EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 396 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 396 (2023) 02010 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 396, 2023
The 11th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation & Energy Conservation in Buildings (IAQVEC2023)
Article Number 02010
Number of page(s) 8
Section Ventilation and Airflow in Buildings
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339602010
Published online 16 June 2023
  1. Bavaresco, M.V., et al., Triggering occupant behaviour for energy sustainability: Exploring subjective and comfort-related drivers in Brazilian offices. Energy Research & Social Science, 2021. 74: p. 101959. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Programme, U.N.E., 2022 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero‑emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector, U.N.E. Programme, Editor. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hamilton, I., et al., 2020 global status report for buildings and construction. United Nations Environmental Programme, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ackerly, K. and G. Brager, Window signalling systems: control strategies and occupant behaviour. Building Research & Information, 2013. 41(3): p. 342-360. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu, J., R. Yao, and R. McCloy, An investigation of thermal comfort adaptation behaviour in office buildings in the UK. Indoor and Built Environment, 2014. 23(5): p. 675-691. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gu, Y., et al., Study on influencing factors for occupant window-opening behavior: Case study of an office building in Xi'an during the transition season. Building and Environment, 2021: p. 107977. [Google Scholar]
  7. Conti, J., et al., International energy outlook 2016 with projections to 2040. 2016, USDOE Energy Information Administration (EIA), Washington, DC (United States …. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yan, D., et al., Occupant behavior modeling for building performance simulation: Current state and future challenges. Energy and buildings, 2015. 107: p. 264-278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hong, T. and H.-W. Lin, Occupant behavior: impact on energy use of private offices. 2013, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.(LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). [Google Scholar]
  10. D’Oca, S., T. Hong, and J. Langevin, The human dimensions of energy use in buildings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018. 81: p. 731-742. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Balvedi, B.F., E. Ghisi, and R. Lamberts, A review of occupant behaviour in residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2018. 174: p. 495-505. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. De Dear, R. and G.S. Brager, Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference. 1998. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yan, D., et al., IEA EBC Annex 66: Definition and simulation of occupant behavior in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2017. 156: p. 258-270. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhou, X., et al., Case study of window operating behavior patterns in an open-plan office in the summer. Energy and Buildings, 2018. 165: p. 15-24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu, W., et al., Feedback from human adaptive behavior to neutral temperature in naturally ventilated buildings: physical and psychological paths. Building and Environment, 2013. 67: p. 240-249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tong, Z., Y. Chen, and A. Malkawi, Estimating natural ventilation potential for high-rise buildings considering boundary layer meteorology. Applied energy, 2017. 193: p. 276-286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brittle, J., M. Eftekhari, and S. Firth, Mechanical ventilation & cooling energy versus thermal comfort: A study of mixed mode office building performance in Abu Dhabi. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sansaniwal, S.K., J. Mathur, and S. Mathur, Quantifying occupant's adaptive actions for controlling indoor environment in naturally ventilated buildings under composite climate of India. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021. 41: p. 102399. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang, Y. and P. Barrett, Factors influencing the occupants’ window opening behaviour in a naturally ventilated office building. Building and Environment, 2012. 50: p. 125-134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Scheuring, L. and B. Weller, An investigation of ventilation control strategies for louver windows in different climate zones. International Journal of Ventilation, 2021. 20(3-4): p. 226-235. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tong, Z., et al., Energy saving potential of natural ventilation in China: The impact of ambient air pollution. Applied energy, 2016. 179: p. 660-668. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang, L. and S. Greenberg, Window operation and impacts on building energy consumption. Energy and Buildings, 2015. 92: p. 313-321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wei, S., R. Jones, and P. de Wilde, Using building performance simulation to save residential space heating energy: A pilot testing. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  24. Iwashita, G. and H. Akasaka, The effects of human behavior on natural ventilation rate and indoor air environment in summer—a field study in southern Japan. Energy and Buildings, 1997. 25(3): p. 195-205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Su, X. and Z. Wang. Adaptive Window Opening Behavior in Office Buildings in the Severe Cold Region, China. in The International Symposium on Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning. 2019. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, N., et al., Probability of occupant operation of windows during transition seasons in office buildings. Renewable Energy, 2015. 73: p. 84-91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jia, M., et al., A systematic development and validation approach to a novel agent-based modeling of occupant behaviors in commercial buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2019. 199: p. 352-367. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Langevin, J., J. Wen, and P.L. Gurian, Simulating the human-building interaction: Development and validation of an agent-based model of office occupant behaviors. Building and Environment, 2015. 88: p. 27-45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Fu, Y., et al., A data-driven approach for window opening predictions in non-air-conditioned buildings. Intelligent Buildings International, 2021: p. 1-17. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bourikas, L., et al., Camera-based window-opening estimation in a naturally ventilated office. Building Research & Information, 2018. 46(2): p. 148-163. [Google Scholar]
