EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 411 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 411 (2023) 02067 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 411, 2023
VI International Conference on Actual Problems of the Energy Complex and Environmental Protection (APEC-VI-2023)
Article Number 02067
Number of page(s) 7
Section Ecology, Environmental Protection and Conservation of Biological Diversity
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341102067
Published online 10 August 2023
  1. Semendyaeva, N. 2002 Properties of solonetzes in Western Siberia and the theoretical basics of chemical reclamation (Novosibirsk: SUE EPA SB RAAS) 157 [Google Scholar]
  2. Elizarov N, Lomova T, Ustinov M and Popov V 2019 The effect of agrobiological melioration on the salt profile of solonetzes in Eastern Baraba. J. Bull. of Novosib. st. agr. univ. 1 18–25 [Google Scholar]
  3. Semendyaeva N, Korobova L and Elizarov N 2014 Changes in the properties and biological activity of crusty solonetzes in the Baraba Lowland under the long-term impact of gypsum. J. Euras. Soil. Sci. 11 22–1116 [Google Scholar]
  4. Konstantinov M and Kucherenko A 2000 Terms and methods of grassing Baraba solonetzes. J. Kormoproiz 4 13–15 [Google Scholar]
  5. Gao W, Xu J, Zhao J, Zhang H, Ni Y, Zhao B and Jia Z 2020 Prokaryotic community assembly after 40 years of soda solonetz restoration by natural grassland and reclaimed farmland. J. Europ. J. of soil biol. 100 103213 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gottel N, Castro H, Kerley M, Yang Z, Pelletier D, Podar M, Karpinets T, Uberbacher E, Tuskan G, Vilgalys R, Doktycz M and Schadt C 2011 Distinct microbial communities within the endosphere and rhizosphere of Populus deltoides roots across contrasting soil types. J. Appl. Environm. Microbiol. 77 44–5934 [Google Scholar]
  7. Knief C, Delmotte N, Chaffron S, Stark M, Innerebner G, Wassmann R, von Mering C and Vorholt J 2012 Metaproteogenomic analysis of microbial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of rice. J. ISME 6 90–1378 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mendes L, Kuramae E, Navarrete A, van Veen J and Tsai S 2014 Taxonomical and functional microbial community selection in soybean rhizosphere. J. ISME 8 87–1577 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Girvan M, Bullimore J, Pretty J, Osborn A and Ball A 2003 Soil type is the primary determinant of the composition of the total and active bacterial communities in arable soils. J. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69 09–1800 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Berg G and Smalla K 2009 Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. J. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 68 1–13 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Coleman-Derr D, Desgarennes D, Fonseca-Garcia C, Gross S, Clingenpeel S, Woyke T, North G, Visel A, PArtida-Martinez L and Tringe S 2016 Plant compartment and biogeography affect microbiome composition in cultivated and native Agave species. J. New Phytol 209 798–811 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bulgarelli D, Garrido-Oter R, Munch P, Weiman A, Dröge J, Pan Y, McHardy A and Schulze-Lefert P 2015 Structure and function of the bacterial root microbiota in wild and domesticated barley. J. Cell Host & Microbe 17 392–403 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lomova T and Korobova L 2015 Phytomeliorative cultivation of Baraba solonetzes and its influence on the biological activity of the soil. J. Sib. Bull. of Agric. Sci. 1 12–18 [Google Scholar]
  14. Korobova L, Riksen V and Lomova T 2022 Biodiversity of shallow solonets bacterias, occupied longly with crop rotation with Bromus inermis (Poaceae). J. Agric. and Envir. 2(22) [Google Scholar]
  15. Riksen V and Korobova L 2022 Functional and taxonomic changes in the domain Bacteria in response to phytomelioration of saline soils (Dushanbe: IOP Publishing Ltd) 012046 [Google Scholar]
  16. World reference base for soil resources 2006 (Rome: World Soil Resources Reports) [Google Scholar]
  17. Edgar, R. 2016 SINTAX, a Simple Non-Bayesian Taxonomy Classifier for 16S and ITS Sequences. bioRxiv 9 074161 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fierer N, Leff J, Adams B, Nielsen U, Bates S, Lauber C, Owense S, Gilberte J, Wall D and Caporaso J 2012 Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes. J. PNAS 109(52) 21390–395 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Makhalanyane T, Valvede A, Gunnigle E, Frossard A, Ramond J and Cowan D 2015 Microbial ecology of hot desert edaphic systems. J. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39(2) 203–221 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jones R, Robenson M, Lauber C, Hamady M, Knight R and Fierer, N. 2009 A comprehensive survey of soil acidobacterial diversity using pyrosequencing and clone library analyses. J. ISME 3(4) 442–453 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin YT, Lin YF and Tsai I 2019 Structure and diversity of soil bacterial communities in offshore islands J. Sci. reports 9(1) 4689 [Google Scholar]
  22. De Bruyn J, Nixon L, Fawaz M, Johnson M and Radosevich M 2011 Global biogeography and quantitative season dynamics of gemmatimonadetes in soil J. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77 (17) 6295–6300 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Krishna M, Gupta S, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Morrien E and Garkoti S 2020 Successional trajectory of bacterial communities in soil are shaped by plant-driven changes during secondary succession. J. Sci. reports 10 1–10 [Google Scholar]
  24. Bhattacharyya A, Pablo C, Mavrodi O, Weller D, Thomashow L and Mavrodi D 2021 Rhizosphere plant-microbe interactions under water stress. J. Adv. in appl. microbiol 115 65–113 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.