EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 388 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 388 (2023) 03036 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 388, 2023
The 4th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2022)
Article Number 03036
Number of page(s) 8
Section E-Business Sustainability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338803036
Published online 17 May 2023
  1. C. Mouro and A. P. Duarte, “Organisational Climate and Pro-environmental Behaviours at Work: The Mediating Role of Personal Norms,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, no. September, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635739. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Wesselink, V. Blok, and J. Ringersma, “Pro-environmental behaviour in the workplace and the role of managers and organisation,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 168, pp. 1679–1687, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Smit et al., “Toward a sustainable, inclusive, growing future: The role of business,” McKinsey Co., no. November 2022, pp. 1–32, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/featured insights/sustainable inclusive growth/toward a sustainable inclusive growing future the role of business/toward-a-sustainable-inclusive-growing-future-the-role-of-business.pdf?shouldIndex=false [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Wesselink, V. Blok, and J. Ringersma, “Pro-environmental behaviour in the workplace and the role of managers and organisation,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 168, no. August, pp. 1679–1687, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Y. Yusliza et al., “An investigation of pro-environmental behaviour and sustainable development in Malaysia,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 17, pp. 1–21, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12177083. [Google Scholar]
  6. L. K. Lades, K. Laffan, and T. O. Weber, “Do economic preferences predict pro-environmental behaviour?,” Ecol. Econ., vol. 183, no. January, p. 106977, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106977. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Ruepert et al., “Environmental considerations in the organizational context: A pathway to pro-environmental behaviour at work,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 17, pp. 59–70, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Li, L. Zhao, S. Ma, S. Shao, and L. Zhang, “What influences an individual’s pro-environmental behavior? A literature review,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 146, no. March, pp. 28–34, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. S. pei Tsai, “Innovative behaviour of knowledge workers and social exchange attributes of financial incentive: implications for knowledge management,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1712–1735, 2018, doi: 10.1108/JKM-07-2017-0293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. C. L. Chen and C. H. Tsai, “Marine environmental awareness among university students in Taiwan: a potential signal for sustainability of the oceans,” Environ. Educ. Res., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 958–977, 2016, doi: 10.1080/13504622.2015.1054266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Bin Saeed, B. Afsar, S. Hafeez, I. Khan, M. Tahir, and M. A. Afridi, “Promoting employee’s proenvironmental behavior through green human resource management practices,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 424–438, 2019, doi: 10.1002/csr.1694. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Omarova and S. J. Jo, “Employee Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Impact of Environmental Transformational Leadership and GHRM,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14042046. [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Foster et al., “Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behaviour in the Workplace,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1–18, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14084420. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Inoue and P. Alfaro-Barrantes, “Pro-environmental behavior in the workplace: A review of empirical studies and directions for future research,” Bus. Soc. Rev., vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 137–160, 2015, doi: 10.1111/basr.12051. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Hanna, S. Wijesinghe, I. Paliatsos, C. Walker, M. Adams, and A. Kimbu, “Active engagement with nature: outdoor adventure tourism, sustainability and wellbeing,” J. Sustain. Tour., vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1355–1373, 2019, doi: 10.1080/09669582.2019.1621883. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Z. Zhang, H. Shi, and T. Feng, “Why Good Employees Do Bad Things: The Link between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Workplace Deviance,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 22, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215284. [Google Scholar]
  17. R. P. Setyaningrum, “Achieving employee environmental performance through perceived organizational support towards the environment: a mediated-moderation analysis,” J. Siasat Bisnis, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 17–30, 2022, doi: 10.20885/jsb.vol27.iss1.art2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. N. Anwar, N. H. Nik Mahmood, M. Y. Yusliza, T. Ramayah, J. Noor Faezah, and W. Khalid, “Green Human Resource Management for organisational citizenship behaviour towards the environment and environmental performance on a university campus,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 256, p. 120401, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120401. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Lin, A. A. Effendi, and Q. Iqbal, “The Mechanism Underlying the Sustainable Performance of Transformational Leadership: Organizational Identification as Moderator,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 23, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su142315568. [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Barclay, D., Thompson, R., dan Higgins, “The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use an Illustration,” Technol. Stud., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 285–309, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  21. W. J. Boone, M. S. Yale, and J. R. Staver, Rasch analysis in the human sciences. 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4. [Google Scholar]
  22. B. Sumintono, Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, November 2. Trim Komunikata, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and J. F. Hair, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2. [Google Scholar]
  24. I. Ghozali, Partial Least Squares Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.2.9. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2021. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.