Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 389, 2023
Ural Environmental Science Forum “Sustainable Development of Industrial Region” (UESF-2023)
Article Number 08024
Number of page(s) 9
Section Psychology of Environmentally Responsible Behavior
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338908024
Published online 31 May 2023
  1. PDF 2.0 “ISO 32000–2:2020(en), Document management – Portable document format – Part 2: PDF 2.0”. Last accessed at 10 February 2023. Available on www.iso.org [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Moore, “Ongoing efforts to generate tagged PDF” using pdfTEX. Towards a Digital Mathematics Library. Grand Bend, Ontario, Canada, July 8-9th, pp. 125–131 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  3. PDF Association “PDF’s popularity online Duff Johnson, September 10, 2021”. Last accessed at 10 February 2023. Available on https://www.pdfa.org/pdfs-popularity-online [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Endignoux, O. Levillain, J.Y. Migeon, Caradoc: A pragmatic approach to pdf parsing and validation. In IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), pp. 126–139 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Parinov, Int. J. of Metadata, Semant. and Ontologies 12(4), 195–203 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmso.2017.093626 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. PYPDF: “Documentation library PYPDF”. Last accessed at 10 February 2023. Available on https://pypdf2.readthedocs.io/en/stable/index.htm [Google Scholar]
  7. PDFminer: “PDFMiner is a text extraction tool for PDF documents”. Last accessed at 10 February 2023. Available on https://github.com/euske/pdfminer [Google Scholar]
  8. Slate: “slate: the easiest way to get text from PDFs in Python”. Last accessed at 10 February 2023. Available on https://github.com/timClicks/slate [Google Scholar]
  9. Apache PDFBox®: “A Java PDF Library”. Last accessed at 10 February 2023. Available on https://pdfbox.apache.org/ [Google Scholar]
  10. Itextpdf: “The preferred PDF technology, by developers for developers.”. Last accessed at 10 February 2023. Available on https://itextpdf.com/ [Google Scholar]
  11. Poppler: “Poppler is a PDF rendering library based on the xpdf-3.0 code base.”. Last accessed at 10 February 2023. https://poppler.freedesktop.org/ [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Xu, Z. Tang, X. Tao, Y. Li, C. Shi, Graph-based layout analysis for pdf documents. In Imaging and printing in a web 2.0 world iv 8664:34-41. SPIE (2013) [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Gao, Z. Tang, X. Lin, Y. Liu, R. Qiu, Y. Wang, Structure extraction from PDF-based book documents. In Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM/IEEE joint conference on Digital libraries, pp. 11–20 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Hao, L. Gao, X. Yi, Z. Tang, A table detection method for pdf documents based on convolutional neural networks. In 2016 12th IAPR Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS), pp. 287–292 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Shao, R.P. Futrelle, Recognition and classification of figures in PDF documents. In Graphics Recognition. Ten Years Review and Future Perspectives: 6th Internation Workshop, GREC 2005, Hong Kong, China, August 25–26, 2005, Revised Selected 6, pp. 231–242. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2006) [Google Scholar]
  16. S.Y. Kahu, Figure extraction from scanned electronic theses and dissertations. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech (2020) [Google Scholar]
  17. U. Schäfer, B. Kiefer, Advances in deep parsing of scholarly paper content. In Advanced Language Technologies for Digital Libraries: International Workshops on NLP4DL 2009, Viareggio, Italy, June 15, 2009 and AT4DL 2009, Trento, Italy, September 8, 2009, pp. 135–153. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2011) [Google Scholar]
  18. W.F. Hsiao, T.M. Chang, E. Thomas, Program 48(3), 293–313 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. X. Wang, J.C. Liu, A font setting based Bayesian model to extract mathematical expression in PDF files. In 2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR) 1:759–764 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  20. X. Zhang, L. Gao, K. Yuan, R. Liu, Z. Jiang, Z. Tang, A symbol dominance based formulae recognition approach for pdf documents. In 2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR) 1:1144–1149 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Ramakrishnan, A. Patnia, E. Hovy, G.A. Burns, Source code for biology and medicine 7, 1-10 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. V.I. Martsinkevich, G.S. Larionova, V.V. Tereshchenko, et. al., Economics. Law. Innovations 3, 39-49 (2022). https://doi.org/10.17586/2713-1874-2022-3-47-57 [Google Scholar]
  23. E. Kobets, A. Tretiakov, N. Gorlushkina, Adv. in Soc. Sci., Education and Humanities Res. 646, 188-192 (2022). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220208.033 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.