Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 422, 2023
2023 5th International Conference on Resources and Environment Sciences (ICRES 2023)
Article Number 03006
Number of page(s) 11
Section Environmental Impact Assessment of Infrastructure Construction and Building Fire Protection
Published online 06 September 2023
  1. Enrico R, Silvia A Saverio M.: A fire safety assessment approach for evacuation analysis in underground physics research facilities [J]. Fire safety J, 108 (Sep.), 102839.1—8 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  2. Enrico D, Luca F, Luca M.: FLAME: A Parametric Fire Risk Assessment Method Supporting Performance Based Approaches [J]. Fire technol, 57(2), 721-65 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  3. Khan A, Khan A, Anwar A.: Framework for fire risk assessment of bridges [J]. Structures, 2021, 33. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wu Y, Kang J, Mu JY.: Assessment and simulation of evacuation in large railway stations [J]. Architectural simulation, 14(5), 1553—66 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  5. Brzezińska D, Bryant P.: Risk Index Method—A Tool for Building Fire Safety Assessments [J]. Applied Sciences, 11(8), 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wu F, Cheng L, Yu LY.: Research on the index system of chemical enterprise safety risk state based on analytic hierarchy [J]. E3S Web of Conferences, 245 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  7. Carbon F, Graphene.: Applied Composites.: Researchers from University of Manchester Report Recent Findings in Applied Composites (Fire Safety Assessment of Epoxy Composites Reinforced) [J]. Technology News Focus, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yang HT, Yu B, Song PG.: Surface-coating engineering for flame retardant flexible polyurethane foams: A critical review [J]. Compos part B-eng, 176(C), 107185.1—14 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhao L, Liu WG, Wu Y.: Bid evaluation decision for major project based on analytic hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency model [J]. J amb intel hum comp, 11(9), 3639—47 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Han YM, Zhou RD, Geng ZQ.: A novel data envelopment analysis cross-model integrating interpretative structural model and analytic hierarchy process for energy efficiency evaluation and optimization modeling: Application to ethylene industries [J]. J clean prod, 246(C), 118965.1—13 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  11. Ron A.: Open and shut safety case [J]. Ron Alalouff, 52—55 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhou N, Xu B, Li X.: An assessment model of fire resources demand for storage of hazardous chemicals [J]. Process saf prog, 39(3), 12135.1—10 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  13. Yan ZG, Wang Y.: Developing a Subway Fire Risk Assessment Model Based on Analysis Theory [J]. Math probl eng, 16, 5549952.1—13 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  14. Dae K, Yong HJ.: Comparative study on the construction of support system initiating event fault trees for a fire probabilistic safety assessment [J]. Nucl eng des, 332 (Jun.), 345—356 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.