Open Access
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 388, 2023
The 4th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2022)
Article Number 03005
Number of page(s) 6
Section E-Business Sustainability
Published online 17 May 2023
  1. H. Byström, “Blockchains, Real-time Accounting, and the Future of Credit Risk Modeling,” Ledger, vol. 4, pp. 40–47, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Alles, G. Brennan, A. Kogan, and M. A. Vasarhelyi, “Continuous Monitoring of Business Process Controls: A Pilot Implementation of a Continuous Auditing System at Siemens,” Contin. Audit., pp. 219–246, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. A. Vasarhelyi, M. Alles, S. Kuenkaikaew, and J. Littley, “The acceptance and adoption of continuous auditing by internal auditors: A micro analysis,” Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 267–281, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Jans and M. Hosseinpour, “How active learning and process mining can act as Continuous Auditing catalyst,” Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst., vol. 32, no. January 2017, pp. 44–58, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. K. A. Torkura, M. I. H. Sukmana, F. Cheng, and C. Meinel, “Continuous auditing and threat detection in multi-cloud infrastructureNo Title,” Comput. Secur., vol. 102, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Eulerich, C. Georgie, and A. Schmidt, “Continuous Auditing and Risk-Based Audit Planning—An Empirical Analysis,” J. Emerg. Technol. Account., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 141–155, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. L. E. Westphal, Technology strategies for economic development in a fast changing global economy, vol. 11, no. 4–5. 2002. [Google Scholar]
  8. ADB, “INNOVATE INDONESIA Through, Unlocking Growth Transformation, Technological,” 2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. R. A. Stebbins, “Exploratory Research,” The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Publication Ltd., pp. 327–329, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Eulerich and A. Kalinichenko, “The current state and future directions of continuous auditing research: An analysis of the existing literature,” J. Inf. Syst., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 31–51, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  11. AICPA, Audit Analytics and Continuous Audit: Looking Toward the Future. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. G. Alles, A. Kogan, and M. A. Vasarhelyi, “Putting Continuous Auditing Theory into Practice: Lessons from Two Pilot Implementations,” J. Inf. Syst., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 195–214, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Y. Chan and M. A. Vasarhelyi, “Innovation and practice of continuous auditing,” Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 152–160, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Flowerday, A. W. Blundell, and R. Von Solms, “Continuous auditing technologies and models: A discussion,” Comput. Secur., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 325–331, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Z. Rezaee, R. Elam, and A. Sharbatoghlie, “Continuous auditing: The audit of the future,” Manag. Audit. J., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 150–158, 2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Du and S. Roohani, “Meeting Challenges and Expectations of Continuous Auditing in the Context of Independent Audits of Financial Statements,” Int. J. Audit., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 133–146, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Masli, G. F. Peters, V. J. Richardson, and J. M. Sanchez, “Examining the Potential Benefits of Internal Control Monitoring Technology,” Account. Rev., vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 1001–1034, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. B. I. Davidson, N. K. Desai, and G. J. Gerard, “The Effect of Continuous Auditing on the Relationship between Internal Audit Sourcing and the External Auditor’s Reliance on the Internal Audit Function,” J. Inf. Syst., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 41–59, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  19. I. Malaescu and S. G. Sutton, “The reliance of external auditors on internal auditors,” J. Inf. Syst., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 95–114, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Kvale, “The Qualitative Research Interview: A Phenomenological and a Hermeneutical Mode of Understanding,” J. Phenomenol. Psychol., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 171–196, 1983. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. L. A. Palinkas, S. M. Horwitz, C. A. Green, J. P. Wisdom, N. Duan, and K. Hoagwood, “Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research,” Adm. Policy Ment. Heal. Serv. Res., no. 42, pp. 533–544, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Noy, “Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research,” Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 327–344, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. H. J. Rubin and I. S. Rubin, Qualitative Interviewing The art of hearing data. SAGE Publication Ltd., 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Delloitte, “Continuous Monitoring and Continous Auditing: From Idea to Implementation,” 2010. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.