Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 389, 2023
Ural Environmental Science Forum “Sustainable Development of Industrial Region” (UESF-2023)
Article Number 04023
Number of page(s) 8
Section Land Management, Soil and Cadastres
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338904023
Published online 31 May 2023
  1. Atkins D.E., Kelvin K. Droegemeier, Stuart I. Feldman, Hector Garcia-Molina, Michael L. Klein, David G. Messerschmitt, Paul Messina, Jeremiah P. Ostriker, Margaret H. Wright, Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyber-infrastructure: Report of the national science foundation Blue-Ribbon advisory panel on cyberinfrastructure, National science foundation publication NSF0728 (National science foundation, Washington, DC), 2003. [Google Scholar]
  2. Crawford D., Leland Jameson, Margaret, Leinen, José Muñoz, Stephen Meacham, Michael Plesniak, Cyberinfrastructure vision for 21st century discovery, National science foundation publication CISE051203 (National science foundation, Washington, DC), 2007. [Google Scholar]
  3. Renear A.H., Palmer C.L., Strategic reading, ontologies, and the future of scientific publishing, 2009, Science 325:828–832, DOI: 10.1126/science.1157784. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buetow K.H., Cyberinfrastructure: empowering a “third way” in biomedical research, 2005, Science 308:821–824, DOI: 10.1126/science.1112120. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hey T., Tansley S., Tolle K., The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery (Microsoft research, Redmond, WA), 2009. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kartsan I.N., Efremova S.V., Khrapunova V.V., Tolstopiatov M.I. Choice of optimal multiversion software for a small satellite ground-based control and command complex. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018. V. 450(2). 022015. DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/450/2/022015. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kartsan I.N., Efremova S.V. Distributed control of university small spacecraft. Actual problems of aviation and cosmonautics. Proceedings of the V International Scientific-Practical Conference dedicated to the Day of Cosmonautics. Krasnoyarsk. 2019. P. 47 - 48. (in Russian). [Google Scholar]
  8. Benioff M.R., Edward D. Lazowska, Computational science: ensuring america’s competitiveness, report to the President by the President’s information technology advisory committee (National coordination office for information technology research and development, Arlington, VA), 2005. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang S., Zhu X-G., Coupling cyberinfrastructure and geographic information systems to empower ecological and environmental research, 2008, Bioscience 58: 94–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hey T., Trefethen A.E., Cyberinfrastructure for e-Science, 2005, Science 308:817–821, DOI: 10.1126/science.1110410. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Foster I., Service-oriented science, 2005, Science 308: 814–817, DOI: 10.1126/science.1110411. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bohannon J., Distributed computing. Grassroots supercomputing, 2005, Science 308:810–813, DOI: 10.1126/science.308.5723.810. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Clery D., Voss D,. All for one and one for all, 2005, Science 308:809, DOI: 10.1126. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lazowska E.D., Patterson D.A., An endless frontier postponed, 2005, Science 308:757, DOI:10.1126/science.1113963. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Craglia M., Michael Goodchild, et.al., Ed Parsons., Next-generation digital earth: A position paper from the Vespucci Initiative for the advancement of geographic information science. Int J Spatial Data Infrastructures Res 3:146–167, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  16. Blais J.A.R., Esche H., Geomatics and the new cyberinfrastructure. Geomatica 62:11–22, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang S., Liu Y., TeraGrid GIScience gateway: bridging cyberinfrastructure and GIScience. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 23:631–656, 2009, DOI:10.1080/13658810902754977. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang T., Tsou M-H., Developing a grid-enabled spatial web portal for internet GIServices and geospatial cyberinfrastructure. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 23: 605–630, 2009, DOI:10.1080/13658810802698571. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Maguire D.J., Goodchild M.F., Rhind D.W., eds., Geographical information systems: principles and applications (Wiley, New York), 1991. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gewin V., Mapping opportunities. Nature 427: 376–377, 2004. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Taaffe E.J., The spatial view in context. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 64:1–16, 1974, DOI:10.1111/J.1467-8306.1974.TB00950.X. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tyapkin V.N., Kartsan I.N., Dmitriev D.D., Efremova S.V. Algorithms for adaptive processing of signals in a flat phased antenna array. International Siberian Conference on Controland Communications (SIBCON). 2017. Proceedings 2017. 7998452. DOI:10.1109/SIBCON.2017.7998452. [Google Scholar]
