Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 385, 2023
2023 8th International Symposium on Energy Science and Chemical Engineering (ISESCE 2023)
Article Number 04013
Number of page(s) 7
Section Polymer Chemistry and Chemical Research Progress
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338504013
Published online 04 May 2023
  1. Li Jianzhong, Guo Bincheng, Zheng Min, et al. Main types, geological features and resource potential of tight sandstone gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(4):607–615. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhao Jingzhou. Conception, classification and resource potential of unconventional hydrocarbons[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(3):393–406. [Google Scholar]
  3. Qiao Bo, Xia Shouchun, Ai Qinglin, et al. Accumulation character of the upper Paleozoic tight sandston gas in ordos basin[J]. Scinece Technology and Engineering, 2018, 18(13):42–49. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tang Jianglin, Wang Shengwei, Yang Qinxiong, et al. Geological characteristics and prospects for exploration of coalbed methane in Wushen coalfield, Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2009, 37(02):22–25. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu Xinshe, Xi Shengli, Zhou Huanshun. Features of upper Paleozoic coalbed methane reservoir in eastern Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2007,(01):37–40. [Google Scholar]
  6. Fu Jinhua, Wei Xinshan, Ren Junfeng, et al. Gas exploration and developing propect in Ordos BasinActa[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006(06):1–4+13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Qin Bo, Cao Binfeng, Zhou Jinsong, et al. Availability Identification of Tight Gas Sandston Reservoirs and Quantitative Assessment:A case study from the first member of the Upper Paleozoic Shanxi Formation in the southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2019, 37(02):403–415. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wu Meng, Zhu Chao, Qin Yunhu, et al. Geological Evaluation Method of Tight Sandstone Gas Exploitation Potential in Shanxi Formation in Linxing Area[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(04):991–1002. [Google Scholar]
  9. Li Hao, Liu Shuanglian, Ge Xiang, et al. Logginf evaluation of the Xujiahe formation in the Yuanba area[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2021, 60(5):856–866. [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu Guoqiang. Challenges and countermeasures of log evaluation in unconventional petroleum exploration[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(5):891–902. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ou Fang, Yang Huiting, Huang Xiaobing. Application of logging interpretation method for reef shoal reservoir in Feixianguan Formation of X Gas Field[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5):744–752. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhu Jian, Fan Xibin, Gao Yang, et al. Logging evaluation for original oil saturation of glutenite reservoir of W group in MH Depression[J]. Fault-Block Oil&Gas Field, 2021, 28(4):509–513. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chu Cuijin, Xia Zhilin, Yang Zhiqiang. Logging identification and evaluation of tight sandstone gas in the southern Yanchuan block[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(2):131–138. [Google Scholar]
  14. Diao Haiyan. Rock mechanical properties and brittleness evaluation of shale reservoir[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 29(9):3300–3306. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhu Yan, Han Xiangyi, Yue Xinxin, et al. Research and application of brittleness logging evaluation method to tight sandstone reservoirs:Exemplified by Weibei oil-field in Ordos Basin[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 45(5):1239–1247. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.