Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 388, 2023
The 4th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2022)
Article Number 04022
Number of page(s) 6
Section Technological Influence on Society and Applied Social Sciences to Support Sustainable Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338804022
Published online 17 May 2023
  1. J. Cook, “Ten years on since Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth made its mark,” The Conversation, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://theconversation.com/ten-years-on-how-algores-an-inconvenient-truth-made-its-mark-59387. [Accessed: May 3, 2022]. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Cianchi, Radical Environmentalism: Nature, Agency, And More-Than-Human-Agency. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. H. R. Trujillo, “The radical environmentalist movement,” Aptitude for destruction, vol. 2, pp. 141–178, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Liddick, Eco-terrorism: Radical Environmental And Animal Liberation Movement. Westport: Praeger, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Vanderheiden, “Eco-terrorism or Justified Resistance? Radical Environmentalism and the “War on Terror”,” Politics & Society, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 425–447, 2005, doi: 10.1177/0032329205278462. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Kinnvall and J. Mitzen, “An introduction to the special issue: Ontological securities in world politics,” Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0010836716653161. [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Bordwell and K. Thompson, Film Art, 8th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Bordwell, “The part-time cognitivist: A view from film studies,” Projections, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–18, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Baracco, Hermeneutics of the Film World: A Ricoeurian Method for Film Interpretation. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. I. Takahata, Pom Poko, Japan: Studio Ghibli, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  11. U. Heise, “Plasmatic Nature: Environmentalism and Animated Film,” Public Culture, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 301–318, 2014, doi: 10.1215/08992363-2392075. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Webster, “Angry Critters Spearhead an Ecological Battle,” The New York Times, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/06/movies/pom-poko-directed-by-isao-takahata.html. [Accessed:May 3, 2022]. [Google Scholar]
  13. T. A. Borlik, “Carnivalesque Ecoterrorism in Pom Poko,” Resilience: A Journal of the Environmental Humanities, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 127–133, 2015, doi: 10.5250/resilience.2.3.0127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Schrader, First Reformed, USA: A24, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Cheshire, “First Reformed movie review & film summary (2018) | Roger Ebert,” Roger Ebert, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/firstreformed-2018. [Accessed: May 3, 2022] [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Jelangdeka and B. Kristianto, “Nature through God’s Eyes: Eco-theological Perspectives in Paul Schrader’s First Reformed,” Journal of Language and Literature, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 212–227, 2021. DOI: 10.24071/jolly.v21i2.2935 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Adams, “Pom Poko is Studio Ghibli’s Bleakest Take on the Environment,” CBR, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.cbr.com/pom-poko-studioghibli-bleak-environment/. [Accessed: May 3, 2022]. [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Manson, “First Reformed – A Pastor’s Dark Night of the Soul,” ScreenFish, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://screenfish.net/first-reformed-apastors-dark-night-of-the-soul/. [Accessed: May 3, 2022]. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.