Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 385, 2023
2023 8th International Symposium on Energy Science and Chemical Engineering (ISESCE 2023)
Article Number 02018
Number of page(s) 5
Section Green Chemical Technology and Energy Saving and Emission Reduction
Published online 04 May 2023
  1. Baykara S. Z.. Hydrogen: a brief overview on its sources, production and environmental impact. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2018;43:10605–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews J., Shabani B. Where does hydrogen fit in a sustainable energy economy? Procedia Eng 2012;49:15–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Suleman F. Environmental impact assessment and comparison of some hydrogen production options[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(21):6976–6987. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartholomew C. H., Farrauto R.J. Fundamentals of Industrial Catalytic Processes (Bartholomew/Fundamentals) || Homogeneous, Enzyme, and Polymerization Catalysis[M]. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wismann, Sebastian T, Engbaek, et al. Electrified methane reforming: A compact approach to greener industrial hydrogen production. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wahid, Abdul M, Hosseini, et al. Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: Promising green energy carrier for clean development[J]. Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pashchenko D. Experimental investigation of reforming and flow characteristics of a steam methane reformer filled with nickel catalyst of various shapes[J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2019, 185(APR.):465–472. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ashraf M. A., Sanz O., Montes M., et al. Insights into the effect of catalyst loading on methane steam reforming and controlling regime for metallic catalytic monoliths[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(26):11778–11792. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang A. C., Lee K. Y.. Biogas reforming by the honeycomb reactor for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy [Google Scholar]
  10. Singh S., Nguyen T. D., Siang T. J., Phuong P. T., Huy Phuc N. H.,Truong Q. D., Lam S. S., Vo DVN. Borondoped Ni/SBA-15 catalysts with enhanced coke resistance and catalytic performance for dry reforming of methane. J Energy Inst 2020;93(1):31e42. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sun Y., Zhang G., Xu Y., Zhang R.. Dry reforming of methane over Co-Ce-M/AC-N catalyst: effect of promoters (Ca and Mg) and preparation method on catalytic activity and stability. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2019;44(41):22972e82. [Google Scholar]
  12. Maurice I. StewartJr. PhD, PE, in Surface Production Operations (Third Edition), Volume 2, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  13. H.P.A. Calis, J. Nijenhuis, B. Paikert, F.M. Dautzenberg, C.M. Vaden, CFD modelling and experimental validation of pressure drop and flow profile in a novel structured catalyst packing, Chem. Eng.Sci. 56 (2001) 1713–1720. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Winterberg, E. Tsotsas, Correlations for effective heat transport coefficients in beds packed with cylindrical particles, Chem. Eng. Sci. 55 (2000) 5937–5943. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.