EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 409 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 409 (2023) 06017 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 409, 2023
International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management (ICMSEM 2023)
Article Number 06017
Number of page(s) 12
Section Risk Assessment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340906017
Published online 01 August 2023
  1. N. Umeokafor, A.O. Windapo, P. Manu, I. Diugwu, H. Haroglu, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management (2022) [Google Scholar]
  2. M.A. Kallow, A.A. Bodla, A. Ejaz, M.R. Ishaq, International Journal of Construction Management pp. 1–9 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. D.Q. Tran, K.R. Molenaar, Journal of Management in Engineering 30, 153 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Benta, I.M. Podean, C. Mircean, Informatica Economica 15, 142 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  5. L.S. Spedding, A. Rose, Business risk management handbook: A sustainable approach (elsevier, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  6. A.C. Hansen, P.L. Willumsen, J. Oehmen, Proceedings of the Design Society 2, 191 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. D.W. Hubbard, How to measure anything: Finding the value of intangibles in business (John Wiley & Sons, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Sarbazhosseini, C. McDonald, D. Saifullah, An evaluation of organisational statetransition approach in project portfolio management: results from five government cases, in AIPM National Conference Proceedings (2014), pp. 24–34 [Google Scholar]
  9. N.K, The Best-Run Businesses Run SAP (2004) [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Thanh Luu, S.T. Ng, S. Eng Chen, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 10, 209 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A.A. Oyetunji, S.D. Anderson, Journal of construction engineering and management 132, 3 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M.M. Kumaraswamy, S.M. Dissanayaka, Building and Environment 36, 337 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D.T. Luu, S.T. Ng, S.E. Chen, M. Jefferies, Advances in Engineering Software 37, 159 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S.T. Ng, D.T. Luu, S.E. Chen, K.C. Lam, Construction Management & Economics 20, 285 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. K.R. Molenaar, A.D. Songer, M. Barash, An Automated Prediction Tool for DesignBuild Projects, in Construction Congress V: Managing Engineered Construction in Expanding Global Markets (ASCE, 1997), pp. 582–589 [Google Scholar]
  16. O. Hanseth, K. Braa (1998) [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Blessing, M. Goerk, V. Bach, Knowledge and Process management 8, 75 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. P.P.M. Institute), A guide to the project management body of knowledge [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Jaafari, International journal of project management 19, 89 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Davies, Engineering & Technology 5, 44 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Ronza, L. Lázaro-Touza, S. Carol, J. Casal, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 22, 639 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. E. Broughton, Environmental Health 4, 1 (2005) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Ahmed, B. Kayis, S. Amornsawadwatana, Benchmarking: An International Journal 14, 22 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Qazi, J. Quigley, A. Dickson, K. Kirytopoulos, International journal of project management 34, 1183 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. A.J. Dorofee, J.A. Walker, C.J. Alberts, R.P. Higuera, R.L. Murphy, Tech. rep., Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh PA (1996) [Google Scholar]
  26. V.N. Leopoulos, K.A. Kirytopoulos, C. Malandrakis, Production Planning & Control 17, 322 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Y.E. Saud, K. Israni, J. Goddard, Process Safety Progress 33, 26 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. V. Casey, I. Richardson, European systems and software process improvement and innovation, Dublin, Ireland (2008) [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Nieto-Morote, F. Ruz-Vila, International Journal of Project Management 29, 220 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. L. Chen, W. Pan, Applied soft computing 102, 107103 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Keele et al., Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (2007) [Google Scholar]
  32. J.M. Verner, O.P. Brereton, B.A. Kitchenham, M. Turner, M. Niazi, Systematic literature reviews in global software development: a tertiary study, in 16th International Conference on Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2012) (IET, 2012), pp. 2–11 [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Davies, T. Brady, M. Hobday, MIT Sloan management review (2006) [Google Scholar]
  34. J. Dhlamini, I. Nhamu, A. Kaihepa, Intelligent risk management tools for software development, in Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Conference of the Southern African Computer Lecturers’ Association (2009), pp. 33–40 [Google Scholar]
  35. P. Linares, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 17, 895 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. N. McCrae, E. Purssell, Journal of Advanced Nursing 72, 2284 (2016) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. H.A. Qureshi, International Journal of Contemporary Research and Review 9, 20218 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. R.A. Krueger, Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (Sage publications, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  39. J. Corbin, A. Strauss, Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2015) [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Saunders, P. Lewis, A. Thornhill, Research methods for business students (Pearson education, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  41. W. Blyth, European Review of Energy Markets 3, 28 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  42. P.K. Dey, S.O. Ogunlana, Industrial Management & Data Systems (2004) [Google Scholar]
  43. T. Litman, Victoria Transport Policy Institute pp. 1–35 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  44. M. Mentis, Forest ecosystems 2, 2 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. H. Thamhain, Project management journal 44, 20 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.