Open Access
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 388, 2023
The 4th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2022)
Article Number 03011
Number of page(s) 8
Section E-Business Sustainability
Published online 17 May 2023
  1. IPCC, “Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,” Cambridge, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. A. R. Diamante, R. R. Tan, D. C. Foo, D. K. Ng, K. B. Aviso, and S. Bandyopadhyay, “Unified pinch approach for targeting of carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems with multiple time periods and regions,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 71, pp. 67–74, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Deegan, M. Rankin, and J. Tobin, “An Examination of the Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosures of BHP from 1983-1997: A Test of Legitimacy Theory,” Accounting, Audit. Account. J., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 312–343, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. R. Belkaoui, Accounting Theory: Teori Akuntansi, 5th ed. Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  5. Berthelot, Sylvie, and A.-M. Robert, “Climate Change Disclosure: An examination of Canadian Oil and Gas Firms,” vol. 5, pp. 106–123, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  6. Z. Luo, R. Dubey, T. Papadopoulos, B. Hazen, and D. Roubaud, “Explaining environmental sustainability in supply chains using graph theory,” Comput. Econ., vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1257–1275, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. IPCC, “IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,” Cambridge, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  8. L. H. Martinez, “Post Industrial Revolution human activity and climate change: Why the United States must implement mandatory limits on industrial Greenhouse Gas emissions,” Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 403-421, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Lin, D. Fridley, H. Lu, L. Price, and N. Zhou, “Has coal use peaked in China: Near-term trends in China’s coal consumption,” Energy Policy, vol. 123, pp. 208–214, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Okereke, “An exploration of motivations, drivers and barriers to carbon management: The uk ftse 100,” Eur. Manag. J., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 475–486, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Z. L. Liu, T. D. Anderson, and J. M. Cruz, “Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 218, no. 3, pp. 602–613, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Dipa Kalyani Sujata, S. Bianca Sardjono, and S. Putri Hendratno, “Esport Ecosystem, Financial Behavior, and Carbon Emissions in Indonesian Urban Area,” 2022 4th Asia Pacific Inf. Technol. Conf., pp. 123–130, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Cotter, N. Lokman, and M. M. Najah, “Voluntary disclosure research: which theory is relevant?,” J. Theor. Account. Res., 2011. [Google Scholar]
  14. J. S. Rigg, Advancing research methodology in the African context: Techniques, methods, and designs, 10th ed. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. V. Villas, T. D. L. Macedo-Soares, and G. M. Russo, “Bibliographical research method for business administration studies: a model based on scientific journal ranking,” BAR-Brazilian Adm. Rev., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 139–159, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Moleong, L., Qualitative Research Methodology, Revision. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  17. W. Liao, Y. Fan, and C. Wang, “How does COVID-19 affect the implementation of CORSIA?,” J. Air Transp. Manag., vol. 99, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Z. Chishti and A. Sinha, “Do the shocks in technological and financial innovation influence the environmental quality?,” Evid. from BRICS Econ. Technol. Soc., vol. 68, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Cheng, T. Chen, and Q. Chen, “Cost-reducing strategy or emission-reducing strategy? The choice of low-carbon decisions under price threshold subsidy,” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., vol. 157, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Basse Mama and R. Mandaroux, “Do investors care about carbon emissions under the European Environmental Policy?,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 268–283, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. S. Liu and J. H. Yang, “A longitudinal analysis of corporate greenhouse gas disclosure strategy,” Corp. Gov. Int. J. Bus. Soc., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 317–330, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  22. P. Kurnia, E. Darlis, and A. A. Putra, “Carbon emission disclosure, good corporate governance, financial performance, and firm value,” J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus., vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 223–231, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. V. Palea and F. Drogo, “Carbon emissions and the cost of debt in the eurozone: The role of public policies, climate-related disclosure and corporate governance,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 2953–2972, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. B. Xue, Z. Zhang, and P. Li, “Corporate environmental performance, environmental management and firm risk,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1074–1096, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. E. Morgan, T. J. Foxon, and A. Tallontire, “‘I prefer 30°’?: Business strategies for influencing consumer laundry practices to reduce carbon emissions,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 190, pp. 234–250, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. L. Fanning and D. W. O’Neill, “The Wellbeing–Consumption paradox: Happiness, health, income, and carbon emissions in growing versus non-growing economies,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 212, pp. 810–821, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Shahbaz, D. Balsalobre-Lorente, and A. Sinha, “Foreign direct Investment–CO2 emissions nexus in Middle East and North African countries: Importance of biomass energy consumption,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 217, pp. 603-614, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. E. F. E. A. Mills, K. Zeng, and M. A. Baafi, “The economy-energy-environment Nexus in IMF’s Top 2 biggest economies: a TY approach,” J. Bus. Econ. Manag., vol. 21, no. 1,pp. 1–22, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  29. A. E. Baba and A. Bismark, “Comparing the values of economic, ecological and population indicators in Highand Low-Income Economies,” Econ. Reg., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 72–85, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  30. Q. Wang and F. Zhang, “The effects of trade openness on decoupling carbon emissions from economic growth–evidence from 182 countries,” J. Clean. Prod., p. 279, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Singhania and N. Saini, “Demystifying pollution haven hypothesis: Role of FDI,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 123, pp. 516–528, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. A. E. Raftery and H. Sevcikova, "Probabilistic population forecasting: Short to very long-term,” Int. J. Forecast., 2021. [Google Scholar]