  23. Miller H.J., Tobler’s First Law and spatial analysis. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 94:284–289, 2004, DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402005.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Onsrud H., ed., Research and theory in advanced spatial data infrastructure concepts (ESRI Press, Redlands, CA), 2007. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kartsan I.N. Ground control system for small spacecraft // Bulletin of Siberian State Aerospace University named after Academician M.F. Reshetnev. 2009. V. 3 (24). P. 89 - 92. (in Russian). [Google Scholar]
  26. Kartsan I.N., Goncharov A.E., Zelenkov P.V., Kovalev I.V., Fateev Y.L., Tyapkin V.N., Dmitriev D.D. Applying filtering for determining the angular orientation of spinning objects during interference. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2016. 012020. DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/155/1/012020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Egenhofer M., Toward the geospatial semantic web. Advances in geographic information systems international symposium, eds Makki Y., Pissinou N. (Association for Computing Machinery, McLean, VA), 2002, pp 1–4, DOI:10.1145/585147.585148. [Google Scholar]
  28. Anselin L., Florax R., Rey S., eds., Advances in spatial econometrics: methodology, tools and applications (Springer, Berlin), 2004, DOI:10.1007/978-3-662-05617-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang S., Armstrong M., A theoretical approach to the use of cyberinfrastructure in geographical analysis, Int J Geogr Inf Sci 23:169–193, 2009, DOI:10.1080/13658810801918509. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang S., A cyberGIS framework for the synthesis of cyberinfrastructure, GIS, and spatial analysis, Ann Assoc Am Geogr 100:535–557, 2010, DOI:10.1080/00045601003791243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Penninga F., Van Oosterom P.J.M., A simplicial complex-based DBMS approach to 3D topographic data modelling. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22:751–779, 2008, DOI:10.1080/13658810701673535. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Baker K.S., Chandler C.L., Enabling long-term oceanographic research: changing data practices, information management strategies and informatics. Deep-Sea Res II 55(18–19):2132–2142, 2008, DOI:10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.05.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang C., Raskin R., Goodchild M., Gahegan M., Geospatial cyberinfrastructure: Past, present and future. Comput Environ Urban Syst 34:264–277, 2010, DOI:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.04.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gore A., The digital Earth: understanding our planet in the 21st Century. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 65:528, 1999, DOI:10.1080/00050348.1998.10558728. [Google Scholar]
  35. Averyanov V.S., Kartsan I.N., Efremova S.V. Methods of automated detection of anomalies and nonlinear transitions by autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021. 42001. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1889/4/042001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Pirkhavka A.P., Legkiy N.M., Kartsan I.N., Zhukov A.O. Analysis of the operational readiness of telecommunication networks. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021. 32053. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2094/3/032053 [Google Scholar]
  37. Anselin L., What is special about spatial data? Alternative perspectives on spatial data analysis, technical report 89-4 (National center for geographic information and analysis, Santa Barbara, CA), 1989. [Google Scholar]
  38. Anselin L., Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geogr Anal 27:93–115, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kartsan I.N., Shumakova N.A., Zhukov A.O., Platonov O.A., Efremova S.V. Safety system for space vehicles using integrated devices located outside of the satellite platform. JOP Conference Series: Metrological Support of Innovative Technologies. 2020. 42022. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1515/4/042022 [Google Scholar]
