EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 399 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 399 (2023) 04036 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 399, 2023
International Conference on Newer Engineering Concepts and Technology (ICONNECT-2023)
Article Number 04036
Number of page(s) 7
Section Computer Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339904036
Published online 12 July 2023
  1. Friedler, S.A., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2019). A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learning. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 329–338. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2019). Fairness and machine learning. In A.J. Aschwanden (Ed.), Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 6, 35–60. [Google Scholar]
  3. Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 77–91. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chouldechova, A. (2017). Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. Big Data, 5(2), 153–163. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012). Fairness through awareness. Proceedings of the Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, 214–226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Friedler, S.A., & Scheidegger, C. (2016). On the (im)possibility of fairness. Proceedings of the Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, 117–129. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., & Raghavan, M. (2017). Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores. Proceedings of the Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, 43–52. [Google Scholar]
  8. Narayanan, A., & Zevenbergen, B. (2018). No classification without representation: Assessing geodiversity issues in open data sets and suggesting remedies. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 150–159. [Google Scholar]
  9. Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Raji, I.D., & Buolamwini, J. (2019). Actionable auditing: Investigating the impact of publicly naming biased performance results of commercial AI products. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 353–362. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sweeney, L. (2013). Discrimination in online ad delivery. Communications of the ACM, 56(5), 44–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Veale, M., van Kleek, M., & Binns, R. (2018). Fairer machine learning in the real world: Mitigating discrimination without collecting sensitive data. Big Data & Society, 5(2), 205395171875668. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zliobaite, I. (2015). A survey on measuring indirect discrimination in machine learning. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 29(3), 583–622. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.W., Zou, J.Y., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A.T. (2016). Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 4349–4357. [Google Scholar]
  15. Caliskan, A., Bryson, J.J., & Narayanan, A. (2017). Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science, 356(6334), 183–186. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Barwal, R.K., Raheja, N., Mohan, B.R., Yamuna, U., Gadde, S.S., & Patil, M. (2023). Analysis and classification of breast cancer disease via different datasets and classifier models. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11, 135–143. doi: 10.17762/ijritcc.v11i3s.6174 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Aluka, M., Ganesan, S., & Vijay Pal Reddy, P. (2023). A comparative study on pretraining models of deep learning to detect lung cancer. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11(1), 148–155. Retrieved from www.scopus.com [Google Scholar]
  18. Saini, D.J.B. ., & Qureshi, D.I.. (2021). Feature Extraction and Classification-Based Face Recognition Using Deep Learning Architectures. Research Journal of Computer Systems and Engineering, 2(1), 52–57. Retrieved from https://technicalj ournals.org/RJ CSE/index.php/journal/article/view/23 [Google Scholar]
  19. Wilson, T., Johnson, M., Gonzalez, L., Rodriguez, L., & Silva, A. Machine Learning Techniques for Engineering Workforce Management. Kuwait Journal of Machine Learning, 1(2). Retrieved from http://kuwaitjournals.com/index.php/kjml/article/view/120 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dhabliya, D. (2021). An Integrated Optimization Model for Plant Diseases Prediction with Machine Learning Model . Machine Learning Applications in Engineering Education and Management, 1(2), 21–26. Retrieved from http://yashikajournals.com/index.php/mlaeem/article/view/15 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.