  33. C. Magazzino, A. A. Alola, and N. Schneider, “The trilemma of innovation, logistics performance, and environmental quality in 25 topmost logistics countries: A quantile regression evidence,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 322, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  34. I. Alvarez-Meaza, E. Zarrabeitia-Bilbao, R. M. Rio-Belver, and G. Garechana-Anacabe, “Green scheduling to achieve green manufacturing: Pursuing a research agenda by mapping science,” Technol. Soc., vol. 67, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  35. M. Shahbaz, M. A. Destek, K. Dong, and Z. Jiao, “Time-varying impact of financial development on carbon emissions in G-7 countries: Evidence from the long history,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 171, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  36. F. Haque and C. G. Ntim, “Environmental policy, sustainable development, governance mechanisms and environmental performance,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 415–435, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. S. A. R. Khan, C. Jian, Y. Zhang, H. Golpîra, A. Kumar, and A. Sharif, “Environmental, social and economic growth indicators spur logistics performance: from the perspective of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation countries,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 214, pp. 1011–1023, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. S. Asongu and N. M. Odhiambo, “Trade and FDI thresholds of CO2 emissions for a Green economy in sub-Saharan Africa,” Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 227–245, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  39. Y. Ling et al., “Carbon emissions in China’s thermal electricity and heating industry: An input-output structural decomposition analysis,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 329, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  40. J. Foramitti, I. Savin, and J. C. J. M. van den Bergh, “Regulation at the source? Comparing upstream and downstream climate policies,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 172, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  41. P. Bolton and M. Kacperczyk, “Do investors care about carbon risk?,” J. financ. econ., vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 517–549, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. A. K. Saha, T. Dunne, and R. Dixon, “Carbon disclosure, performance and the green reputation of higher educational institutions in the UK,” J. Account. Organ. Chang., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 604–632, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. P. Castro, C. Gutiérrez-López, M. T. Tascón, and F. J. Castaño, “The impact of environmental performance on stock prices in the green and innovative context,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 320, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  44. Q. Mei, J. Li, E. Ursavas, S. X. Zhu, and X. Luo, “Freight transportation planning in platform service supply chain considering carbon emissions,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 240, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  45. S. R. Paramati, M. S. Alam, S. Hammoudeh, and K. Hafeez, “Long-run relationship between R&D investment and environmental sustainability: Evidence from the European Union member countries,” Int. J. Financ. Econ., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 5775–5792, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. M. Nippa, S. Patnaik, and M. Taussig, “MNE responses to carbon pricing regulations: Theory and evidence,” J. Int. Bus. Stud., vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 904–929, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. P. Dutta and A. Dutta, “Impact of external assurance on corporate climate change disclosures: new evidence from Finland,” J. Appl. Account. Res., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 252–285, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  48. S. P. Nathaniel and N. Adeleye, “Environmental preservation amidst carbon emissions, energy consumption, and urbanization in selected African countries: implication for sustainability,” J. Clean. Prod., p. 285, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  49. X. Gong, Y. Liu, and X. Wang, “Dynamic Volatility Spillovers Across Oil and Natural Gas Futures Markets Based on a Time-Varying Spillover Method,” Int. Rev. Financ. Anal., vol. 76, p. 101790, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. S. M. Bae, M. A. K. Masud, M. H. U. Rashid, and J. D. Kim, “Determinants of climate financing and the moderating effect of politics: evidence from Bangladesh,” Sustain. Accounting, Manag. Policy J., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 247–272, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  51. Y. Daryanto and H. Wee, “Three-Echelon Green Supply Chain Inventory Decision for Imperfect Quality Deteriorating Items,” Oper. Supply Chain Manag. An Int. J., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 26–38, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  52. Y. Daryanto and B. Christata, “Optimal order quantity considering carbon emission costs, defective items, and partial backorder,” Uncertain Supply Chain Manag., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 307–316, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. R. Karim and K. Nakade, “An integrated location-inventory model for a spare part’s supply chain considering facility disruption risk and CO2 emission,” J. Ind. Eng. Manag., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 87–119, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  54. N. B. Cheikh, Y. B. Zaied, and J. Chevallier, “On the nonlinear relationship between energy use and CO2 emissions within an EKC framework: Evidence from panel smooth transition regression in the MENA region,” Res. Int. Bus. Financ., vol. 55, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  55. K. Feng, K. Hubacek, and K. Song, “Household carbon inequality in the US,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 278, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  56. W. V. Siregar, A. Hasibuan, Khairawati, D. Setiawan, and W. Widarjo, “Households Carbon Emissions in