benefit allocation in Shared Savings Energy Performance Contracting Projects. Energy, 91: 60–71 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. XU X.Y., WU H.H. Contract decisions analysis of guaranteed savings energy performance contracting based on game theory. Operations Research and Management Science, 24(3): 112 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu H.M., Zhang X.Y., Hu M.Y. Game-theory-based analysis of Energy Performance Contracting for building retrofits. Journal of cleaner production, 231: 1089–1099 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.