Open Access
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 405, 2023
2023 International Conference on Sustainable Technologies in Civil and Environmental Engineering (ICSTCE 2023)
Article Number 04031
Number of page(s) 18
Section Sustainable Technologies in Construction & Environmental Engineering
Published online 26 July 2023
  1. International Energy Agency (IEA), World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI) (2018) Technology Roadmap - LowCarbon Transition in the Cement Industry, France [Google Scholar]
  2. Editorial, 2021 Concrete needs to lose its colossal carbon footprint Nat [Google Scholar]
  3. Monteiro J, Roussanaly S (2022) CCUS scenarios for the cement industry is CO2 utilization feasible? J CO2 Util. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bilodeau A, Malhotra VM (2000) High-volume fly ash system: concrete solution for sustainable development. ACI Mater J. [Google Scholar]
  5. Herrmann A, Koenig A, Dehn F (2017) Structural concrete based on alkali-activated binders: terminology, reaction mechanisms, mix designs and performance. Struct Concr. [Google Scholar]
  6. Document 52019DC0640, Der europa¨ische Gru¨ne Deal, 2019. European Kommision [Google Scholar]
  7. Firdous R, Stephan D (2019) Effect of silica modulus on the geopolymerization activity of natural pozzolans. Constr Build Mater. [Google Scholar]
  8. Firdous R, Stephan D, Djobo JNY (2018) Natural pozzolan based geopolymers: a review on mechanical, microstructural and durability characteristics. Constr Build Mater. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.191 [Google Scholar]
  9. Provis JL, van Deventer JSJ (2014) Alkali activated materials, state-of-the-art report, RILEM TC 224-AAM. Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dontriros S, Nooaek P, Supakata N (2020) Geopolymer bricks from concrete residue and palm oil fuel ash: evaluating physical-mechanical properties, life cycle assessment and economic feasibility. EnvironmentAsia. 10.14456/EA.2020.14 [Google Scholar]
  11. Colangelo F, Farina I, Travaglioni M, Salzano C, Cioffi R, Petrillo A (2021) Eco-efficient industrial waste recycling for the manufacturing of fibre reinforced innovative geopolymer mortars: Integrated waste management and green product development through LCA. J Clean Prod. 1016/j.jclepro.2021.127777 [Google Scholar]
  12. Jiang M, Chen X, Rajabipour F, Hendrickson CT (2014) Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional, glass powder, and alkali-activated slag concrete and mortar. J Infrastruct Syst. [Google Scholar]
  13. Marinkovic´ S, Dragasˇ J, Ignjatovic´ I, Tosˇic´ N (2017) Environmental assessment of green concretes for structural use. J Clean Prod. [Google Scholar]
  14. Teh SH, Wiedmann T, Castel A, de Burgh J (2017) Hybrid life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from cement, concrete and geopolymer concrete in Australia. J Clean Prod. [Google Scholar]
  15. Abdulkareem M, Havukainen J, Horttanainen M (2019) How environmentally sustainable are fibre reinforced alkaliactivated concretes? J Clean Prod. [Google Scholar]
  16. Robayo-Salazar R, Mejı´a-Arcila J, Mejı´a de Gutie´rrez R, Martı´nez E (2018) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of an alkaliactivated binary concrete based on natural volcanic pozzolan: a comparative analysis to OPC concrete. Constr Build Mater. [Google Scholar]
  17. Yang K-H, Song J-K, Song K-I (2013) Assessment of CO2 reduction of alkali-activated concrete. J Clean Prod. [Google Scholar]
  18. Turner LK, Collins FG (2013) Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: a comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Constr Build Mater. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dahmen J, Kim J, Ouellet-Plamondon CM (2018) Life cycle assessment of emergent masonry blocks. J Clean Prod. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.