EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 388 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 388 (2023) 04001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 388, 2023
The 4th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2022)
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 6
Section Technological Influence on Society and Applied Social Sciences to Support Sustainable Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338804001
Published online 17 May 2023
  1. E. Roza, Maritim Indonesia, kemewahan yang luar biasa, Website Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia (2017) [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Ambari, Pemerintah keluarkan data resmi wilayah kelautan Indonesia, apa saja yang terbaru? Mongabay.co.id (2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Satumanatpan, R. Pollnac, Factors influencing the well-being of small-scale fishers in the gulf of Thailand, Ocean and Coastal Management 142, pp. 37–48 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Dolcerocca, B. Coriat, Commons and the public domain, Review of Radical Political Economics 48, 1, pp. 127–139 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. A. Janssen, Governance of common-pool resources, Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics, pp. 38–44 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Ostrom, J. Burger, C. B. Field, R. B. Norgaard, D. Policansky, Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges, Science: American Association for the Advancement of Science 284, 5412, pp. 278–282 (1999) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Ostrom, The challenge of common-pool resources, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 50, 4, pp. 8–21 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Hardin, The tragedy of the commons, science, American Association for the Advancement of Science 162, 3859, pp. 1243–8 (1968) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. D. T. Manning, J. E. Taylor, J. E. Wilen, General equilibrium tragedy of the commons, Environmental and Resource Economics 69, 1, pp. 75–101 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Elkington, Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997) [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. M. Bozec, S. O’Farrell, J. H. Bruggemann, B. E. Luckhurst, P. J. Mumby, Tradeoffs between fisheries harvest and the resilience of coral reefs, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 16, pp. 4536–4541 (2016) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Hannesson, Sustainability of fisheries, Electronic J. Sustainable Development 1, 2, pp. 13 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Pauly, V. Christensen, S. Guénette, T. J. Pitcher, U. R. Sumaila, C. J. Walters, R. Watson, Towards sustainability in world fisheries, Nature 418, 6898, pp. 689–695 (2002) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. B. D. Ratner, E. J. V. Oh, R. S. Pomeroy, Navigating change: second-generation challenges of small-scale fisheries co-management in the Philippines and Vietnam, J. Environmental Management 107, pp. 131–139 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Dietz, E. Ostrom, P. C. Stern, The struggle to govern the commons, Science (New York, N.Y.), American Association for the Advancement of Science 302, 5652, pp. 1907–12 (2003) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. P. R. Ehrlich, P. M. Kareiva, G. C. Daily, Securing natural capital and expanding equity to rescale civilization, Nature 486, 7401, pp. 68–73 (2012) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. B. S. Halpern, C. J. Klein, C. J. Brown, M. Beger, H. S. Grantham, S. Mangubhai, M. Ruckelshaus, Achieving the triple bottom line in the face of inherent trade-offs among social equity, economic return, and conservation, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Sciences 110, 15 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Abbott, J. L. Anderson, L. Campling, R. Hannesson, E. Havice, M. S. Lozier, M. D. Smith, Steering the global partnership for oceans, Marine Resource Economics 29, 1, pp. 1–16 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. O. Hoegh-Guldberg, T. Aqorau, R. Arnason, T. Chansiri, N. Del Rio, H. Demone, S. Earle, Indispensable ocean: aligning ocean health and human well-being - guidance from the blue ribbon panel to the global partnerships for oceans (2013) [Google Scholar]
  20. J. L. Anderson, C. M. Anderson, J. Chu, J. Meredith, F. Asche, G. Sylvia, M. D. Smith, The fishery performance indicators: a management tool for triple bottom line outcomes, edited by Tserpes, G. PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science 10, 5, pp. e0122809 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. USDHHS, Principles of community engagement: clinical and translational science awards consortium community engagement key function committee task force on the principles of community engagement, 2nd Ed. (NIH Publication, Washington, DC, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  22. S. R. Arnstein, A ladder of citizen participation, J. American Institute of Planners 35, 4, pp. 216–224 (1969) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. W. J. Doherty, J. M. Beaton, Family therapists, community, and civic renewal, Family Process 39, 2, pp. 149–161 (2000) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. A. A. N. Jami, P. R. Walsh, The role of public participation in identifying stakeholder synergies in wind power project development: the case study of Ontario, Canada, Renewable Energy 68, pp. 194–202 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. M. S. Reed, S. Vella, E. Challies, J. de Vente, L. Frewer, D. Hohenwallner-Ries, T. Huber, A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?, Restoration Ecology 26, pp. S7–S17 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Goulding, Engaging with community engagement: public libraries and citizen involvement, New Library World 110, 1/2, pp. 37–51 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Aminoff, K. Valkokari, O. Kettunen, Mapping multidimensional value(s) for co-creation networks in a circular economy, in H. Afsarmanesh, L. Camarinha-Matos, L.S.A. (Ed.), Collaboration in a Hyperconnected World. PRO-VE 2016. