EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 403 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 403 (2023) 08002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 403, 2023
XII International Scientific and Practical Forum “Environmentally Sustainable Cities and Settlements: Problems and Solutions” (ESCP-2023)
Article Number 08002
Number of page(s) 7
Section Development of Sustainable Cities: Economic, Social and Humanitarian Aspects
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340308002
Published online 25 July 2023
  1. Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media of the Russian Federation (2022). Digital Public Administration. Retrieved from https://digital.gov.ru/ru/activity/directions/882/?utm_referrer=https%3a%2f%2fwww.google.com%2f (in Russ.) [Google Scholar]
  2. Henrique, B. M., Sobreiro, V. A., & Kimura, H. (2020). Contracting in Brazilian public administration: A machine learning approach. Expert Systems, 37(5), e12550. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Nguyen, L. V., & Seidu, R. (2022). Application of Regression-Based Machine Learning Algorithms in Sewer Condition Assessment for Ålesund City, Norway. Water, 14(24), 3993. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kim, H., MacDonald, R. H., & Andersen, D. F. (2013). Simulation and managerial decision making: a double-loop learning framework. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 291–300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tao, L., Liang, H., Wen, B., & Huang, T. Between Nature and Nurture: The Genetic Overlap between Psychological Attributes and Selection into Public Service Employment. Public Administration Review. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bastani, H., Drakopoulos, K., & Gupta, V. (2021). Interpretable OR for High-Stakes Decisions: Designing the Greek COVID-19 Testing System. Available at SSRN 3916367. [Google Scholar]
  7. Coulthart, S., & Riccucci, R. (2022). Putting big data to work in government: the case of the United States border patrol. Public Administration Review, 82(2), 280–289. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fesenko, G., Fesenko, T., Fesenko, H., Shakhov, A., Yakunin, A., & Korzhenko, V. (2021). Developing e-maturity model for municipal project and program management system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(3), 109. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hall, J. L., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2019). A norm of evidence and research in decision-making (NERD): scale development, reliability, and validity. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 321–329. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Isett, K. R., & Hicks, D. (2020). Pathways from research into public decision making: Intermediaries as the third community. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(1), 45–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kamolov, S., & Aleksandrov, N. (2022, February). Methodology of decision support systems for digital public governance. In NISPAcee conferences 2021 proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hansen, M. B., & Nørup, I. (2017). Leading the implementation of ICT innovations. Public Administration Review, 77(6), 851–860. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kritas, D., Sidiropoulos, S., & Kakouris, D. (2021, February). (Total Quality Management and Leadership: A Way to Improve Healthcare Services in Greece). In Sidiropoulos, S., Tzagkarakis, S.-I., Kritas, D.(2021), 1st POLITEIA International Conference Proceedings. Europe at the Crossroads: Leadership, Challenges and State of Play, Athens: Hellenic Association of Political Scientists. [Google Scholar]
  14. Munteanu, I., & Newcomer, K. (2020). Leading and learning through dynamic performance management in government. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 316–325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rivera-Lisboa, D. I., & Tironi, M. Artificial Intelligence in the New Forms of Environmental Governance in the Chilean State: Narratives, Operations and Frictions. Operations and Frictions. [Google Scholar]
  16. Stephany, F., Stoehr, N., Darius, P., Neuhäuser, L., Teutloff, O., & Braesemann, F. (2020). The CoRisk-Index: A data-mining approach to identify industry-specific risk assessments related to COVID-19 in real-time. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.12432. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ullah, I., Hussain, S., Akhoubzi, W., Hussain, S., Riaz, M.K., Jamil, S., & Parveen, A.P. (2021). Impact Evaluation of the Land Record Management Information System in the Punjab Province, Pakistan. KDI School of Pub Policy & Management Paper. [Google Scholar]
  18. Vogl, T.M., Seidelin, C., Ganesh, B., & Bright, J. (2020). Smart technology and the emergence of algorithmic bureaucracy: Artificial intelligence in UK local authorities. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 946–961. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang, F., Li, S., Gao, Y., Li, M., & Wu, P. (2022). Inconsistent Carbon Budget Estimation Using Dynamic/Static Carbon Density under Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Case Study in Henan Province, China. Land, 11(12), 2232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505–523. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhao, W., & Zou, Y. (2021). Smart urban governance in epidemic control: Practices and implications of Hangzhou. Chinese Public Administration Review, 12(1), 51–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Malin, A. S., & Mukhin, V. I. (2002). Research of control systems. M.: GU HSE, 397, 3. [Google Scholar]
  23. Boole, G. (1847). The mathematical analysis of logic. Philosophical Library. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kamolov, S. G. (2019). On the gnoseological essence of “smart cities”. Innovations and Investments, (1), 200–204. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.