EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 422 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 422 (2023) 03004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 422, 2023
2023 5th International Conference on Resources and Environment Sciences (ICRES 2023)
Article Number 03004
Number of page(s) 8
Section Environmental Impact Assessment of Infrastructure Construction and Building Fire Protection
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342203004
Published online 06 September 2023
  1. Mitchell D, DeVall R.H, Saatcioglu M, Simpson R, Tinawi R, Tremblay R. Damage to concrete structures due to the 1994 Northridge earthquake, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering; 22, page 361-377, (1995). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mitchell D, DeVall R.H, Kobayashi K, Tinawi R, Tso W.K. Damage to concrete structures due to the January 17, 1995, Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 23, page 757-770, (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Tsai K.C, Hwang S.J. Seismic Retrofit Program for Taiwan School Buildings After FTER 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake, 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (2008). [Google Scholar]
  4. Lukkunaprasit P, Ruangrassamee A, Boonyatee T, Chintanapakdee C, Jankaew K, Thanasisathit N, Chandrangsu T. Performance of Structures in the Mw 6 1 Mae Lao Earthquake in Thailand on May 5 2014 and Implications for Future Construction. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 23, page 219-242, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  5. Celik O.C. Holistic Seismic Behavior and Design of Buildings. FACADE Conference, page 161-173, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  6. Masi A, Chiauzzi L, Santarsiero G, Manfredi V, Biondi S, Spacone E, Gaudio C.D, Ricci P, Manfredi G, Verderame G.M. Seismic response of RC buildings during the Mw 6.0 August 24 2016 Central Italy earthquake the Amatrice case study. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering; 17, page 5631-5654, (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Foutch D.A, Hjelmstad K.D, Calderon E.D.V, Gutierrez E.F, Downs R.E. The Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985: Case studies of seismic strengthening for two buildings in Mexico City. Earthquake Spectra; 5, page 153–174. (1989) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Canbay E, Ersoy U, Ozcebe G. Contribution of reinforced concrete infills to seismic behavior of structural systems. ACI Structural Journal, 100, page 637–643, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  9. Badoux M., Jirsa J.O. Steel bracing of RC frames for seismic retrofitting. Journal of Structural Engineering, 116, page 55–74, (1990). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fukuyama H, S. Sugano. Japanese seismic rehabilitation of concrete buildings after the Hyogoken–Nanbu earthquake. Cement and Concrete Composites, 22, page 59–79, (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ozcelik R, Binici B, Kurç O. Pseudo dynamic testing of an RC frame retrofitted with chevron braces. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 16, page 515–539, (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Seible F. Priestley M.J.N, Hegemier G.A, Innamorato D. Seismic retrofit of RC columns with continuous carbon fiber jackets. Journal of Composites for Construction (ASCE); 1(2), page 52–62, (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Triantafillou TC. Shear strengthening of reinforced concrete beams using epoxybonded FRP composites. ACI Structural Journal, 95(2), page 107–115, (1998). [Google Scholar]
  14. Saingam P, Matsuzaki R, Nishikawa K, Sitler B, and Terazawa Y, Takeuchi T. Experimental Dynamic Characterization of Friction Brace Dampers and Application to the Seismic Retrofit of RC Buildings. Engineering Structures, 242, Paper ID 112545, (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Xu Y.L, Ng C.L. Seismic Protection of a Building Complex Using Variable Friction Damper: Experimental Investigation. Engineering Mechanics; 134(8), page 637-649, (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Qu Z, Ji X, Xiao Shi X, Wang Y, Liu H. Cyclic loading test of steel coupling beams with mid-span friction dampers and RC slabs. Engineering Structures; 203, Paper ID 109876, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  17. Thipprapan T, Jarasjarungkiat A, Saingam P, Petchsasithon A. Seismic Retrofit of RC Building with Elastic Stage of Buckling-Restrain Braces. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, page. 187-196, (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fujishita K, Sutcu F, Matsui R, Takeuchi T. Damage distribution based energydissipation retrofit method for multi-story RC building in Turkey. IABSE Symposium Report, 104, page 1–8, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  19. Takeuchi T, Wada A. Buckling-restrained braces and application. The Japan Society of Seismic Isolation. [Google Scholar]
  20. Saingam P, Sutcu F, Terazawa Y, Fujishita K, Lin P.C, Celik O.C and Takeuchi T. Composite Behavior in RC Buildings Retrofitted using Buckling-Restrained Braces with Elastic Steel Frames. Engineering Structures, 219, Paper ID 110896, (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Saingam P. Response Control on Seismic Retrofit of Low-Rise RC Frame Using Viscous Damper. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, 276), page 38-48, (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilson E.L, CSI Analysis Reference Manual For SAP 2000, ETABS, SAFE, and CSI Bridge. Berkeley: Computers & Structures, Inc (2015). [Google Scholar]
  23. Quaketek, Seismic Design with Friction Dampers. <https://www.quaketek.com/seismic-design/>. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER). PEER NGA Ground Motion Database, <https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/site>. [Google Scholar]
  25. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-16), (2016). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.