  40. Turton I., Openshaw S., High-performance computing and geography: developments, issues, and case studies. Environ Plan A 30:1839–1856, 1998, DOI:10.1068/a301839. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Krzanowski R., Raper J., Spatial evolutionary modelling (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Batty M., Cities and complexity: understanding cities through cellular automata, agent-Based models, and fractals (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 2005. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jankowski P., Nyerges T., GIS-supported collaborative decision making: Results of an experiment. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 91:48–70, 2001, DOI:10.1111/0004-5608.00233. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhukov A.O., et.al., Adaptation of receiving channels to the spectrum of the received signal. JOP Conference Series: Metrological Support of Innovative Technologies. 2020. 032070. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1515/3/032070 [Google Scholar]
  45. Goodchild M.F., Janelle D.G., eds., Spatially integrated social science (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 2004. [Google Scholar]
  46. Miller H.J., Wentz E.A., Representation and spatial analysis in geographic information systems. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 93:574–594, 2003, DOI:10.1111/1467-8306.9303004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wright D.J., Spatial data infrastructures for coastal environments. Remote sensing and geospatial technologies for coastal ecosystem assessment and management. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography, ed Yang X. (Springer, Berlin), pp 91–112, 2009, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88183-4_5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tesfatsion L., Agent-based computational economics: Growing economies from the bottom up. Artif Life 8:55–82, 2002, DOI:10.1162/106454602753694765. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Helly J.J., Kaufman R.S., Vernet M., Stephenson G.R., Spatial characterization of the meltwater field from icebergs in the Weddell Sea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:5492–5497, 2011, DOI:10.1073/pnas.0909306108. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Dembickij N.L., et.al., Distributed control network for complex radio engineering systems on continuum computers. JOP Conference Series: Metrological Support of Innovative Technologies. 2020. 42076. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1515/4/042076 [Google Scholar]
  51. Yang C., Wu H., Huang Q., Li Z., Li J., Using spatial principles to optimize distributed computing for enabling the physical science discoveries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:5498–5503, 2011, DOI:10.1073/pnas.090931510. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Efremova S.V., Kartsan I.N., Zhukov A.O. An ordered ranking multi-attributive model for decision-making systems with attributes of control systems software. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2021. 12068. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1047/1/012068 [Google Scholar]
  53. Kulikov A., Timoshenko A., Zhukov A., Kartsan I. Control system for multi-agent groups of heterogeneous sensors. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2021. V. 3091. P. 87. DOI: 10.47813/dnit-mip5/2022-3091-87-92 [Google Scholar]
  54. Semenenko M.G., Kniazeva I.V., Beckel L.S., Rutskiy V.N., Tsarev R.Yu., Yamskikh T.N., Kartsan I.N. How to use neural network and web technologies in modeling complex technical systems. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. 32095. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/537/3/032095 [Google Scholar]
  55. Kudymov V.I., et.al., Formation of optimal composition of the modules of single-function multiversion software for automated control system of the satellite communication system. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018. 052009. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/450/5/052009 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sieber R.E., Wellen C.C., Jin Y., Spatial cyberinfrastructures, ontologies, and the humanities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:5504–5509, 2011, DOI:10.1073/pnas.0911052108. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Poore B.S., Users as essential contributors to spatial cyberinfrastructures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:5510–5515, 2011, DOI:10.1073/pnas.0907677108. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Fox A., Computer science. Cloud computing—what’s in it for me as a scientist? Science 331:406–407, 2011, DOI:10.1126/science.1198981. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Gao X., Ma Y., Pierce M., Lowe M., Fox G., Building a distributed block storage system for cloud infrastructure. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE international conference on cloud computing technology and science (CloudCom), eds Fox G., Zhao G., Qui J., Hughes A. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Indianapolis, IN), 2010, pp 1–9, DOI:10.1109/CloudCom.2010.72. [Google Scholar]
  60. Preparata F.P., Shamos M.I., Computational geometry: an introduction (Springer, Berlin), 1990. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.