EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 393 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 393 (2023) 02018 References
Open Access

This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339302037]

Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 393, 2023
2023 5th International Conference on Environmental Prevention and Pollution Control Technologies (EPPCT 2023)
Article Number 02018
Number of page(s) 6
Section Ecological Protection and Sustainable Development Research
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339302018
Published online 02 June 2023
  1. Yang W., Zhou L., Sun D. Ecological vulnerability assessment of the Yellow River Basin based on partition - integration concept. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 33(03): 211-218(2021). [Google Scholar]
  2. Xiao F., Xu Y., Huang D., et al. Impact of climate change on ecological security of the Yellow River Basin and its adaptation countermeasures[J]. Yellow River, 3(01): 10-14+52(2021). [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang H. Ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin are guaranteed by scientific management methods[J]. Yellow River,42(05):1-7+12(2020). [Google Scholar]
  4. Qiu Z., Mao D.,Xiang H., et al. Patterns and changes of wetlands in the Yellow River Basin for 5 periods[J]. Wetland Science, 19(04): 518-526 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  5. Mou X., Zhang X., Wang X., et al. Ecological change assessment and protection strategy in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 24(01): 113-121 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  6. Ren B., Zou Q. The evaluation of environmental carrying capacity in Yellow River Basin and the policy orientation for further ascension[J]. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition, 51(05): 824-838 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang Y., Chen Y., Wang H., et al. Ecosystem change and its ecohydrological effect in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 35(04): 520-528 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  8. Tan Y., Yang M. On the profound connotation of Xi Jinping's concept of ecological security[J]. Socialism Studies, (05): 89-95 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  9. Wu B., Yu Q., Lin H. Basic concepts and theoretical system of eco-security[J]. Forestry Economics, 38(07): 19-26 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  10. Yan B., Lv S., Zhao M., et al. Advances in the research on assessment methods of grassland ecological security[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 41(05): 164-171 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang K., Lin N., Xu D., et al. Research advance on ecological security in China: assessment models and management measures[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 34(12): 1057-1063 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  12. Xie G. Research on the farmland ecological safety in Guangzhou[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 38(22): 152-154 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  13. Ying L., Kong L., Xiao Y., et al. The research progress and prospect of ecological security and its assessing approaches[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42(05): 1679-1692 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  14. Peng J., Dang W., Liu Y., et al. Review on landscape ecological risk assessment[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(04): 664-677 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  15. Wan H., Wang S., Chen B., et al. Ecological risk assessment and spatial threshold analysis of wetlands in the Sanjiang plain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, (16): 1-12 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang T., Wang T., Huang Q., et al. Ecological risk assessment of Lhasa River Basin on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(24): 9012-9020 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  17. Rao L., Zhou L., Xu C., et al. Connotation, method and practice of the quality assessment on ecoenvironment[J]. Subtropical Soil and Water Conservation, 32(03): 37-41+54 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  18. SU S, LI D, YU X, et al. Assessing land ecological security in Shanghai (China) based on catastrophe theory[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 25(6): 737-746 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tan Y., Yu Z. An ecological security evaluation of Huaihe river based on DSR[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition) , 21(05): 35-39 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu X., Shao Y., Cui S., et al. Ecological security assessment in Dongjiang lake watershed based on PSFR model[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 24(S1): 197-1205 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  21. PIRRONE N, TROMBINO G, CINNIRELLA S, et al. The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach for integrated catchment-coastal zone management: preliminary application to the Po catchment-Adriatic Sea coastal zone system[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 5(2-3): 111-137 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sima W., Hu X., Shen Z., et al. Water ecological safety valuation index system of Daqing river basin[J]. Water & Wastewater Engineering, 57(01):90-95+102 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  23. Ruan J., He G., Wang Y. Dynamic assessment of regional ecological security based on ideal point-unascertained measurement theory[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 21(16):6951-6957 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  24. Pan J., Wang Y. Ecological security evaluation and ecological pattern optimization in Taolai River Basin based on CVOR and circuit theory[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(07): 2582-2595 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  25. Wu D., Liu Y., Liu Y., et al. Progress on ecological security evaluation of cultivated land[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 23(03): 257-267 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  26. Kang H., Li X., Chen X., et al. Evaluation method and its application of river ecological security in Fujian province[J]. Hydraulic Science and Technology, (03): 1-6(2019). [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang G. Ecological security mechanism and assessment method based on potential danger factors-the case study of liaohe river watershed[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  28. Han S., Zhang L., Chen Y. Fallow scale of major grain producing areas in Jiangsu Province under food security and ecological safety constraints[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(23): 247-255 (). [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhu B., Tang J., Jiang M., et al. Simulation and regulation of carbon market risk based on system dynamics[J/OL]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice: 1-21. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.