  31. Day, J.K., et al., Seeing is believing: An innovative approach to post-occupancy evaluation. Energy Efficiency, 2020. 13(3): p. 473-486. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Healey, K. and M. Webster-Mannison, Exploring the influence of qualitative factors on the thermal comfort of office occupants. Architectural Science Review, 2012. 55(3): p. 169-175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Barthelmes, V.M., et al., Global Environmental Stimuli and Human-Building Interaction in Open Space Offices: A Swiss Case Study. ASHRAE Transactions, 2021. 127(1). [Google Scholar]
  34. Hong, T., et al., Ten questions concerning occupant behavior in buildings: The big picture. Building and Environment, 2017. 114: p. 518-530. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schweiker, M., Understanding occupants’ behaviour for energy efficiency in buildings. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, 2017. 4(1): p. 8-14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tian, M., et al., How does culture influence innovation? A systematic literature review. Management Decision, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kitchenham, B. and S. Charters, Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. 2007. 2. [Google Scholar]
  38. Grant, M.J. and A. Booth, A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health information & libraries journal, 2009. 26(2): p. 91-108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Page, M.J., et al., The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic reviews, 2021. 10(1): p. 1-11. [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu, W., et al., Human thermal adaptive behaviour in naturally ventilated offices for different outdoor air temperatures: A case study in Changsha China. Building and Environment, 2012. 50: p. 76-89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Warren, P. and L. Parkins, Window-opening behaviour in office buildings. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 1984. 5(3): p. 89-101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wei, S., R. Buswell, and D. Loveday, Factors affecting ‘end-of-day’window position in a non-air-conditioned office building. Energy and Buildings, 2013. 62: p. 87-96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Marín-Restrepo, L., M. Trebilcock, and M. Gillott, Occupant action patterns regarding spatial and human factors in office environments. Energy and Buildings, 2020. 214: p. 109889. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yun, G.Y., H. Kim, and J.T. Kim, Thermal and non-thermal stimuli for the use of windows in offices. Indoor and Built Environment, 2012. 21(1): p. 109-121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Haldi, F. and D. Robinson, Interactions with window openings by office occupants. Building and Environment, 2009. 44(12): p. 2378-2395. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sun, C., et al., Thermal comfort, occupant control behaviour and performance gap–a study of office buildings in north-east China using data mining. Building and Environment, 2019. 149: p. 305-321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rijal, H.B., et al., Development of an adaptive window-opening algorithm to predict the thermal comfort, energy use and overheating in buildings. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 2008. 1(1): p. 17-30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Takasu, M., et al., Study on adaptive thermal comfort in Japanese offices under various operation modes. Building and Environment, 2017. 118: p. 273-288. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mustapa, M.S., et al., Thermal comfort and occupant adaptive behaviour in Japanese university buildings with free running and cooling mode offices during summer. Building and Environment, 2016. 105: p. 332-342. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rupp, R.F., et al., Occupant behaviour in mixed-mode office buildings in a subtropical climate: Beyond typical models of adaptive actions. Building and Environment, 2021. 190: p. 107541. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yun, G.Y. and K. Steemers, Time-dependent occupant behaviour models of window control in summer. Building and environment, 2008. 43(9): p. 1471-1482. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Schakib-Ekbatan, K., et al., Does the occupant behavior match the energy concept of the building?–Analysis of a German naturally ventilated office building. Building and Environment, 2015. 84: p. 142-150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Pan, S., et al., A study on influential factors of occupant window-opening behavior in an office building in China. Building and environment, 2018. 133: p. 41-50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ren, J., et al., Comparative analysis of window operating behavior in three different open-plan offices in Nanjing. Energy and Built Environment, 2021. 2(2): p. 175-187. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Jia, M., et al. Exploring the validity of occupant behavior model for improving office building energy simulation. in 2018 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). 2018. IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  56. Vollmer, M., et al., Prediction of window handle state using machine learning. Bauphysik, 2020. 42(6): p. 352-359. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tahmasebi, F. and A. Mahdavi, An inquiry into the reliability of window operation models in building performance simulation. Building and Environment, 2016. 105: p. 343-357. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhou, X., et al., Predicting open-plan office window operating behavior using the random forest algorithm. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021. 42: p. 102514. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Mahdavi, A., et al. User interactions with environmental control systems in buildings. in PLEA 2006 - 23rd International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Conference Proceedings. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  60. Fritsch, R., et al., A stochastic model of user behaviour regarding ventilation. Building and Environment, 1990. 25(2): p. 173-181. [Google Scholar]
