EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 405 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 405 (2023) 04019 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 405, 2023
2023 International Conference on Sustainable Technologies in Civil and Environmental Engineering (ICSTCE 2023)
Article Number 04019
Number of page(s) 16
Section Sustainable Technologies in Construction & Environmental Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340504019
Published online 26 July 2023
  1. Arriga, N., Rannik, Ü., Aubinet, M., Carrara, A., Vesala, T., Papale, D., 2017. Experimental validation of footprint models for eddy covariance CO2 flux measurements above grassland by means of natural and artificial tracers. Agric. For. Meteorol. 242, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.04.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aubinet, M., Grelle, A., Ibrom, A., Rannik, Ü., Moncrieff, J., Foken, T., Kowalski, A.S., Martin, P.H., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., 1999. Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology. Adv. Ecol. Res. 30, 113–175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beyrich, F., Leps, J.-P., Mauder, M., Bange, J., Foken, T., Huneke, S., Lohse, H., Lüdi, A., Meijninger, W.M.L., Mironov, D., Weisensee, U., Zittel, P., 2006. Area-Averaged Surface Fluxes Over the Litfass Region Based on Eddy-Covariance Measurements. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 121, 33–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9052-x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beyrich, F., Richter, S.H., Weisensee, U., Kohsiek, W., Lohse, H., de Bruin, H.A.R., Foken, Th., Göckede, M., Berger, F., Vogt, R., Batchvarova, E., 2002. Experimental determination of turbulent fluxes over the heterogeneous LITFASS area: Selected results from the LITFASS-98 experiment. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 73, 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-002-0691-7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deshpande, S., Bhattacharya, I., Malheiros-Silveira, G., Ng, K.W., Schuster, F., Mantei, W., Cook, K., Chang-Hasnain, C., 2017. Ultracompact Position-Controlled InP Nanopillar LEDs on Silicon with Bright Electroluminescence at Telecommunication Wavelengths [WWW Document]. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00065 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ehleringer, J.R., Cerling, T.E., 2002. C3 and C4 photosynthesis. Encycl. Glob. Environ. Change 2. [Google Scholar]
  7. FAO, F., 2011. Available online at: http://faostat. fao. org/site/291/default. aspx. Food Agric. Organ. [Google Scholar]
  8. Feigenwinter, C., Vogt, R., Christen, A., 2012. Eddy Covariance Measurements Over Urban Areas, in: Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., Papale, D. (Eds.), Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer Atmospheric Sciences. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2351-1_16 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Foken, T., Göockede, M., Mauder, M., Mahrt, L., Amiro, B., Munger, W., 2005. Post-Field Data Quality Control, in: Lee, X., Massman, W., Law, B. (Eds.), Handbook of Micrometeorology: A Guide for Surface Flux Measurement and Analysis, Atmospheric and Oceanographic Sciences Library. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 181–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2265-4_9 [Google Scholar]
  10. Foken, T., Leclerc, M.Y., 2004. Methods and limitations in validation of footprint models. Agric. For. Meteorol., Flux and Concentration Footprints 127, 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.07.015 [Google Scholar]
  11. Foken, Th., Wichura, B., 1996. Tools for quality assessment of surface-based flux measurements. Agric. For. Meteorol. 78, 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(95)02248-1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Göckede, M., Markkanen, T., Hasager, C.B., Foken, T., 2006. Update of a Footprint-Based Approach for the Characterisation of Complex Measurement Sites. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 118, 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-6435-3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Göckede, M., Markkanen, T., Mauder, M., Arnold, K., Leps, J.-P., Foken, T., 2005a. Validation of footprint models using natural tracer measurements from a field experiment. Agric. For. Meteorol. 135, 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.12.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Göckede, M., Markkanen, T., Mauder, M., Arnold, K., Leps, J.-P., Foken, T., 2005b. Validation of footprint models using natural tracer measurements from a field experiment. Agric. For. Meteorol. 135, 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.12.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Göckede, M., Rebmann, C., Foken, T., 2004a. A combination of quality assessment tools for eddy covariance measurements with footprint modelling for the characterisation of complex sites. Agric. For. Meteorol., Flux and Concentration Footprints 127, 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.07.012 [Google Scholar]
  16. Göckede, M., Rebmann, C., Foken, T., 2004b. A combination of quality assessment tools for eddy covariance measurements with footprint modelling for the characterisation of complex sites. Agric. For. Meteorol., Flux and Concentration Footprints 127, 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.07.012 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hasager, C.B., Jensen, N.O., 1999. Surface-flux aggregation in heterogeneous terrain. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 125, 2075–2102. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712555808 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Heidbach, K., Schmid, H.P., Mauder, M., 2017. Experimental evaluation of flux footprint models. Agric. For. Meteorol. 246, 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.06.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Horst, T.W., 1999. The Footprint for Estimation of Atmosphere-Surface Exchange Fluxes by Profile Techniques. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 90, 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001774726067 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Horst, T.W., Weil, J.C., 1994. How Far is Far Enough?: The Fetch Requirements for Micrometeorological Measurement of Surface Fluxes. J. Atmospheric Ocean. Technol. 