EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 386 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 386 (2023) 04010 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 386, 2023
Annual International Scientific Conferences: GIS in Central Asia – GISCA 2022 and Geoinformatics – GI 2022 “Designing the Geospatial Ecosystem”
Article Number 04010
Number of page(s) 11
Section GIS in Geodesy and Cartography
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338604010
Published online 12 May 2023
  1. J. Dou, K.T. Chang, S. Chen, A. Yunus, J.K. Liu, H. Xia, Z. Zhu, Automatic CaseBased Reasoning Approach for Landslide Detection: Integration of Object-Oriented Image Analysis and a Genetic Algorithm, J. Remote Sensing, 7, 4318-42 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Guzzetti, A. Carrara, M. Cardinali, P. Reichenbach, Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy J. Geomorphology, 31, 181-216 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Guzzetti, A.C. Mondini, M. Cardinali, F. Fiorucci, M. Santangelo, K-T Chang, Landslide inventory maps: new tools for an old problem, J. Earth-Science Reviews, 112, 42-66 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Stumpf, N. Kerle, Object-oriented mapping of landslides using Random Forests, J. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 2564-77 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Juliev, M. Mergili, I. Mondal, B. Nurtaev, A. Pulatov, J. Hübl, Comparative analysis of statistical methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Bostanlik District, Uzbekistan, J. Science of The Total Environment (2018) [Google Scholar]
  6. Z. Chen, D. Song, M. Juliev, H. R Pourghasemi, Landslide susceptibility mapping using statistical bivariate models and their hybrid with normalized spatial-correlated scale index and weighted calibrated landslide potential model, J. Environ Earth Sci., 80, 324 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. I. Mondal, S. Thakur, M. Juliev, T. K. De, Comparative analysis of forest canopy mapping methods for the Sundarban biosphere reserve, West Bengal, India, J. Environ Dev Sustain, 23, 15157-82 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. I. Mondal, S. Thakur, M. Juliev, J. Bandyopadhyay, T.K. De, Spatio-temporal modelling of shoreline migration in Sagar Island, West Bengal, India, J. Coast Conserv, 24, 50 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and and Recovery (GFDRR), Central Asia and Caucasus Disaster Risk Management Initiative (CAC DRMI) (2009) [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Juliev, A. Pulatov, J. Hubl, Natural hazards in mountain regions of Uzbekistan: A review of mass movement processes in Tashkent province, Int. J. Scientific & Engineering Research, 8, 1102-8 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Juliev, A. Pulatov, S. Fuchs, J. Hübl, Analysis of Land Use Land Cover Change Detection of Bostanlik District, Uzbekistan, Polish J. Environmental Studies, 28, 323542 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Khasanov, M. Juliev, U. Uzbekov, I. Aslanov, I. Agzamova, N. Normatova, S. Islamov, G. Goziev, S. Khodjaeva, N. Holov, Landslides in Central Asia: a review of papers published in 2000–2020 with a particular focus on the importance of GIS and remote sensing techniques, J. GeoScape, 15, 134-45 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Gafurova, M. Juliev, Soil Degradation Problems and Foreseen Solutions in Uzbekistan, J. Regenerative Agriculture, ed D Dent and B Boincean (Cham: Springer International Publishing) 59-67 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. T.R. Martha, N. Kerle, V. Jetten, C.J.V. Westen, K.V. Kumar, Characterising spectral, spatial and morphometric properties of landslides for semi-automatic detection using object-oriented methods, J. Geomorphology, 116, 24-36 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Lu, P. Mausel, E. Brondízio, E. Moran, Change detection techniques, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 25, 2365-401 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Alikhanov, M. Juliev, S. Alikhanova, I. Mondal, Assessment of influencing factor method for delineation of groundwater potential zones with geospatial techniques. Case study of Bostanlik district, Uzbekistan, J. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 12, 100548 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Moosavi, A. Talebi, B. Shirmohammadi, Producing a landslide inventory map using pixel-based and object-oriented approaches optimized by Taguchi method, J. Geomorphology, 204, 646-56 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Hölbling, C. Eisank, F. Albrecht, F. Vecchiotti, B. Friedl, E. Weinke, A. Kociu, Comparing Manual and Semi-Automated Landslide Mapping Based on Optical Satellite Images from Different Sensors, J. Geosciences, 7, 37 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. B. Feizizadeh, T. Blaschke, D. Tiede, M. H. R. Moghaddam, Evaluating fuzzy operators of an object-based image analysis for detecting landslides and their changes, J. Geomorphology, 293, 240-54 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. I.V. Belolipov, D. Zaurov, S.W. Eisenman, The Geography, Climate and Vegetation of Uzbekistan, Medicinal Plants of Central Asia: Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan, ed S W Eisenman, D E Zaurov and L Struwe (New York, NY: Springer New York), 5-7 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Gerts, M. Juliev, A. Pulatov, Multi-temporal monitoring of cotton growth through the vegetation profile classification for Tashkent province, Uzbekistan, J. GeoScape, 14, 62-9 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Niyazov, B. Nurtaev, Modern Seismogenic Landslides Caused by the Pamir-Hindu Kush Earthquakes and Their Consequences in Central Asia, J. Landslide Science and Practice: Volume 5: Complex Environment, ed C Margottini, P Canuti and K Sassa (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 343-8 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S. K. McFEETERS, The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 17, 1425-32 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Immitzer, C. Atzberger, Early Detection of Bark Beetle Infestation in Norway Spruce (Picea abies, L.) using WorldView-2, J. Photogrammetrie Fernerkundung Geoinformation, 51-67 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Toscani, M. Immitzer, C. Atzberger, Wavelet-based texture measures for objectbased classification of aerial images, J. pfg, 105-21 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. T. Blaschke, B. Feizizadeh, D. Holbling, Object-Based Image Analysis and Digital Terrain Analysis for Locating Landslides in the Urmia Lake Basin, Iran, IEEE J. Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7, 4806-17 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Michel, D. Youssefi, M. Grizonnet, Stable Mean-Shift Algorithm and Its Application to the Segmentation of Arbitrarily Large Remote Sensing Images, J. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 53, 952-64 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Inglada, E. Christophe, The Orfeo Toolbox remote sensing image processing software, J. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 733-6 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  29. W-T. Ng, M. Meroni, M. Immitzer, S. Böck, U. Leonardi, F. Rembold, H. Gadain, C. Atzberger, Mapping Prosopis spp. with Landsat 8 data in arid environments: Evaluating effectiveness of different methods and temporal imagery selection for Hargeisa, Somaliland, Int. J. Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 53, 7689 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  30. G. M. Foody, Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment, J. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80, 185-201 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. K.C. Devkota, A.D. Regmi, H.R. Pourghasemi, K. Yoshida, B. Pradhan, I.C. Ryu, M.R. Dhital, O.F. Althuwaynee, Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling–Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya, J. Natural Hazards, 65, 135-65 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. I. Aslanov, K. Sh, O. Sh, A. Jumanov, Z. Jabbarov, I. Jumaniyazov, N. Namozov, Evaluation of soil salinity level through using Landsat-8 OLI in Central Fergana valley, Uzbekistan, J. E3S Web of Conferences, 258, (2021) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.