EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 391 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 391 (2023) 01032 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 391, 2023
4th International Conference on Design and Manufacturing Aspects for Sustainable Energy (ICMED-ICMPC 2023)
Article Number 01032
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339101032
Published online 05 June 2023
  1. P. L. Coronado, F. Stetina, and D. Jacob, “New technologies to support NASA’s Mission to Planet Earth satellite remote sensing product validation: use of an unmanned autopiloted vehicle (UAV) as a platform to conduct remote sensing,” Robotic and Semi-Robotic Ground Vehicle Technology, vol. 3366, pp. 38–49, (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. S. R. Herwitz, L. F. Johnson, J. C. Arvesen, R. G. Higgins, J. G. Leung, and S. E. Dunagan, “Precision agriculture as a commercial application for solar powered unmanned aerial vehicles,” in AIAA’s 1st Technical Conference and workshop on Unmanned Aerospace Vehicles, p. 7, Portsmouth, Virginia, (2002). [Google Scholar]
  3. L. F. Johnson, S. Herwitz, S. Dunagan, B. Lobitz, D. Sullivan, and R. Slye, “Collection of ultra-high spatial and spectral resolution image data over California vineyards with a small UAV,” Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment (ISRSE), pp. 3–5, (2003), http://www.uav-applications.org/gallery/img/5.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Eisenbeiss, “A mini unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV): system overview and image acquisition,” International Archives of Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 36, no. 5/W1, p. 7, (2004). [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Nebiker, A. Annen, M. Scherrer, and D. Oesch, “A lightweight multispectral sensor for micro-UAV-opportunities for very high resolution airborne remote sensing,” The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, vol. 37, pp. 1193–1199, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Romeo, G. Frulla, E. Cestino, and G. Corsino, “HELIPLAT: design, aerodynamic, structural analysis of long-endurance solar-powered stratospheric platform,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1505–1520, (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Jashnani, T. R. Nada, M. Ishfaq, A. Khamker, and P. Shaholia, “Sizing and preliminary hardware testing of solar powered UAV,” The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 189–198, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. T. E. Noll, J. M. Brown, M. E. Perez-Davis, S. D. Ishmael, G. C. Tiffany, and M. Gaier, Investigation of the Helios Prototype Aircraft Mishap, (2004), https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/64317main_helios.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  9. X. Zhu, Z. Guo, and Z. Hou, “Solar-powered airplanes: a historical perspective and future challenges,” Progress in Aerospace Science, vol. 71, pp. 36–53, (2014). International Journal of Aerospace Engineering 11. [Google Scholar]
  10. J. B. McDevitt and A. F. Okuno, Static and Dynamic Pressure Measurements on a Naca 0012 Air foil in the Ames High Reynolds Number Facility, (1985). [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Llorente, A. Gorostidi, M. Jacobs, W. A. Timmer, X. Munduate, and O. Pires, “Wind tunnel tests of wind turbine airfoils at high Reynolds numbers,” Journal of Physics Conference Series, vol. 524, no. 1, p. 10, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Giguére and M. S. Selig, “New airfoils for small horizontal axis wind turbines,” The Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 108–114, (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. R. K. Singh, M. R. Ahmed, M. A. Zullah, and Y. H. Lee, “Design of a low Reynolds number airfoil for small horizontal axis wind turbines,” Renewable energy, vol. 42, pp. 66–76, (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Shin and K. Kim, “Aerodynamic performance prediction of SG6043 airfoil for a horizontal-axis small wind turbine,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1452, no. 1, p. 11, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Sharma, “An aerodynamic comparative analysis of airfoils for low-speed aircrafts,” International Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 525–529, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  16. S. A. Oller, L. G. Nallim, and S. Oller, “Usability of the Selig S1223 profile airfoil as a high lift hydrofoil for hydrokinetic application,” Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 537–542, (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R. R. Glassock, Design, Modelling and Measurement of Hybrid Powerplant for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), Queensland University of Technology, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  18. W. A. Mair and D. L. Birdsall, Aircraft Performance, Cambridge University Press, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  19. B. A. Moffitt, T. H. Bradley, D. E. Parekh, D. Mavris, and E. Hartford, “Validation of vortex propeller theory for UAV design with uncertainty analysis,” in 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, pp. 1–19, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  20. M. K. Rwigema, “Propeller blade element momentum theory with vortex wake deflection,” 27th International congress of the aeronautical sciences, vol. 1, pp. 727–735, (2010). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.