Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 385, 2023
2023 8th International Symposium on Energy Science and Chemical Engineering (ISESCE 2023)
Article Number 03004
Number of page(s) 6
Section Thermochemical Engineering and Waste Treatment
Published online 04 May 2023
  1. Sanchit Saran Agarwal, Mitthan Lal Kansal. Risk based initial cost assessment while planning a hydropower project. Energy Strategy Reviews, Volume 31, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2020.100517. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yu, Chunxia, Zhiqin Zou, Yifan Shao, Fengli Zhang. An integrated supplier selection approach incorporating decision maker’s risk attitude using ANN, AHP and TOPSIS methods. Kybernetes 49 2019:2263–2284. DOI: 10.1108/K-04-2019-0223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Feng Zhongkai, Liu Shuai, Niu Wenjing, Jiang Zhiqiang, Luo Bin, Miao Shumin. Multi-Objective Operation of Cascade Hydropower Reservoirs Using TOPSIS and Gravitational Search Algorithm with Opposition Learning and Mutation. Water 11, no. 10, 2019: 2040. DOI: 10.3390/w11102040. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang Liangjing, Research on Site Selection Model of Hydropower Station Based on Entropy-TOPSIS Method. North China Electric Power University, 2020. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Otay Irem, Jaller Miguel. A Novel Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Method for the Wind Power Farm Location Selection Problem. 1 Jan. 2020:6193–6204. DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-189089. [Google Scholar]
  6. Du Yumin, Chen Wenwu, Cui Kai, Zhang Kewen. Study on Damage Assessment of Earthen Sites of the Ming Great Wall in Qinghai Province Based on Fuzzy-AHP and AHP-TOPSIS. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 14, 2020:903–916. DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2019.1576241. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang Hualong, Zhong Shanshan. Entropy-TOPSIS based multi-attribute decision making for dam type selection in water conservancy and hydropower projects. YELLOW RIVER, 2021, 43 (S1): 119–121+124. 22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2021.S1.046. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. G. P. Cikarge, N. A. Masruroh, M. K. Ridwan. Selection of Wind Farm Locations using AHP and TOPSIS Methods (Case Study: Cilacap Regency), 2021 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronics, Intelligent Manufacture and Industrial Automation (ICAMIMIA), 2021: 239–246. DOI: 10.1109/ICAMIMIA54022.2021.9807812. [Google Scholar]
  9. Liang Jiahao, Wang Zhenbei, Zhu Hongtao, Sun Dezhi. Research on AHP-TOPSIS technology applicability evaluation method based on water pollution treatment target demand. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology 12, 2022:390–398. DOI: 1074-991X(2022)12:2<390:JYSWRZ>2.0.TX;2-R. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang Xia, Duan Qingquan. Improved AHP-TOPSIS model for the comprehensive risk evaluation of oil and gas pipelines. Pet. Sci. 16, 2019:1479–1492. DOI: 10.1007/s12182-019-00365-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.