Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 422, 2023
2023 5th International Conference on Resources and Environment Sciences (ICRES 2023)
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 10
Section Environmental Protection, Life Cycle Assessment, and Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342202003
Published online 06 September 2023
  1. Priarone PC, Campatelli G, Catalano AR, Baffa F (2021) Life-cycle energy and carbon saving potential of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing for the repair of mold inserts. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 35:943–958. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Shi Y, Faludi J (2020) Using life cycle assessment to determine if high utilization is the dominant force for sustainable polymer additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing 35:101307. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Godina R, Ribeiro I, Matos F, et al (2020) Impact Assessment of Additive Manufacturing on Sustainable Business Models in Industry 4.0 Context. Sustainability 12:7066. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gao C, Wolff S, Wang S (2021) Eco-friendly additive manufacturing of metals: Energy efficiency and life cycle analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 60:459–472. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bekker ACM, Verlinden JC (2018) Life cycle assessment of wire + arc additive manufacturing compared to green sand casting and CNC milling in stainless steel. Journal of Cleaner Production 177:438–447. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Prakash C, Singh S, Kopperi H, et al (2021) Comparative job production based life cycle assessment of conventional and additive manufacturing assisted investment casting of aluminium: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production 289:125164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kokare S, Oliveira JP, Santos TG, Godina R (2023) Environmental and economic assessment of a steel wall fabricated by wire-based directed energy deposition. Additive Manufacturing 61:103316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kokare S, Godina R, Oliveira JP (2022) Digital Platform for Environmental and Economic Analysis of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing. In: Camarinha-Matos LM (ed) Technological Innovation for Digitalization and Virtualization. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 233–243 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Landi D, Zefinetti FC, Spreafico C, Regazzoni D (2022) Comparative life cycle assessment of two different manufacturing technologies: laser additive manufacturing and traditional technique. Procedia CIRP 105:700–705. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pop A, Titu AM (2016) Study Regarding the Quality Assurance in Manufacturing Processes. Management of Sustainable Development 8. [Google Scholar]
  11. Li L, Li C, Tang Y, Yi Q (2017) Influence factors and operational strategies for energy efficiency improvement of CNC machining. Journal of Cleaner Production 161:220–238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Singh SR, Khanna P (2021) Wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM): A new process to shape engineering materials. Materials Today: Proceedings 44:118–128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fernandes J, Peixoto M, Mateus R, Gervásio H (2019) Life cycle analysis of environmental impacts of earthen materials in the Portuguese context: Rammed earth and compressed earth blocks. Journal of Cleaner Production 241:118286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. ISO 14044:2006 (2006) Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines. ISO International Organization for Standardization [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.