EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 412 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 412 (2023) 01059 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 412, 2023
International Conference on Innovation in Modern Applied Science, Environment, Energy and Earth Studies (ICIES’11 2023)
Article Number 01059
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341201059
Published online 17 August 2023
  1. Aguiar RAP Gaspar J, Reis ZSN Santos MRJr, Correa MDJr. Implementation of the Caesarean Births Review using the ten group Robson‘s classification and its immediate effects on the rate of caesareans, at a university hospital. Poster presented at the international congress Birth: Clinical Challenges in Labor and Delivery, March 5-7 2015, Fortaleza, Brazil; p21. [Google Scholar]
  2. Amatya A Paudel R Poudyalawagle RR Singh M Thapa S Examining Stratified Cesarean Section Rates Using Robson Classification System At Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2013; [Google Scholar]
  3. Abdel-Aleem H Shaaban OM Hassanin AI Ibraheem AA Analysis Of Cesarean Delivery At Assiut University Hospital Using The Ten Group Classification System. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013; 123: 119-123 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bezzad R., Rapport sur l’implantation du système de classification des dix groupes de la césarienne pour la qualité des soins maternels au niveau des maternités au Maroc. 2021. Hôpital Maternité Santé de Reproduction les Orangers, CHU Ibn Sina – Rabat, Centre Collaborateur de l’OMS. MAROC [Google Scholar]
  5. Blondel B, Lelong N, Kermarrec M, Go¡Inet F, La Santé Périnatale En France Métropolitaine De 1995-2010, J Gynecolobstetbiolreprod (Paris) 2012 ; 31 ;151-66 [Google Scholar]
  6. Boatin AA, Cullinane F, Torloni MR, Betrán AP. Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review. 2017 https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14774 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boerma T., Ronsmans C., Melesse D.Y., Barros A.J., Barros F.C., Juan L., Moller A.B., Say L., Hosseinpoor A.R., Yi M., Neto D.D., Global Epidemiology Of Use Of And Disparities In Caesarean Sections, The Lancet, 2018 Oct 13; 392(10155):1341-1348. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kassou, M., Bourekkadi, et al. (2021). Blockchain-based medical and water waste management conception. E3S Web of Conferences, 2021, 234, 00070 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brugeilles, C. (2014). L’accouchement par césarienne, un risque pour les droits reproductifs ? Autrepart, 70, 143-164. https://doi.org/10.3917/autr.070.01434. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chrifi Hassan, Assarag Bouchra, Boudallaa Ikram, Bititi Abderrahmane Amine And Soulaymaniabdelmajid (2022). Caesarean Section Rates At The Hospital Maternity: A Moroccan Case Study Using The Robson Classification System. International Journal Of Advanced Research 10(05):497-506. May 2022. DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/14732 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dong W, Xie S. Construction of a prediction model and a prevention control system for cesarean section rate based on the Robson classification system. Am J Transl Res. 2021 Apr 15;13(4):3238-3245. PMID: 34017494; PMCID: PMC8129404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dumont, A. & Guilmoto, C. (2020). Trop Et Pas Assez A La Fois : Le Double Fardeau De La Césarienne. Population & Sociétés, 581, 1-4. https://Doi.Org/10.3917/Popsoc.581.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gautam P, Karki C, Adhikari A. Robson’s Group 2 Criteria Among Total Caesarean Sections In A Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021 Nov 15;59(243):1098-1101. Doi: 10.31729/Jnma.7138. PMID: 35199745; PMCID: PMC9124328. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Haut-Commissariat au Plan, (2015). Le Maroc en chiffres. Rabat, Maroc. [Google Scholar]
  15. Joshua P VogelMBBS, Ana Pilarbetrán, PhdNadia Vindevoghel, MDJoão Paulo SouzaPhd, Maria Regina TorloniPhd, ProfJun ZhangPhd, Et Al Lancet 1 May 2015 Use Of The Robson Classification To Assess Caesarean Section Trends In 21 Countries: A Secondary Analysis Of Two WHO Multicountry Surveys [Google Scholar]
  16. Kodio Amose 2018. Etude De La Cesarienne Selon La Classification De Robson Au C.H.U Gabriel Keag O.E., Norman J.E., Stock S.J., Long-Term Risks And Benefits Associated With Cesarean Delivery For Mother, Baby, And Subsequent Pregnancies: Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis, Plos Med, 2018; 15(1):E1002494. [Google Scholar]
