EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 403 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 403 (2023) 01030 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 403, 2023
XII International Scientific and Practical Forum “Environmentally Sustainable Cities and Settlements: Problems and Solutions” (ESCP-2023)
Article Number 01030
Number of page(s) 16
Section Real Estate Development in the Formation of Environmentally Sustainable Cities
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340301030
Published online 25 July 2023
  1. C. Iriarte and S. Bayona, “It projects success factors: A literature review,” International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 49–78, 2020, doi: 10.12821/IJISPM080203. [Google Scholar]
  2. “Headline Verdana Bold Project management efficiency analysis (PPA),” 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Miterev, M. Mancini, and R. Turner, “Towards a design for the project-based organization,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 479–491, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2016.12.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. L. K. Gurieva, E. M. Akhmetshin, A. N. Savicheva, V. I. Kataeva (Sventa Yarvik), and A. N. Norkina, “Theoretical foundations of management of the organization: Development, types of structures, management methods of control,” International Business Management, vol. 10, no. 22, pp. 5406–5416, 2016, doi: 10.3923/IBM.2016.5406.5416. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. C. C. França, T. B. Gouveia, P. C. F. Santos, C. A. Santana, and F. Q. B. da Silva, “Motivation in software engineering: A systematic review update,” IET Seminar Digest, vol. 2011, no. 1, pp. 154–163, 2011, doi: 10.1049/IC.2011.0019. [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Power, “Social Contracts, Simple Rules and Self-organization: A Perspective on Agile Development,” Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 179 LNBIP, pp. 277–284, 2014, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-06862-6_21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Trendowicz and J. Münch, “Chapter 6 Factors Influencing Software Development Productivity-State-of-the-Art and Industrial Experiences,” Advances in Computers, vol. 77, pp. 185–241, 2009, doi: 10.1016/S0065-2458(09)01206-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Ahmed, S. Ahmad, N. Ehsan, E. Mirza, and S. Z. Sarwar, “Agile software development: Impact on productivity and quality,” 5th IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, ICMIT2010, pp. 287–291, 2010, doi: 10.1109/ICMIT.2010.5492703. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Smolarz, E. Μ. Kuzmina, S. A. Yaremko, R. V. Ignatovska, T. V. Sichko, and S. Smailova, “Methods and techniques for evaluating effectiveness of information technology implementation into business processes,” p. 25, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1117/12.2500620. [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Jayawarna and A. W. Pearson, “Managing quality in the product development process: Impact and implications through case study evidence,” International Journal of Business Performance Management, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 57–75, 2002, doi: 10.1504/IJBPM.2002.000108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Punniyamoorthy and R. Murali, “Identification of benchmarking service units through productivity and quality dimensions,” International Journal of Business Performance Management, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 103–122, 2010, doi: 10.1504/IJBPM.2010.038232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Parviainen, M. Tihinen, J. Kääriäinen, and S. Teppola, “Tackling the digitalization challenge: how to benefit from digitalization in practice,” International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 63–77, 2017, doi: 10.12821/ijispm050104. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Cline, E. P. Lee, and B. G. Lee, “Design and development of software configuration management tool to support process performance monitoring and analysis,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 4488 LNCS, no. PART 2, pp. 1123–1130, 2007, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-72586-2_157. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Miklosik, “Improving Project Management Performance through Capability Maturity Measurement,” Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 30, pp. 522–530, 2015, doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01264-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fapohunda, Tinuke. (2013). Towards Effective Team Building in the Workplace. [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Jain, A. Sharma, and L. Ahuja, “The Impact of Agile Software Development Process on the Quality of Software Product,” 2018 7th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization: Trends and Future Directions, ICRITO 2018, pp. 812–815, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICRITO.2018.8748529. [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Koopmans, C. M. Bernaards, V. H. Hildebrandt, H. C. W. de Vet, and A. J. van der Beek, “Measuring individual work performance: Identifying and selecting indicators,” Work, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 229–238, 2014, doi: 10.3233/WOR-131659. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Muchiri, L. Pintelon, L. Gelders, and H. Martin, “Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 295–302, May 2011, doi: 10.1016/J.IJPE.2010.04.039. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Gajda, “Professional Adaptation of New Employees to the Organization,” System Safety: Human - Technical Facility - Environment, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 929–938, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.2478/CZOTO-2019-0118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Oliveira, T. Conte, M. Cristo, and N. Valentim, “Influence Factors in Software Productivity - A Tertiary Literature Review,” International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, vol. 28, no. 11-12, pp. 1795–1810, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1142/S0218194018400296. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. V. Newton, A. Greenberg, and J. See, “Project management implications and implementation roadmap of human readiness levels,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 10293 LNCS, pp. 99–111, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-58481-2_9. [Google Scholar]
  22. “Chapter 7: Roles and Responsibilities.” https://www.agilebusiness.org/page/ProjectFramework_07_RolesResponsibilities (accessed Dec. 20, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  23. E. Murphy-Hill et al., “What Predicts Software Developers’ Productivity?,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 582–594, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TSE.2019.2900308. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. “User Stories | Examples and Template | Atlassian.” https://www.atlassian.com/agile/project-management/user-stories (accessed Dec. 20, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  25. “(PDF) The Impact of Agile Methodology (DSDM) on Software Project Management.” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323572478_The_Impact_of_Agile_Methodology_DSDM_on_Software_Project_Management (accessed Dec. 20, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  26. E. D. Canedo and G. A. Santos, “Factors affecting software development productivity: An empirical study,” PervasiveHealth: Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, pp. 307–316, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1145/3350768.3352491. [Google Scholar]
  27. L. Machuca-Villegas and G. P. Gasca-Hurtado, “Towards a Social and Human Factor Classification Related to Productivity in Software Development Teams,” Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 1071, pp. 36–50, 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33547-2_4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. S. A. Butt, S. Misra, M. W. Anjum, and S. A. Hassan, “Agile Project Development Issues During COVID-19,” Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 408, pp. 59–70, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-67084-9_4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Fundamentals of Microsoft Solution Framework Turner M. ISBN 978-5-7502-0306-2 - <url> (n.d.). Retrieved December 20, 2021, from https://ibooks.ru/products/25123 [Google Scholar]
  30. I. Fatema and K. Sakib, “Factors Influencing Productivity of Agile Software Development Teamwork: A Qualitative System Dynamics Approach,” Proceedings - Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, APSEC, vol. 2017-December, pp. 737–742, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1109/APSEC.2017.95. [Google Scholar]
  31. Optimization methods in examples and problems. Panteleev A.V., Letova T.A. (n.d.). Retrieved December 20, 2022, from https://libren.org/d/math-stud/math-st888.htm [Google Scholar]
  32. Modeling of business processes in the software environment CA ERWIN Process Modeler. (n.d.). Retrieved December 20, 2022, from https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19985117 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.