EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 385 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 385 (2023) 03009 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 385, 2023
2023 8th International Symposium on Energy Science and Chemical Engineering (ISESCE 2023)
Article Number 03009
Number of page(s) 6
Section Thermochemical Engineering and Waste Treatment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338503009
Published online 04 May 2023
  1. Guang, W. (2020) Research on treatment methods of crop straw. Southern Agricultural Machinery, 51(05): 90. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tianpeng, Z. (2021) Current situation of comprehensive utilization of straw in Heilongjiang province and suggestions and countermeasures. Northeast Agricultural University. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yuanyuan, D., Hao, J., Jiangtao, D. (2014) Research progress of anaerobic mixed fermentation of straw. China Biogas, 32(5): 6. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hua, X., Longyun, F., Guang, Y. (2015) Research progress of biogas production by straw anaerobic fermentation. Shandong Agricultural Science, 47(12): 5. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhong, W., Zhang, Z., Luo, Y. (2011) Effect of biological pretreatments in enhancing corn straw biogas production. Bioresource Technology: Biomass, Bioenergy, Biowastes, Conversion Technologies, Biotransformations, Production Technologies, (24):102. [Google Scholar]
  6. Benkun, Q., Xiangrong, C., Yi, S., Yinhua, W. (2011). Enzyme adsorption and recycling during hydrolysis of wheat straw lignocellulose, 102(3), 2881–2889. [Google Scholar]
  7. Longyu, Z., Yanfei, H., Wu, L., Sen, Y., Qing, L., Ziniu, Y. (2012). Biodiesel production from rice straw and restaurant waste employing black soldier fly assisted by microbes. Energy, 47(1), 225–229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Xing, Y., Qikai, Z., Li, P. (2009) Research progress of pretreatment technology and resource utilization of corn stalks. Liaoning Agricultural Science, (06): 35–37. [Google Scholar]
  9. Xue, L. (2022) Research progress of anaerobic fermentation technology of straw pretreatment. Shaanxi Agricultural Science, 66(11): 4. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wenhong, L., Daxiong, W., Gaoxin, L., Jun, P., Meilan, W., Baozhang, L. (1997) Pretreatment conditions of enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw cellulose to produce sugar. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), (03): 47–50. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhou, J., Yan, B. H., Wang, Y. (2016) Effect of steam explosion pretreatment on the anaerobic digestion of rice straw. Rsc Advances, 6. [Google Scholar]
  12. Shiyang, F. (2016) Effects of hydrothermal pretreatment and acid/alkali-hydrothermal pretreatment on sugar production and anaerobic fermentation of corn straw. Beijing Forestry University. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ma, H., Liu, W.-W., Chen, X. Wu. (2009). Enhanced enzymatic saccharification of rice straw by microwave pretreatment. Bioresource Technology, 100(3), 1279–1284. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yanqing, C., Yabin, G., Jing, T., Lian, H. (2021) Discussion and experimental study on straw pretreatment technology. China Biogas, 39(02): 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, X., Yupeng, W., Chuang, Z., Wei, L. (2019) Effects of different concentrations of phosphoric acid pretreatment on anaerobic fermentation of straw. Heilongjiang Science, 10(14): 24–26. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yan, G. (2013) Study on anaerobic fermentation characteristics of straw under different chemical pretreatment conditions. Northwest A&F University, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fengjie, C., Xiangfei, L., Yuguang, Z., Huayou, C., Wenjing, S., Daming, H. (2013) Effect of NaOH pretreatment on solid-state anaerobic digestion of corn stalk. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 7(05): 1919–1924. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jing, L., Feilai, Y., Jingjing, X., Xin, L., Chunyi, J., Shenglan, L., Li, Y., Xuejiao M. (2011) Optimization of saccharification process of corn stalk pretreated with ammonia. Journal of Chongqing Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 28(05): 77–80. [Google Scholar]
  19. Caibin, W., Yongmei, Z., Puzheng, Z., Yaping, W., Zhengfeng, S., Xuewu, Yu., Tianyi, F. Hao. (2016) Determining N supplied sources and N use efficiency for peanut under applications of four forms of N fertilizers labeled by isotope (15) N. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15(02): 432–439. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Castoldi, R., Bracht, A., Morais, G. (2014) Biological pretreatment of Eucalyptus grandis sawdust with white-rot fungi: Study of degradation patterns and saccharification kinetics. Chemical Engineering Journal. [Google Scholar]
  21. Murmanis, L., Highley, T., Palmer, J. (1988) The action of isolated brown-rot cell-free culture filtrate, H2O2-Fe++, and the combination of both on wood. Wood Science and Technology. [Google Scholar]
  22. Xiao, X., Chi, C., Kai, Y., Chuang, X. (2021) Research progress on cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei. China biotechnology, 41(01): 52–61. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yibing, L., Cuili, Z., Gaihe, Y., Dongsheng, B., Lili, C., Guangxin, R., Yongzhong, F. (2009) The influence of temperature on the characteristics of anaerobic digestion of feces and corn stalk. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 37(01): 66–72. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yongze, W., Li, Y., Mingsheng, S., Ting, Z., Dongsheng, L., Jinhua, W. (2009) Study on the technological conditions of anaerobic fermentation of cotton straw to produce biogas. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology. (01): 251–252. [Google Scholar]
  25. Xiaoping, P., Mingfen, N., Saiyue, W. (2010) Discussion on Influencing Factors of Anaerobic Fermentation of Crop Straw. Scientific and Technological Innovation and Industrial Development (Volume A)-Proceedings of the Seventh Shenyang Scientific Academic Annual Conference and Hunnan High-tech Industry Development Forum: 410–413. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.