  61. Markovic, R., et al., Window opening model using deep learning methods. Building and Environment, 2018. 145: p. 319-329. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Tahmasebi, F. and A. Mahdavi, On the utility of occupants’ behavioural diversity information for building performance simulation: An exploratory case study. Energy and Buildings, 2018. 176: p. 380-389. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhou, X., et al. An action-based Markov chain modeling approach for predicting the window operating behavior in office spaces. in Building Simulation. 2021. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  64. Pan, S., et al., A model based on Gauss Distribution for predicting window behavior in building. Building and Environment, 2019. 149: p. 210-219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wei, S., et al., Impact of occupant behaviour on the energy-saving potential of retrofit measures for a public building in the UK. Intelligent Buildings International, 2017. 9(2): p. 97-106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Yun, G.Y. and K. Steemers, Night-time naturally ventilated offices: Statistical simulations of window-use patterns from field monitoring. Solar Energy, 2010. 84(7): p. 1216-1231. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. Damiati, S.A., et al., Field study on adaptive thermal comfort in office buildings in Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, and Japan during hot and humid season. Building and Environment, 2016. 109: p. 208-223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wei, S., R. Buswell, and D. Loveday, Factors affecting 'end-of-day' window position in a non-air-conditioned office building. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2013. 62: p. 87-96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. Marín-Restrepo, L., M. Trebilcock, and M. Gillott, Occupant action patterns regarding spatial and human factors in office environments. Energy and Buildings, 2020. 214. [Google Scholar]
  70. Wei, S., et al. Analysis of factors influencing the modelling of occupant window opening behaviour in an office building in Beijing, China. in 14th International Conference of IBPSA - Building Simulation 2015, BS 2015, Conference Proceedings. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  71. Pan, S., et al., Energy waste in buildings due to occupant behaviour, in 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY (ICAE2016). 2017. p. 2233-2238. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kim, J., et al., Analyzing the real-time indoor environmental quality factors considering the influence of the building occupants’ behaviors and the ventilation. Building and Environment, 2019. 156: p. 99-109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. Schakib-Ekbatan, K., et al., Does the occupant behavior match the energy concept of the building? - Analysis of a German naturally ventilated office building. Building and Environment, 2015. 84: p. 142-150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  74. Bourikas, L., et al., Camera-based window-opening estimation in a naturally ventilated office. Building Research and Information, 2018. 46(2): p. 148-163. [Google Scholar]
  75. Hong, T., et al., Linking human-building interactions in shared offices with personality traits. Building and Environment, 2020. 170: p. 106602. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  76. Schweiker, M., M. Hawighorst, and A. Wagner, The influence of personality traits on occupant behavioural patterns. Energy and Buildings, 2016. 131: p. 63-75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  77. Pleasants, J. and J.K. Olson, What is engineering? Elaborating the nature of engineering for K‐12 education. Science Education, 2019. 103(1): p. 145-166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  78. Hynes, M. and J. Swenson, The humanistic side of engineering: Considering social science and humanities dimensions of engineering in education and research. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2013. 3(2): p. 4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  79. D'Oca, S. and T. Hong, A data-mining approach to discover patterns of window opening and closing behavior in offices. Building and Environment, 2014. 82: p. 726-739. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  80. Schweiker, M., et al., Development and validation of a methodology to challenge the adaptive comfort model. Building and Environment, 2012. 49: p. 336-347. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  81. Schweiker, M. and A. Wagner, The effect of occupancy on perceived control, neutral temperature, and behavioral patterns. Energy and Buildings, 2016. 117: p. 246-259. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  82. Indraganti, M., R. Ooka, and H.B. Rijal, Thermal comfort in offices in India: Behavioral adaptation and the effect of age and gender. Energy and Buildings, 2015. 103: p. 284-295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  83. Indraganti, M., et al., Drivers and barriers to occupant adaptation in offices in India. Architectural Science Review, 2015. 58(1): p. 77-86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  84. Langevin, J., P.L. Gurian, and J. Wen, Tracking the human-building interaction: A longitudinal field study of occupant behavior in air-conditioned offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2015. 42: p. 94-115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  85. Bavaresco, M.V., et al., Assessing underlying effects on the choices of adaptive behaviours in offices through an interdisciplinary framework. Building and Environment, 2020. 181. [Google Scholar]
  86. Hong, T., et al., An ontology to represent energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Part I: Introduction to the DNAs framework. Building and Environment, 2015. 92: p. 764-777. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  87. Bandura, A., Prentice-Hall series in social learning theory. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  88. Ajzen, I., The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 1991. 50(2): p. 179-211. [Google Scholar]
  89. D'Oca, S., et al., Synthesizing building physics with social psychology: An interdisciplinary framework for context and occupant behavior in office buildings. Energy Research and Social Science, 2017. 34: p. 240-251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.