  17. Macfarlane AJ, Blondel B, Mohangoo AD, Cuttini M, Nijhuis J, Novak Z Et Al. Wide Differences In Mode Of Delivery Within Europe: Risk-Stratified Analyses Of Aggregated Routine Data From The Euro-Peristat Study. BJOG. 2016;123(4):559–68. Doi: 10.1111/14710528.13284. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Manseur F., Lachmat A., Krouk Y., Oukid M. S. (2020). Indications of Caesarean section, Interest in Robson’s classification. Les indications de la césarienne, Intérêt de la classification de Robson. JFMB N°6-AVRIL 2020. E-ISSN 2716-8190 [Google Scholar]
  19. Mayne L, Liu C, Tanaka K, Amoako A. Caesarean section rates: applying the modified ten-group Robson classification in an Australian tertiary hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jan;42(1):61-66. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1873923. Epub 2021 May 2. PMID: 33938362. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mi J, Liu F. Rate Of Caesarean Section Is Alarming In China. Lancet. 2014;383(9927):1463–4. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60716-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ministère de la Santé (2021), «Comptes Nationaux De La Santé 2018», Rabat, Maroc. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ministère de la santé, (2018). Enquête nationale sur la population et la santé familiale (ENPSF). Rabat, Maroc. [Google Scholar]
  23. Murrieta Alicia Márquez (2021). Les césariennes non nécessaires et la violence obstétricale au mexique : une visibilité et des résonances croissantes. S.F.S.P. | «Santé Publique». 2021/5 Vol. 33 | Pages 685 A 694. ISSN 0995-3914. DOI 10.3917/Spub.215.0685. https://Www.Cairn.Info/Revue-Sante-Publique-2021-5Page-685.Htm [Google Scholar]
  24. OMS, WHO Statement On Caesarean Section Rates, Geneva, Switzerland; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  25. OMS, WHO Recommendations On Non-Clinical Interventions To Reduce Unnecessary Caesarean Section. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  26. Räisänen S, Gissler M, Kramer MR, Heinonen S. Influence Of Delivery Characteristics And Socioeconomic Status On Giving Birth By Caesarean Section – A Cross Sectional Study During 2000–2010 In Finland. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:120. Doi: 10.1186/14712393-14-120. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Robson MS Classification Of Caesarean Sections. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2001; 12: 2339 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sabatino G., Les Douleurs Post-Césariennes, La Revue Sage-Femme, Volume 18, Issue 3, 2019, Pages 135-144, ISSN 1637-4088, https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Sagf.2019.03.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Robson MS Classification Of Caesarean Sections. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2001; 12: 2339 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schantz C, De Loenzien M, Goyet S, Ravit M, Dancoisne A, Dumont A. How Is Women’s Demand For Caesarean Section Measured? A Systematic Literature Review. Plos One. 2019 Mar 6;14(3):E0213352. Doi: 10.1371/Journal.Pone.0213352. PMID: 30840678; PMCID: PMC6402700. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tan JK Tan EL Kanagalingan D Tan LK Rational Dissection Of A High Institutional Cesarean Section Rate: An Analysis Using The Robson Ten Group Classification System. J Obstetgynaecol Res. 2014; (Published Online Nov 5.) [Google Scholar]
  32. Tapia V, Betran AP, Gonzales GF. Caesarean Section in Peru: Analysis of Trends Using the Robson Classification System. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 3;11(2):e0148138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148138. PMID: 26840693; PMCID: PMC4740461. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Torloni MR, Betran AP, Souza JP, Widmer M, Allen T, Gulmezoglu M, Et Al. Classifications For Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review. Plos One. 2011;6(1):E14566. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ye J Betrán AP Vela MG Souza JP Zhang J Searching For The Optimal Rate Of Medically Necessary Cesarean Delivery. Birth. 2014; 41: 237-244 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zamané H, Kiemtoré S, Kain PD, Zongo A, Hounkanri BMG Sawadogo YA, Ouattara A, Ouédraogo I, Savadogo-Komboigo BE, Ouédraogo CMR. Évaluation de la pratique de la césarienne selon la classification de Robson dans un district sanitaire de Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso [Evaluation of the Practice of Caesarean Section According to Robson’s Classification in a Health District of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso]. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2018;111(5):263-268. French. doi: 10.3166/bspe-20190059. PMID: 30950589. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zwecker P, Azoulay L, Abenhaim HA. Effect Of Fear Of Litigation On Obstetric Care: A Nationwide Analysis On Obstetric Practice. Am J Perinatol. 2011;28(4):277–84. Doi: 10.1055/S-0030-1271213. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.