Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 399, 2023
International Conference on Newer Engineering Concepts and Technology (ICONNECT-2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 05003 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Safety | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339905003 | |
| Published online | 12 July 2023 | |
- Ahmed I. Sultana I. Paul S. K. Azeem A. Employee performance evaluation: A fuzzy approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(7), (2013). [Google Scholar]
- Manoharan T. R. Muralidharan C. Deshmukh S.G. An integrated fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making model for employees' performance appraisal. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(3), (2011). [Google Scholar]
- Fukui N. Changes in Performance Appraisal in Japanese Companies. In Kambayashi N. (Ed.), Japanese Management in Change (pp. 141–157). Springer Japan (2015). [Google Scholar]
- Manoharan T. R. Muralidharan C. Deshmukh S.G. A composite model for employees' performance appraisal and improvement. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(4), 448–480 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Avazpour R. Ebrahimi E. Fathi M.R.A 360 Degree Feedback Model for Performance Appraisal Based on Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences, 2(11), 969–976 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- Higgs, M., Influence of team composition and task complexity on team performance, Team Performance Management, Vol. 11 Nos 7/8, pp. 227–250 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Yusliza, M., & Ramayah, T. Determinants of Attitude Towards E-HRM: an Empirical Study Among HR Professionals. Paper presented at the International Conference on Asia Pacific Business Innovation and Technology Management (2012). [Google Scholar]
- Dulebohn J. H. Johnson R.D. Human resource metrics and decision support: A classification framework. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 71–83 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nudurupati S. S. Bititci U.S. Kumar V. Chan F.T.S. State of the art literature review on performance measurement. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 60(2), 279–290 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wua, H.-Y., Tezng, G.-H. and Chen., Y.-H. A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on balanced scorecard”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 10135–10147 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tuzkaya, G., Ozgen, A., Ozgen, D. and Tuzkaya, U.R. Environmental performance evaluation of suppliers: a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 477–490 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Santhanam, V., R. Dhanaraj, M. Chandrasekaran, N. Venkateshwaran, and S. Baskar. Experimental investigation on the mechanical properties of woven hybrid fiber reinforced epoxy composite. Materials Today: Proceedings 37: 1850–1853 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sahu, N.K., Datta, S. and Mahapatra, S.S. Performance evaluation of green supplier using generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers set”, National Conference on Emerging Challenges for Sustainable Business, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, June 1-2, pp. 1791–1811 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- Yarahmadi, R. and Sadoughi, S. “Evaluating and prioritizing of performance indices of environment using fuzzy TOPSIS”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 2713–2719 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zemkova, B. “Fuzzy sets in HR management”, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 113–124 (2011). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.