Aceh, Indonesia: Regulator Perspective,” Qual. Access to Success, vol. 22, no. 184, pp. 111–114, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  57. L. Chithambo, I. Tingbani, G. A. Agyapong, E. Gyapong, and I. S. Damoah, “Corporate voluntary greenhouse gas reporting: Stakeholder pressure and the mediating role of the chief executive officer,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1666–1683, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. W. Qian, J. Hörisch, and S. Schaltegger, “Environmental management accounting and its effects on carbon management and disclosure quality,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 174, pp. 1608–1619, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. M. Varsei, K. Christ, and R. Burritt, “Distributing wine globally: financial and environmental trade-offs,” Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 410–428, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Z. V Mózner, “A consumption-based approach to carbon emission accounting–sectoral differences and environmental benefits,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 42, pp. 83–95, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Pinto Taborga, C., A. Lusa, and A. M. Coves, “A proposal for a green supply chain strategy,” J. Ind. Eng. Manag., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 445–465, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  62. P. Warwick and C. Ng, “The ‘cost’of climate change: how carbon emissions allowances are accounted for amongst European Union companies,” Aust. Account. Rev., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 54–67, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. K. L. Christ, R. Burritt, and M. Varsei, “Towards environmental management accounting for trade-offs,” Sustain. Accounting, Manag. Policy J., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 428–448, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Z. Vetőné, “Applying consumers onsibility principle in evaluating environmental load of carbon emissions,” Soc. Econ., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 131–144, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  65. P. H. Leal, A. C. Marques, and J. A. Fuinhas, “How economic growth in Australia reacts to CO2 emissions, fossil fuels and renewable energy consumption,” Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 696–713, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. S. R. Paramati, M. S. Alam, and C. K. M. Lau, “The effect of tourism investment on tourism development and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from the EU nations,” J. Sustain. Tour., vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1587–1607, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. Y. Li and M. Zhang, “Green manufacturing and environmental productivity growth,” Ind. Manag. Data Syst., vol. 118, no. 6, pp. 1303–1319, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. W. Qian and K. Xing, “Linking environmental and financial performance for privately owned firms: some evidence from Australia,” J. Small Bus. Manag., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 330–347, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. Z. Zhang, “Making the transition to a low-carbon economy: the key challenges for China,” Asia Pacific Policy Stud., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 187–202, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. L. Benz, S. Paulus, J. Scherer, J. Syryca, and S. Trück, “Investors’ carbon risk exposure and their potential for shareholder engagement,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 282–301, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. I. G. K. A. Ulupui, D. Maruhawa, U. Purwohedi, and Kiswanto, “Carbon Emission Disclosure, Media Exposure, Environmental Performance, Characteristics of Companies: Evidence from Non Fincancial Sectors in Indonesia,” J. Account. Audit. Res. Pract., vol. 2020, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  72. D. Zhang, S. Zou, F., Li, and L. Zhou, “Green supply chain network design with economies of scale and environmental concerns,” J. Adv. Transp., vol. 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  73. K. H. Lee and B. Min, “Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 108, pp. 534–542, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  74. M. Shahbaz, M. A. Nasir, E. Hille, and M. K. Mahalik, “UK’s net-zero carbon emissions target: Investigating the potential role of economic growth, financial development, and R&D expenditures based on historical data (1870–2017),” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 161, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  75. Z. Li, S. Shao, X. Shi, Y. Sun, and X. Zhang, “Structural transformation of manufacturing, natural resource dependence, and carbon emissions reduction: Evidence of a threshold effect from China,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 206, pp. 920–927, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  76. O. Boiral, J. F. Henri, and D. Talbot, “Modeling the impacts of corporate commitment on climate change,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 495–516, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  77. Y. Zhang, S. A. R. Khan, A. Kumar, H. Golpîra, and A. Sharif, “Is tourism really affected by logistical operations and environmental degradation? An empirical study from the perspective of Thailand,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 227, pp. 158–166, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  78. Y. Bouchery and J. Fransoo, “Cost, carbon emissions and modal shift in intermodal network design decisions,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 164, pp. 388–399, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  79. C. Haslam, J. Butlin, T. Andersson, J. Malamatenios, and G. Lehman, “Accounting for carbon and reframing disclosure: A business model approach,” Account. Forum, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 200–211, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  80. B. Doda, C. Gennaioli, A. Gouldson, D. Grover, and R. Sullivan, “Are corporate carbon management practices reducing corporate carbon emissions?,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 257–270, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  81. X. Liu, X. Yu, and S. Gao, “A quantitative study of financing efficiency of low-carbon companies: A three-stage data envelopment analysis,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 858–871, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  82. M. Shahbaz, G. Gozgor, P. K. Adom, and S. Hammoudeh, “The technical decomposition of carbon emissions and the concerns about FDI and trade openness effects in the United States,” Int. Econ., vol. 159, pp. 56–73, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.