Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 388, 2023
The 4th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2022)
Article Number 01012
Number of page(s) 6
Section Sustainable Infrastucture, Industry, Architecture, and Food Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338801012
Published online 17 May 2023
  1. S. Goli, A. Bheemeshwar Reddy, K. S. James, V. Srinivasan, Economic independence and social security among India’s elderly, Economic and Political Weekly 54, 39, pp. 32–41 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  2. V. Orlov, O. Khamidov, V. Poliakova, V. Shylova, The problem of decentralization of public power in the context of territorial’s independence, Proceedings of the III International Scientific Congress Society of Ambient Intelligence 2020 (ISC-SAI 2020) 129, pp. 370–377 https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200318.046 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  3. A. B. Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, N. O. Ndubisi, B. M. Roman Pais Seles, Sustainable development in Asian manufacturing SMEs: progress and directions, International J. Production Economics 225 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107567 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. N. Nursini, Micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) and poverty reduction: empirical evidence from Indonesia, Development Studies Research 7, 1, pp. 153–166 https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2020.1823238 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. T. N. Krishnan, H. Scullion, Talent management and dynamic view of talent in small and medium enterprises, Human Resource Management Review 27, 3, pp. 431–441 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr. 2016.10.003 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Cowling, W. Liu, A. Ledger, N. Zhang, What really happens to small and medium-sized enterprises in a global economic recession? UK evidence on sales and job dynamics, International Small Business J.: Researching Entrepreneurship 33, 5, pp. 488–513 https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242 613512513 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Abraham, M. Kaliannan, A. V. Mohan, S. Thomas, A review of SMEs recruitment and selection dilemma: finding a ‘fit’, The J. Developing Areas 49, 5, pp. 335–342 https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2015.0058 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. O. Sondakh, Measuring organizational performance: a case study of food industry SMEs in Surabaya-Indonesia, International J. Scientific Research and Management 5, 12, pp. 7681–7689 https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v5i12.15 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. J. R. Wilson, Fundamentals of systems ergonomics/human factors, Applied Ergonomics 45, 1, pp. 5–13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.021 (2014) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Z. Gani, M. M. Zamberi, M. H. Teni, A review of ergonomics towards productivity 7399, pp. 306–311 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  11. X. Li, G. Fan, A. Abudan, M. Sukkarieh, N. Inyang, M. Gül, M. El-rich, M. Al-hussein, Ergonomics and physical demand analysis in a construction manufacturing facility, in 5th International/11th Construction Specialty Conference, December 2020 https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0076405 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  12. S. P. Singh, M. K. Singh, M. K. Singh, U. Ekka, Ergonomics for gender friendly farm equipment to enhance better human-machine interaction, RASSA J. Science for Society 1, 1-2, pp. 54–59 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Polášek, M. Bureš, M. Šimon, Comparison of digital tools for ergonomics in practice, Procedia Engineering 100, pp. 1277–1285 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Lukiyanto, M. Wijayaningtyas, Gotong royong as social capital to overcome micro and small enterprises’ capital difficulties, Heliyon 6, 9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04879 (2020) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Hermawan, Amirullah, Metode penelitian bisnis: pendekatan kuantitatif & kualitatif (2016) [Google Scholar]
  16. N. F. Mohamad Salleh, E. Hani Sukadarin, Human factor pineapple plantations, MATEC Web of Conferences 150, pp. 1–8 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Górny, Human factor and ergonomics in essential requirements for the operation of technical equipment, Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 449–454 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  18. N. M. Ali, R. Jangga, M. Ismail, S. N. Mat, Influence of leadership styles in creating quality work culture, Procedia Economics and Finance 31, 15, pp. 161–169 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01143-0 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Thatcher, P. Waterson, A. Todd, N. Moray, P. Taylor, N. Moray, State of science: ergonomics and global issues, Ergonomics 0139, 0–1 https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2017.1398845 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Gajda, Professional adaptation of new employees, System Safety: Human-Technical Facility–Environment 1, 1, pp. 929–938 https://doi.org/10.2478/czoto-2019-0118 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. F. M. Olmos-Vega, D. H. Dolmans, C. Guzman-Quintero, R. E. Stalmeijer, P. W. Teunissen, Unravelling residents’ and supervisors’ workplace interactions: an intersubjectivity study, Medical Education 52, 7, pp. 725–735 https://doi.org/10.11 11/medu.13603 (2018) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. P. A. García-Tudela, M. P. Prendes-Espinosa, I. María, Smart learning environments and ergonomics: an approach to the state of the question, J. New Approaches in Educational Research 9, 2, pp. 245–258 https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.562 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Caffaro, M. Roccato, M. Micheletti Cremasco, E. Cavallo, An ergonomic approach to sustainable development: the role of information environment and social-psychological variables in the adoption of agri-environmental innovations, Sustainable Development 27, 6, pp. 1049–1062 https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1956 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. K. Benmoussa, M. Laaziri, S. Khoulji, M. L. Kerkeb, A. El Yamami, AHP-based approach for evaluating ergonomic criteria, Procedia Manufacturing 32, pp. 856–863 https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.promfg.2019.02.294 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.