EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 405 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 405 (2023) 03006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 405, 2023
2023 International Conference on Sustainable Technologies in Civil and Environmental Engineering (ICSTCE 2023)
Article Number 03006
Number of page(s) 9
Section Structural Engineering & Concrete Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340503006
Published online 26 July 2023
  1. T. S. Santos, L. da S. Portugal, P. C. M. Ribeiro, Evaluating the Performance of Highway Concessions through Public-Private Partnerships Using a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Procedure. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 10, 100399 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  2. Z. Lu, Q. Meng, Effects of Asymmetric Investment Cost Information on Revenue-Compensated Build-Operate-Transfer Highway Contracts. Transp. Res. B: Methodol. 172, 71–92 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Hassan, A. R. Ibrahim, Investing in Toll Highway: Private or Public Financing with Scenario-Based Solution. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 21, 133–148 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Massiani, G. Ragazzi, Costs and Efficiency of Highway Concessionaires: A Survey of Italian Operators. Eur. Transp. 85–106 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Zhu, F. Hou, T. Feng, T. Li, C. Song, An Information Model for Highway Operational Risk Management Based on the IFC-Brick Schema. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. (2023) [Google Scholar]
  6. S. B. Prakash, R. Kirkham, A. Nanda, S. Coleman, Exploring the Complexity of Highways Infrastructure Programmes in the United Kingdom through Systems Thinking. Proj. Lead. Soc. 4, 100081 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Batarce, F. Basso, L. J. Basso, The Elasticity of Demand on Urban Highways: The Case of Santiago. Transp. Pol. 133, 234–241 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. X. Wang, C. Cheng, J. Li, J. Zhang, G. Ma, J. Jin, Automated Monitoring and Evaluation of Highway Subgrade Compaction Quality Using Artificial Neural Networks. Autom. Constr. 145, 104663 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Petrović, M. Nikolić, U. Bugarić, B. Delibašić, P. Lio, Controlling Highway Toll Stations Using Deep Learning, Queuing Theory, and Differential Evolution. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 119, 105683 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. X. Qin, Y. Wang, S. Cui, S. Liu, S. Liu, V. W. Wangari, Post-Assessment of the Eco-Environmental Impact of Highway Construction– A Case Study of Changbai Mountain Ring Road. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 98, 106963 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. Gao, T. Gao, Y. Wu, P. Wang, Q. He, Low-Construction-Emission Cross-Section Optimization for Mountainous Highway Alignment Designs. Transp. Res. D: Transp. Environ. 105, 103249 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. C. M. Defalque, A. F. da Silva, F. A. S. Marins, Goal Programming Model Applied to Waste Paper Logistics Processes. Appl. Math. Model. 98, 185–206 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. R. A. Ghaffar, M. G. Hasan, Z. Ashraf, M. F. Khan, Fuzzy Goal Programming with an Imprecise Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations. Symmetry, 12, 1548 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Mirzaee, B. Naderi, S. H. R. Pasandideh, A Preemptive Fuzzy Goal Programming Model for Generalized Supplier Selection and Order Allocation with Incremental Discount. Comput. Ind. Eng. 122, 292–302 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Feng, Z. Gong, Z. Integrated Linguistic Entropy Weight Method and Multi-Objective Programming Model for Supplier Selection and Order Allocation in a Circular Economy: A Case Study. J. Clean. Prod. 277, 122597 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, R. O. Ferguson, Optimal Estimation of Executive Compensation by Linear Programming. Manag. Sci. 1, 138–151 (1955) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming. Manag. Sci. 4, 38–91 (1957) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Kaur, J., O. Singh, A. Anand, M. Agarwal, A Goal Programming Approach for Agile-Based Software Development Resource Allocation. Decis. Anal. J. 6, 100146 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. I. Yilmaz, L. Polat, Celiac Disease Multi-Purpose Diet Plan through Integrated Goal Programming and Interval Type 2 Fuzzy TOPSIS Method. Expert Syst. Appl. 218, 119618 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Hasani, R. Sheikh, Robust goal programming approach for healthcare network management for perishable products under disruption, Appl. Math. Model. 