Open Access
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 388, 2023
The 4th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2022)
Article Number 04018
Number of page(s) 5
Section Technological Influence on Society and Applied Social Sciences to Support Sustainable Society
Published online 17 May 2023
  1. M. Gänßbauer, “Digital Humanities in the German-Speaking World,” Digital Humanities and New Ways of Teaching, vol. 1, pp. 3–16, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Mohd Faizal, S. Rosidayu, and R. NorAdzrah, “Can Twitter be an Effective Platform for Political Discourse in Malaysia? A Study of #PRU13,” in The International Conference on Communication and Media, Langkawi, Malaysia, Oct. 18-20, 2014,pp. 348–355. [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Benson, The Discourse of YouTube Multimodal Text in a Global Context, 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. E. V. Duyn, C. Peacock, and N. J. Stroud, “The Gender Gap in Online News Comment Sections,” Social Science Computer Review, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 181–196, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. N. E. Koç, “Digital Culture and Language,” International Journal of Arts, Humanities & Social Science, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 31–36, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Lankshear and M. Knobel, New literacies, everyday practices and social learning, 3rd Edition, Open University Press, Maidenhead, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  7. R. H. Jones and C. A. Hafner, Understanding Digital Literacies: A Practical Introduction, 1st ed. London, UK: Routledge, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. P. Gee and E. R. Hayes, Language and Learning in the Digital Age, 1st ed. London, UK: Routledge, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Tagg, Exploring Digital Communication: Language in Action, 1st ed. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Darvin and B. Norton, “Social Class, Identity,and Migrant Students,” Journal of Language, Identity & Education, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 111–117, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Alba-Juez, Perspectives on Discourse Analysis: Theory and Practice. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Crystal, “English as a Global Language,” 1st Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  13. R. De Beaugrande and W. Dressler, “Introduction to Text Linguistics,” 1st Edition, Longman, London, 1981. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. A. K. Halliday, “Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning,” Edward Arnold, London, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Schiffrin, “Approaches to Discourse,” Oxford, Blackwell, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Holmes, “An Introduction to Sociolinguistics,” 4th Edition, Routledge, New York, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. N. Lazebna and A. Prykhodko, “Digital discourse of English language acquisition,” Journal of Language and Linguistics Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 971–982, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Gerring, “Qualitative Methods,” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 15–36, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.