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Springer, Cham, pp. 629–638, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  28. K. Brown, R. Keast, Citizen-government engagement: community connection through networked arrangements, Asian J. Public Administration 25, 1, pp. 107–131 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Pisarski, P. Ashworth, J. Gardner, Three theories and a process: engaging community | QUT ePrints, in Conference Proceedings of the British Academy of Management (British Academy of Management, UK, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  30. V. Woodward, Community engagement with the state: a case study of the Plymouth Hoe Citizens Jury, Community Development Journal, Narnia 35, 3, pp. 233–244 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. P. Somerville, N. Haines, Prospects for local co-governance, Local Government Studies 34, 1, pp. 61–79 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Tosun, S. Koos, J. Shore, Co-governing common goods: interaction patterns of private and public actors, Policy and Society 35, 1, pp. 1–12 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia, Produktivitas perikanan Indonesia (2018) [Google Scholar]
  34. R. A. Krueger, Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research, 5th ed. (SAGE Publications, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  35. S. D. Lambert, C. G. Loiselle, Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness, J. Advanced Nursing 62, 2, pp. 228–237 (2008) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. V. Braun, V. Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2, pp. 77–101 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. T. T. P. Ha, H. van Dijk, Fishery livelihoods and (non-)compliance with fishery regulations—a case study in Ca Mau Province, Mekong Delta, Viet Nam, Marine Policy 38, pp. 417–427 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. W. Rickels, J. Dovern, M. Quaas, Beyond fisheries: common-pool resource problems in oceanic resources and services, Global Environmental Change 40, pp. 37–49 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. J. C. Cox, Private goods, public goods, and common pools with homo reciprocans, Southern Economic J. 79, 1, pp. 1–14 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Lefebvre, S. Thoyer, M. Tidball, M. Willinger, Sharing rules for common-pool resources when self-Insurance is available, Environmental Modeling & Assessment 19, 2, pp. 111–125 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. S. Schott, N. Buckley, S. Mestelman, R. Muller, Output sharing among groups exploiting common pool resources, MCEEL Working Paper (2003) [Google Scholar]
  42. E. Ostrom, Common-pool resources and institutions: toward a revised theory, Handbook of Agricultural Economics 2, pp. 1315–1339 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. J. Lan, Y. Ma, D. Zhu, D. Mangalagiu, T. F. Thornton, Enabling value co-creation in the sharing economy: the case of mobike, Sustainability (Switzerland, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  44. K. Storbacka, R. J. Brodie, T. Böhmann, P. P. Maglio, S. Nenonen, Actor engagement as a micro foundation for value co-creation, J. Business Research 69, 8, pp. 3008–3017 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. S. Santone, Beyond neoliberalism: education for sustainable development and a new paradigm of global cooperation, building for a sustainable future in our schools, pp. 61–84 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  46. I. Brown, J. Martin-Ortega, K. Waylen, K. Blackstock, Participatory scenario planning for developing innovation in community adaptation responses: three contrasting examples from Latin America, Regional Environmental Change 16, 6, pp. 1685–1700 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. M. Schlarb, J. Musnikow, Community engagement in eco-industrial development, pp. 100–111 (USA, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  48. S. Mosier, M. Ruxton, Sustainability university– community partnerships: lessons for practitioners and scholars from highly sustainable communities, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36, 3, pp. 479–495 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. C. Scandelius, G. Cohen, Achieving collaboration with diverse stakeholders—the role of strategic ambiguity in CSR communication, J. Business Research 69, 9, pp. 3487–3499 (Elsevier, 2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. J. R. Gil-Garcia, T. A. Pardo, T. A. Nam, Comprehensive view of the 21st century city: smartness as technologies and innovation in urban contexts, smarter as the new urban agenda, pp. 1–19 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  51. G. Seyfang, A. Haxeltine, Growing grassroots innovations: exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30, 3, pp. 381–400 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. L. M. Booth, R. W. Duck, A decade of delivering sustainable coastal zone management: the tay estuary forum”, littoral 2010 – adapting to global change at the coast: leadership, innovation, and investment, EDP Sciences, pp. 04006 (Les Ulis, France, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  53. J. Dyer, L. C. Stringer, A. J. Dougill, J. Leventon, M. Nshimbi, F. Chama, A. Kafwifwi, Assessing participatory practices in community-based natural resource management: experiences in community engagement from Southern Africa, J. Environmental Management 137, pp. 137–145 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. C. Baldwin, L. Chandler, At the water’s edge: community voices on climate change, Local Environment 15, 7, pp. 637–649 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.