EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 426 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 426 (2023) 01004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 426, 2023
The 5th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2023)
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 10
Section Integrated Sustainable Science and Technology Innovation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342601004
Published online 15 September 2023
  1. A. H. Damawan, S. Azizah, Resistance to change: causes and strategies as an organizational challenge, Advance in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 395, pp. 49-52 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Buschmeyer, G. Schuh, D. Wentzel, Organizational transformation towards Product- Service Systems - empirical evidence in managing the behavioural transformation process, Elsevier B. V, Procedia CIRP 47, pp. 264-269 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Fiedler, Managing resistance in an organizational transformation: A case study from a mobile operator company, International Journal of Project Management 28, pp. 370-383 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. I. Heim and N. Sardar-Drenda, Assessment of employees’ attitudes toward ongoing organizational transformations, Journal of Organizational Change Management (2020) [Google Scholar]
  5. I. Ajzen, The Theory of Planned Behaviour, University of Massachusetts at Amherest, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Process 50, pp. 179-211 (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. I. Ajzen, Constructing a Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire, University of Massachusetts at Amherest, Technical Report (2006) [Google Scholar]
  7. I. Ajzen, Perceived behavioural control, self- efficacy, locus of control, and theory of planned behaviour, Journal of Apllied Social Psychology 32, pp. 665- 683 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. I. Ajzen, Attitudes, personality, and behaviour (2nd Edition), England: Open University Press/McGraw- Hill (2005) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen, Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research, MA: Addison-Wesley (1975) [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Kock, P. Hadaya, Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods, Information Systems Journal 28, 1, 227–261 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Suzianti, F. R. Haqqi, S. N. Fathia, Strategic recommendations for financial technology service development: a comprehensive risk-benefit IPA-Kano analysis, Journal of Modelling in Management, pp. 1746-5664 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  12. R.L. Schalock, M.A. Verdugo, J. Loon, Understanding organization transformation in evaluation and program planning, Evaluation and Program Planning 67, pp. 53-60 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Hua, W. Fanga, X. Yu, Enhancing individual commitment to energy conservation in organizational settings: Identity manipulation for behavioural changes, Resources, Conservation & Recycling 156, 104720 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. R. N. Lopesa, R. A. Kalidb, J. L. M. Rodrígueza, A new model for assessing industrial worker behaviour regarding energy saving considering the theory of planned behaviour, norm activation model and human reliability, Resources, Conservation & Recycling 145, pp. 268–278 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J.P. Kotter, Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail, Boston: Harvard Business School Press (1996) [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Keller, M. Meaney, C. Pung, The science behind successful organizational transformations: Losing from day one, Why even successful transformations fall short, McKinsey & Company, Global Survey Report, January (2021) [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Gamal, Mengapa banyak transformasi perusahaan gagal, Kompasiana Press, December, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  18. Shift Indonesia, 3 Penyebab transformasi gagal, Shift Indonesia Press, June (2020) [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Lines, The structure and function of attitudes toward organizational change, Human Resource Development Review 4, 1, pp. 8–22 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Chawla, and E.K. Kelloway, Predicting openness and commitment to change, The Leadership & Organization Development Journal 25, 6, pp.485-498 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Regar, J. Mullane, L. Gustafson, S. DeMarie, Creating earthquakes to change organizational mindsets, Academy of Management Executive 8, 4, pp. 31-46 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Dwight, Eisenhower: Address at the Second Assembly of the World Council of Churches, Evanston, Illinois., August 19, 1954. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project, http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=9991 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  23. Standarku.com, Standar metode importance urgency mapping (2020) [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Savitha, Eisenhower Matrix: Time Management–Importance vs. Urgency, labinmotion.com/author/savitha/ (n.d.) [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Rita, Eisenhower Matrix: How to prioritize tasks (examples, template), https://blog.logrocket.com/product-management/eisenhower-matrix-prioritize-tasks-examples-template/ (n.d.) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.