Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 393, 2023
2023 5th International Conference on Environmental Prevention and Pollution Control Technologies (EPPCT 2023)
Article Number 02021
Number of page(s) 4
Section Ecological Protection and Sustainable Development Research
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339302021
Published online 02 June 2023
  1. Abujabbhah I S, Doyle R B, Bound S A, et al. Assessment of bacterial community composition, methanotrophic and nitrogen-cycling bacteria in three soils with different biochar application rates. Journal of Soils & Sediments, 2018,18: 148-158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aller D M, Archontoulis S V, Zhang W D, et al. Long term biochar effects on corn yield, soil quality and profitability in the US Midwest. Field Crop Research, 2018,227: 30-40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bieser, J M H, Thomas S C. Biochar and high-carbon wood ash effects on soil and vegetation in a boreal clearcut. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2019,49: 1124-1134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang L, Gao C, Yang K, et al. Effects of biochar aging in the soil on its mechanical property and performance for soil CO2 and N2O emissions. Science of the Total Environment. 2021,782:146824. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang L W, O'cnooor D, Rinklebe J, et al. Biochar Aging: mechanisms, physicochemical changes, assessment, and implications for field applications. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020,54(23): 14797-14814. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu X, Zhang A, Ji C, et al. Biochar’s effect on crop productivity and the dependence on experimental conditions-a meta-analysis of literature data. Plant and Soil, 2013,1(373):583-594. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Yan P, Wu L, Wang D, et al. Soil acidification in Chinese tea plantations. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,715:136963. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang Y X, Hang J Q, Y J, et al. Effects of different amounts of biochar application on soil property and bacterial community structure in acidified tea plantation. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020,26(11): 1967-1977. [Google Scholar]
  9. Alvarez E, Viade A, Fernandez Marcos M L. Effect of liming with different sized limestone on the forms of aluminum in a Galician soil (NW Spain). Geoderma, 2009, 152:1-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chi J, Ding Z H, Sun N. A method for separation of biochar from soil and its application. Chinese: CN 110964582A, 2020-04-07. [Google Scholar]
  11. Alvarez A, Monterroso C, Fernandez Marcos M L. Aluminum fractionation in Galician (NW Spain) forest soils as related to vegetation and parent material. Forest Ecology and Management. 2002, 166:193-206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fan Z H, Tang X J, Zheng D, et al. Study and prospect of soil acidification causes and improvement measures in tea plantation. Journal of Tea Science, 2020, 40(1):15-25. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kinraide T B. Identity of the rhizotoxic aluminum species. Plant & Soil, 1991, 134(1):167-178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sierra J, Nol C, Dufour L, et al. Mineral nutrition and growth of tropical maize as affected by soil acidity. Plant & Soil, 2003, 252(2):215-226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.