Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 389, 2023
Ural Environmental Science Forum “Sustainable Development of Industrial Region” (UESF-2023)
Article Number 09031
Number of page(s) 17
Section Environmental Policy and Economics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338909031
Published online 31 May 2023
  1. R. Abdullahi, N. Mansor, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences 5(4), 38–45 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Bulut, O. Culha, International Journal of Training and Development 14(4), 309–322 (2010) DOI :10.1111/j.1468-2419.2010.00360.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Beebeejaun, L. Dulloo, Journal of Money Laundering Control (2022) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-12-2021-0141 [Google Scholar]
  4. A.J. Bingham, P. Witkowsky, Deductive and inductive approaches to qualitative data analysis. Analyzing and interpreting qualitative data: After the interview. Sage Publications (2022) DOI: https://www.andreajbingham.com/resources-tips-andtricks/deductive-and-inductive-approaches-to-qualitative-analysis [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Braun, M. Kasper, A. Majdanska, M. Somare, Journal of Tax Administration 2, 1 (2016) DOI: https://epub.wu.ac.at/5066/1/72-256-1-PB.pdf [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Bryans, Bitcoin and Money Laundering: Mining for an Effective Solution (2014) DOI: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/indana89&div=16&id=&page [Google Scholar]
  7. L.S. Borlini, F. Montanaro, The Evolution of the EU Law Against Criminal Finance: The “Hardening” of FATF Standards within the EU (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3010099). Social Science Research Network (2017) DOI: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3010099 [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Canestri, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 23(3), 214–240 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Cao, M. Hamori, Human Resource Management 55(3), 499–517 (2016) DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21731 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J.W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.) (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage., 2014) [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Ehrhardt, J.S. Miller, S.J. Freeman, P.W. Hom, Human Resource Development Quarterly 22(4), 459–489 (2011) DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.20086 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Erkko, Planning and designing an effective AML-training program for financial institutions and auditing its efficiency (ACAMS AML White Papers) (DC, Washington, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Hamran, E. Szabova, New Journal of European Criminal Law 4(1), 40–58 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. R.J. Johari, N.B. Zul, N. Talib, S.A.H.S. Hussin, Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research 123 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  15. N.M. Ishak, A.Y. Abu Bakar, World Journal of Education 4(3), 1925-0746 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Kay, (2015). The current trends and challenges of hiring, developing and retaining talent in AML audit and compliance (ACAMS AML White Papers). Washington, DC: ACAMS. https://www.acams.org/aml-white-paper-aml-audit-hiring/ [Google Scholar]
  17. S.B. Merriam, E.J. Tisdell, (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Sage Publications. Volume 67, Issue 1. [Google Scholar]
  18. N. Mugarura, (2014). Customer due diligence (CDD) mandate and the propensity of its application as a global AML paradigm. Journal of Money Laundering Control. Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-07-2013-0024 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. F.M.J. Teichmann, (2017), Twelve methods of money laundering. Journal of Money Laundering Control. Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-05-2016-0018 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Unger, (2020) Improving Anti-Money Laundering Policy, Study for the committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, European Parliament, Luxembourg. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/648789/IPOL_STU(2020)648789_EN.pdf [Google Scholar]
  21. B. Unger, M. Siegel, J. Ferwerda, et al., (2006). THE AMOUNTS AND THE EFFECTS OF MONEY LAUNDERING. Utrecht School of Economics. https://www.ftm.nl/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/witwassen-in-nederland-onderzoeknaar-criminele-geldstromen.pdf [Google Scholar]
  22. B. Unger, (2013). Money laundering regulation: from Al Capone to Al Qaeda, Chapters, in: Brigitte Unger & Daan van der Linde (ed.), Research Handbook on Money Laundering, chapter 2, pp. 19–32, Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  23. B. Unger, J. Ferwerda, M. van den Broek, I. Deleanu, (2014). The Economic and Legal Effectiveness of the European Union’s Anti-Money Laundering Policy, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15683. [Google Scholar]
  24. B. Unger, G. Rawlings, (2008). Competing for criminal money. Global Business and Economics Review, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Wronka, (2021). ““Cyber-laundering”: the change of money laundering in the digital age”, Journal of Money Laundering Control, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-ofprint. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-04-2021-0035 [Google Scholar]
  26. S.S. Yeh, (2022). New Financial Action Task Force Recommendations to Fight Corruption and Money Laundering. MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/11/1/8/htm [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.