Open Access
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 388, 2023
The 4th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2022)
Article Number 04047
Number of page(s) 5
Section Technological Influence on Society and Applied Social Sciences to Support Sustainable Society
Published online 17 May 2023
  1. R. Fachriansyah., COVID-19 crisis opportunity for education reform in Indonesia, August 13, The Jakarta Post. (2020). [Google Scholar]
  2. T. W. Frick., Education systems and technology in 1990, 2020, and beyond. TechTrends,64, pp. 693–703, (2020). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Amer., Language learners’ usage of a mobile learning application for learning idioms and collocations, CALICO Journal,31, no.3, pp. 285–302, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. C. V. Katemba., Teachers’ perceptions in implementing technologies in language teaching and learning. Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature and Culture, 5, no. 2, pp. 123–136, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  5. E. H. Baz., Attitudes of Turkish EFL student teachers towards technology use. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,15, no. 2, pp. 1–10, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  6. N. Cowie. And K. Sakui., Assessment and elearning: Current issues and future trends. jaltcalljournal, 11, no. 3, pp. 271–281, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Sahin-Topalcengiz. and B. Yildirim., Teachers’ opinions about distance Web 2.0 tools training and teachers’ in-class Web 2.0 practices. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17, no. 4, pp. 561–577, (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Faizi., Moroccan higher education students’ and teachers’ perceptions towards using Web 2.0 technologies in language learning and teaching. Knowledge Management & E-Learning,10, no. 1, pp. 86–96, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  9. U. Süĝümlü, S. Aslan., The use of Web 2.0 tools in mother-tongue instruction: Teachers’ experiences. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies,10, no. 1, pp. 124–137,(2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. A. Jarrah and A. A. Alzubi., Arab postgraduates’ readiness towards and effectiveness of utilizing Web 2.0 in language learning. International Journal of Instruction, 14, no. 1, pp. 673–690, (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Burrows., G. Swarts., L. Hutchison., J. Katzmann., R. Thompson., L. Freeman., . . . T. Reynolds., Finding spaces: Teacher Education Technology Competencies (TETCs). Education Sciences,11, (2021). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. K. K. Sutton. and J. DeSantis., Beyond change blindness: Embracing the technology revolution in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  13. H. A. Efe and Y. E. Baysal., Determining science teachers’ level of motivation and self-regulation regarding use of education technologies. European Journal of Education Studies,3, no. 6, pp. 329–354,(2017). [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Mims., D. Polly., C. Shepherd. and F. Inan., Examining PT3 projects designed to improve preservice education. Tech Trends,50, no. 3, pp. 16–24.(2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Hubbard., Five keys from the past to the future of CALL. International Journal of Computer- Assisted Language Learning and Teaching,9, no. 3, pp. 1–13. (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.