Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 389, 2023
Ural Environmental Science Forum “Sustainable Development of Industrial Region” (UESF-2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01044 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Materials Science Innovations, Green Chemistry and Emission Reduction | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338901044 | |
| Published online | 31 May 2023 | |
- Campos, D. C. (2014). Microcapsule-by drying the nitrogen with a sprayer correction of associated bacterial lupine nodules World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 30(9) pp.2371-2378. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deslandes, L., & Rivas, S. (2012). Catch me if you can: bacterial effectors and plant targets Trends in Plant Science 17 pp. 644-655. [Google Scholar]
- Glick, B. R. (1995). The enhancement of plant growth by free living bacteria Canadian Journal of Microbiology 41 pp.109-117. [Google Scholar]
- Halder, M., Sarkar, S., & Jha, S. (2019). Elicitation: a biotechnological tool for enhanced production of secondary metabolites in hairy root cultures Engineering in Life Sciences, 19(12), pp. 880-895. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hongda, C., Jochen, W., & Fereidoon, Sh. (2006). Emerging technology has shown great potential for delivering bioactive compounds in functional foods to improve human health Nanotechnology in Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods 3(6) pp. 30-36. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, J. D., & Dangl, J. L. (2006). The plant immune system. Nature, 444, 323-329. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Radha, T. K., & Rao, D. (2014). Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria from Cow Dung Based Biodynamic Preparations Indian Journal of Microbiology 54(4) pp. 413-418. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sher, M. Sh., Muhammad, S. A., Muhammad, A., Muhammad, A., Muhammad, U. G., Muhammad, R., Tahira, Y., & Muhammad, A. Z. (2015). Alleviation of abiotic stress in medicinal plants by PGPR. In Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Medicinal Plants: Part II. Alleviation Plant Stress pp. 135-166. [Google Scholar]
- Sobirova, M. B. (n.d.). Determination of stimulant properties of local rhizobacteria-based bioproducts against Cynara scolymus L. The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering, 4(02) pp. 26-30. [Google Scholar]
- Sobirova, M., & Murodova, S. (2021). Effects of biopraparites on cynara scolymus L., micro and macroelements, and quantity of flavonoids In E3S Web of Conferences 258, pp. 04025. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Sundaravardarajan, K., Jahanmohan, K., & Swaminathan, L. P. (2006). Constraints in adoption of bio-input usage in cotton cultivation Agricultural Economics Research Review 19 pp. 55-164. [Google Scholar]
- Voynova, O. N. (2009). Microbial polymers and their properties of degradable pesticide delivery base Practical biochemistry and microbiology 45(4) pp. 427-431. [Google Scholar]
- Davranov, Q., Murodova, S. S., & Samadiy, S. A. (2017). Rhizobacteria of biopolymers gel immobilization UzMU Messages Journal 3(1) pp. 42-47. [Google Scholar]
- Loginov, O. N., Vasileva, N. S., & Silishchev, N. N. (2007). Obtaining a dry preparative form of a biological product for agricultural purposes “Elena” Bashkir Chemical Journal, 12(2) pp. 45-47. [Google Scholar]
- Khojamshukurov, N. A., & Maksumova, D. Q. (2014). Biotechnological process equipment Tashkent: Publishing House pp.35-41. [Google Scholar]
- Nadarinskaya, M. A., Kvetkovskaya, A. V., Golushko, O. G. (2011). Influence of tripoli and morphofunctional blood traits in highly productive cows during the milking period 14(1) pp. 140-145. [Google Scholar]
- Petrov, V. B., Chebotar, V. K., & Kazakov, A. E. (2002). Microbiological preparations in the biologization of agriculture in Russia Achievements of Science and Technology AIC 10 pp. 16-20. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.