117, 399–416 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Y. Wang, W. M. Chen, Y. Liu, Collaborative Product Portfolio Design Based on the Approach of Multichoice Goal Programming. Math. Prob. Eng. e6678533 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Aksaraylı, O. Pala, A Polynomial Goal Programming Model for Portfolio Optimization Based on Entropy and Higher Moments. Expert Syst. Appl. 94, 185-192 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. W. S. Lam, W. H. Lam, S. H. Jaaman, Portfolio Optimization with a Mean–Absolute Deviation–Entropy Multi-Objective Model. Entropy 23, 1266 (2021) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Gupta, M. K. Mehlawat, S. Yadav, A. Kumar, A Polynomial Goal Programming Approach for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Portfolio Optimization Using Entropy and Higher Moments. Appl. Soft Comput. 85, 105781 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Hocine, Z. Y. Zhuang, N. Kouaissah, D. C. Li, Weighted-Additive Fuzzy Multi-Choice Goal Programming (WA-FMCGP) for Supporting Renewable Energy Site Selection Decisions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 285, 642-654 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ö. N. Bilişik, H. Baraçlı, A Binary Fuzzy Goal Programming Model with Fuzzy Parameters to Select the Fruits and Vegetables Market Hall Location for Istanbul. Expert Syst. Appl. 211, 118490 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. N. Wichapa, P. Khokhajaikiat, Solving Multi-Objective Facility Location Problem Using the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Goal Programming: A Case Study on Infectious Waste Disposal Centers. Oper. Res. Perspect. 4, 39-48 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Gezen, A. Karaaslan, Energy Planning Based on Vision-2023 of Turkey with a Goal Programming under Fuzzy Multi-Objectives. Energy, 261, 124956 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. E. Bakhtavar, T. Prabatha, H. Karunathilake, R. Sadiq, K. Hewage, Assessment of Renewable Energy-Based Strategies for Net-Zero Energy Communities: A Planning Model Using Multi-Objective Goal Programming. J. Clean. Prod. 272, 122886 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. N. Akbari, D. Jones, F. Arabikhan, Goal Programming Models with Interval Coefficients for the Sustainable Selection of Marine Renewable Energy Projects in the UK. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 293, 748-760 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. S. S. Karakutuk, M. A. Ornek, A Goal Programming Approach to Lean Production System Implementation. J Oper Res Soc 74, 403-416 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Haque, S. K. Paul, R. Sarker, D. Essam, A Combined Approach for Modeling Multi-Echelon Multi-Period Decentralized Supply Chain. Ann Oper Res 315, 1665-1702 (2022) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. V. Charles, S. Gupta, I. Ali, A Fuzzy Goal Programming Approach for Solving Multi-Objective Supply Chain Network Problems with Pareto-Distributed Random Variables. Int. J. Unc. Fuzz. Knowl. Based Syst. 27, 559-593 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. D. Deliktaş, S. Karagoz, V. Simić, N. Aydin, A Stochastic Fermatean Fuzzy-Based Multi-Choice Conic Goal Programming Approach for Sustainable Supply Chain Management in End-of-Life Buildings. J. Clean. Prod. 382, 135305 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. B. A. Halim, H. A. Karim, N. A. Fahami, N. F. Mahad, S. K. S. Nordin, N. Hassan, Bank Financial Statement Management Using a Goal Programming Model. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 211, 498–504 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. A. Ahmadini, F. Ahmad, A Novel Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations for Multiobjective Goal Programming Problems. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 40, 1–17 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. A. AlArjani, T. Alam, Lexicographic Goal Programming Model for Bank’s Performance Management. J. Appl. Math. e8011578 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  38. T. Alam, Modeling and Analyzing a Multi-Objective Financial Planning Model Using Goal Programming. Appl. Syst. Innov. 5, 128 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. W. S. Lam, S. H. Jaaman, H. Ismail, An empirical comparison of different optimization models in enhanced index tracking problem. Adv. Sci. Lett. 21(5), 1278-1281 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. P. F. Lee, W. S. Lam, W. H. Lam, Evaluation and Improvement of the Efficiency of Logistics Companies with Data Envelopment Analysis Model. Eng. J. 25, 45–54 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. W. S. Lam, S. H. Jaaman, H. Ismail, Comparison between two-stage regression model and variance model in portfolio optimization. J. Applied Sci. & Agric. 9(18), 36-40 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  42. P. F. Lee, W. S. Lam, W. H. Lam, Performance Evaluation of the Efficiency of Logistics Companies with Data Envelopment Analysis Model. Mathematics 11, 718 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. W. S. Lam, S. H. Jaaman, H. Ismail, Index tracking modelling in portfolio optimization with mixed integer linear programming. J. Applied Sci. & Agric. 9(18), 47-50 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  44. X. Wu, Y. Wu, X. Cheng, C. Cheng, Z. Li, Y. Wu, A Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Model for Hydro Unit Commitment Considering Operation Constraint Priorities. Renewable Energy 204, 507–520 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.