Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 414, 2023
2nd International Conference “SUstainable PolyEnergy generation and HaRvesting – SUPEHR23”
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 8
Section Electrochemical and Alternative Energy Storage
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341401004
Published online 25 August 2023
  1. Energy Agency, I., 2021, World Energy Outlook 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. EU, 2021, “Fit for 55” [Online]. Available: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/green-deal/fit-for-55-the-eu-plan-for-a-green-transition/. [Accessed: 21-Apr-2023]. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kondziella, H., and Bruckner, T., 2016, “Flexibility Requirements of Renewable Energy Based Electricity Systems A Review of Research Results and Methodologies,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertsch, J., Growitsch, C., Lorenczik, S., and Nagl, S., 2016, “Flexibility in Europe’s Power Sector-An Additional Requirement or an Automatic Complement?,” Energy Econ, 53. [Google Scholar]
  5. IEA, “Grid Scale Storage” [Online]. Available: IEA (2022), Grid-Scale Storage, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/grid-scale-storage, License: CC BY 4.0. [Accessed: 17-Apr-2023]. [Google Scholar]
  6. Energy Information Administration, U., 2021, Battery Storage in the United States: An Update on Market Trends. [Google Scholar]
  7. Vannoni, A., and Sorce, A., “Performance Comparison of Cold Thermal Storage for Gas Turbine Inlet Cooling with Traditional Energy Storage Technologies in Current Electricity Markets,” SIMULATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF ENERGY SYSTEMS. [Google Scholar]
  8. Vasylyev, A., Vannoni, A., and Sorce, A., “Best Practices for Electricity Generators and Energy Storage Pptimal Dispatch Problems.” [Google Scholar]
  9. Stroe, D. I., Swierczynski, M., Stroe, A. I., Laerke, R., Kjaer, P. C., and Teodorescu, R., 2016, “Degradation Behavior of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Lifetime Models and Field Measured Frequency Regulation Mission Profile,” IEEE Trans Ind Appl, 52(6). [Google Scholar]
  10. Xu, B., Oudalov, A., Ulbig, A., Andersson, G., and Kirschen, D. S., 2018, “Modeling of Lithium-Ion Battery Degradation for Cell Life Assessment,” IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 9(2). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fallahifar, R., and Kalantar, M., 2023, “Optimal Planning of Lithium Ion Battery Energy Storage for Microgrid Applications: Considering Capacity Degradation,” J Energy Storage, 57. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sayfutdinov, T., Ali, M., and Khamisov, O., 2020, “Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers for the Optimal Siting, Sizing, and Technology Selection of Li-Ion Battery Storage,” Electric Power Systems Research, 185. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee, J. O., and Kim, Y. S., 2022, “Novel Battery Degradation Cost Formulation for Optimal Scheduling of Battery Energy Storage Systems,” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 137. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sayfutdinov, T., Patsios, C., Vorobev, P., Gryazina, E., Greenwood, D. M., Bialek, J. W., and Taylor, P. C., 2020, “Degradation and Operation-Aware Framework for the Optimal Siting, Sizing, and Technology Selection of Battery Storage,” IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 11(4). [Google Scholar]
  15. Stroe, D. I., 2014, “Lifetime Models for Lithium-Ion Batteries Used in Virtual Power Plant Applications.” [Google Scholar]
  16. Rancilio, G., Lucas, A., Kotsakis, E., Fulli, G., Merlo, M., Delfanti, M., and Masera, M., 2019, “Modeling a Large-Scale Battery Energy Storage System for Power Grid Application Analysis,” Energies (Basel), 12(17). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.