11, 1018–1025. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011<1018:HFIFET>2.0.CO;2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Horst, T.W., Weil, J.C., 1992. Footprint estimation for scalar flux measurements in the atmospheric surface layer. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 59, 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119817 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hsieh, C.-I., Katul, G., Chi, T., 2000. An approximate analytical model for footprint estimation of scalar fluxes in thermally stratified atmospheric flows. Adv. Water Resour. 23, 765–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(99)00042-1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang, T., Yang, G., Tang, G., 1979. A fast two-dimensional median filtering algorithm. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 27, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1979.1163188 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hui, Z., Xuefa, W., 2015. Flux footprint climatology estimated by three analytical models over a subtropical coniferous plantation in Southeast China. J Meteor Res 29, 654–666. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jain, M., Mondal, P., DeFries, R.S., Small, C., Galford, G.L., 2013. Mapping cropping intensity of smallholder farms: A comparison of methods using multiple sensors. Remote Sens. Environ. 134, 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.029 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kaharabata, S.K., Schuepp, P.H., Ogunjemiyo, S., Shen, S., Leclerc, M.Y., Desjardins, R.L., MacPherson, J.I., 1997. Footprint considerations in BOREAS. J. Geophys. Res. Atmospheres 102, 29113–29124. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD02559 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kljun, N., Calanca, P., Rotach, M.W., Schmid, H.P., 2015. A simple two-dimensional parameterisation for Flux Footprint Prediction (FFP). Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 3695–3713. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kljun, N., Calanca, P., Rotach, M.W., Schmid, H.P., 2004. A Simple Parameterisation for Flux Footprint Predictions. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 112, 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BOUN.0000030653.71031.96 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kljun, N., Rotach, M.W., Schmid, H.P., 2002. A Three-Dimensional Backward Lagrangian Footprint Model For A Wide Range Of Boundary-Layer Stratifications. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 103, 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014556300021 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Köppen, W., 1884. Translated by Volken, E.; Brönnimann, S.” Die Wärmezonen der Erde, nach der Dauer der heissen, gemässigten und kalten Zeit und nach der Wirkung der Wärme auf die organische Welt betrachtet”[The thermal zones of the earth according to the duration of hot, moderate and cold periods and to the impact of heat on the organic world)]. Meteorol Z 20, 351–360. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kormann, R., Meixner, F.X., 2001. An Analytical Footprint Model For Non-Neutral Stratification. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 99, 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018991015119 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kumar, A., 2017. Dynamics of Access to Rural Credit in India: Patterns, Determinants and Implications, in: Bathla, S., Dubey, A. (Eds.), Changing Contours of Indian Agriculture: Investment, Income and Non-Farm Employment. Springer, Singapore, pp. 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6014-4_3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kumari, S., Kambhammettu, B.V.N.P., Niyogi, D., 2020. Sensitivity of Analytical Flux Footprint Models in Diverse Source-Receptor Configurations: A Field Experimental Study. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosciences 125, e2020JG005694. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005694 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Leclerc, M.Y., Foken, T., 2014b. Footprints in Micrometeorology and Ecology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54545-0 [Google Scholar]
  35. Leclerc, M.Y., Foken, T., 2014c. Surface-Layer Properties and Parameterizations, in: Leclerc, M.Y., Foken, T. (Eds.), Footprints in Micrometeorology and Ecology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 21–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54545-0_2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Leclerc, M.Y., Thurtell, G.W., 1990. Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes using a Markovian analysis. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 52, 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122089 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Leuning, R., 2007. The correct form of the Webb, Pearman and Leuning equation for eddy fluxes of trace gases in steady and non-steady state, horizontally homogeneous flows. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 123, 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9138-5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Leuning, R., Denmead, O.T., Lang, A.R.G., Ohtaki, E., 1982. Effects of heat and water vapor transport on eddy covariance measurement of CO2 fluxes. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 23, 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123298 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Longdoz, B., Granier, A., 2012. Eddy Covariance Measurements over Forests, in: Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., Papale, D. (Eds.), Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer Atmospheric Sciences. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2351-1_11 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Peddinti, S.R., Kambhammettu, B.V.N.P., Lad, R.S., Šimůnek, J., Gade, R.M., Adinarayana, J., 2020. A macroscopic soil-water transport model to simulate root water uptake in the presence of water and disease stress. J. Hydrol. 587, 124940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124940 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.